Skip to comments.
BREAKING: CHERYL MILLS TO DESTROY EMAILS ABOUT BOSS HILLARY CLINTON
observer.com ^
| 8/7/15
| Sidney Powell
Posted on 08/07/2015 7:06:53 PM PDT by Buttons12
In a letter sent to the U.S. State Department and just filed today with U.S. federal Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, the counsel for Cheryl Mills wrote: Ms. Mills does not believe that she has paper copies of potential records in her possession. Following our production on August 10, 2015 [of the defense counsels version of the electronic records], we have instructed her to delete any and all electronic records in her possession.
(Excerpt) Read more at observer.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Arkansas; US: District of Columbia; US: Massachusetts; US: New York
KEYWORDS: bananarepublic; blgpimp; cherlymills; cherylmills; clinton; clintoncontempt; clintoncrimefamily; clintonscandals; coverup; cultureofcorruption; destroyedevidence; emmetgsullivan; federaljudge; hillaryemails; hillaryemailserver; mills; millscontempt; nomoreconstitution; nomorejudiciary; obamalegacy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-118 next last
Another article about it at: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/judicial-watch-hillary-clinton-top-225117494.html
1
posted on
08/07/2015 7:06:53 PM PDT
by
Buttons12
To: Buttons12
Doesn’t this violate both judicial and government standards for records retention?
2
posted on
08/07/2015 7:08:56 PM PDT
by
BlueNgold
(May I suggest a very nice 1788 Article V with your supper...)
To: Buttons12
Impetuous high treason which tests Article III
against Enemies of the USA, foreign and domestic.
3
posted on
08/07/2015 7:10:23 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
To: Buttons12
“Your honor, I have instructed my client to destroy all of the evidence.”
4
posted on
08/07/2015 7:11:50 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Henry Bowman where are you?)
To: Buttons12
"F U Judge Sullivan."
5
posted on
08/07/2015 7:12:13 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
To: Diogenesis
6
posted on
08/07/2015 7:13:21 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Buttons12
How is this not blatantly criminal?? I know these a-holes think they’re untouchable but this has to cross the line!
7
posted on
08/07/2015 7:14:33 PM PDT
by
rainee
(Her)
To: Buttons12
Covering for Hillary! at every turn.......drip......drip......drip.
8
posted on
08/07/2015 7:15:24 PM PDT
by
originalbuckeye
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
To: ClearCase_guy
Possible disbarment for the attorneys so advising and the full weight of the law nonetheless onto Ms Mills, IMHO, and IANAL.
HF
9
posted on
08/07/2015 7:15:25 PM PDT
by
holden
To: Buttons12
It is now clear that Clinton, Abedin and Mills plan to thumb their noses at the Judge and the State Department.
No one is cooperating, despite their empty rhetoric to the contrary.
To: BenLurkin
That woman is definitely on happy pills.
To: Buttons12
12
posted on
08/07/2015 7:20:23 PM PDT
by
july4thfreedomfoundation
(Liberals are like the Taliban and ISIS....destroying cultural icons they don't like.)
To: MarvinStinson
Prosecute and jail, then they will start squealing. But they have to DO it.
To: Buttons12
Mills has been a cleaning lady for a long time - she was the one who went into Vince Foster’s office the night of his “suicide” and “tidied up” some of his paperwork....
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
15
posted on
08/07/2015 7:23:05 PM PDT
by
Nachum
(Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
To: BenLurkin
"Doesn't the stupid Judge know what we did to Mr. Foster?"
16
posted on
08/07/2015 7:24:40 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
To: BlueNgold
The State Department itself has not been forthcoming with Judge Sullivan, with Congress, or with anyone else.
It allowed Mrs. Clinton to use an off-the-grid system for her entire tenure in the Department, and it kept that startling fact a secret as long as possible.
It is simply shocking that the State Department did not immediately inform Congress, the Court, and Judicial Watch that Mrs. Clinton operated solely on a private email server and that the State Department did not have her records. It took months even to discover those crucial facts.
To: Intolerant in NJ
Thanks, good memory.
Multiple crimes, who will convict her?
18
posted on
08/07/2015 7:25:44 PM PDT
by
PROCON
(FReeping on CRUZ Control)
To: Buttons12
Why is Mrs. Clinton refusing to confirm, under penalty of perjury, to disclose facts about her email system and to confirm she isn't withholding federal records?" Because scheming whore hillary refuses. As usual, it looks as if she will skate on another felony.
19
posted on
08/07/2015 7:25:45 PM PDT
by
Mr Apple
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCrO2SPsYjI)
To: ClearCase_guy
It is especially telling that there was no Inspector General at the State Department while Mrs. Clinton led the department
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-118 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson