Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Court Strikes Down 'Discriminatory' Texas Voter ID
ABC News/AP ^ | 08/05/2015 | Paul Weber

Posted on 08/05/2015 11:31:31 AM PDT by GIdget2004

A federal appeals court has struck down Texas' voter ID law, ruling that the Republican-backed measure first passed in 2011 violates the Voting Rights Act.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans said Wednesday that the Texas law, one of the toughest voter ID measures in the country, violates Section 2 of the landmark civil rights law. The U.S. Justice Department had joined minority groups in a drawn-out legal battle that has stretched for years.

A lower court had previously found that the voter ID was passed by the Republican-controlled Texas Legislature with the intent of discriminating against minorities. But in striking down the law, the appeals court did not find the voter ID requirement to be the equivalent of a poll tax.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; aliens; election2016; electionfraud; tedcruz; texas; votefraud; voterfraud; voterid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
This is the decision of the US 5th District, generally considered among the most conservative districts.
1 posted on 08/05/2015 11:31:31 AM PDT by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

And yet they have identified as traitors and communists.


2 posted on 08/05/2015 11:32:20 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

The 2009 SCOTUS ruling takes precedent, that states’ Voter ID is CONSTITUTIONAL!!!!


3 posted on 08/05/2015 11:35:22 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

We have photo ID here in backward Alabama. No problems. We have always had to show some kind of ID. Photo started with the last election.


4 posted on 08/05/2015 11:36:02 AM PDT by Himyar (Sessions: the only real man in D.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Voter ID was struck down by a state judge here in PA.

Apparently SCOTUS is only “Supreme” when it agrees with Liberals.


5 posted on 08/05/2015 11:38:13 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Democrat voter registration groups are probably working the cemeteries as we read this.


6 posted on 08/05/2015 11:40:09 AM PDT by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Ignore the ruling and do it anyway


7 posted on 08/05/2015 11:41:01 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All


Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


8 posted on 08/05/2015 11:41:07 AM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

It’s okay, their argument on this matter will be applied to background checks on firearms. They’ll get the voter ID knocked out but in return, we will eliminate the background check and 4473 paperwork.

The die is cast on this.


9 posted on 08/05/2015 11:41:28 AM PDT by BCR #226 (02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
This is the decision of the US 5th District, generally considered among the most conservative districts.

No such thing

10 posted on 08/05/2015 11:41:30 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: GIdget2004
This is the law that they deem as violating Civil Rights Laws. How absurd:

In 2011, the Texas Legislature passed Senate Bill 14 (SB 14) creating a new requirement for voters to show photo identification when voting in person. While pending review within the judicial system, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Shelby County v. Holder, which effectively ended all pending litigation. As a result, voters are now required to present an approved form of photo identification in order to vote in all Texas Elections.

This requirement is effective immediately.

Here is a list of the acceptable forms of photo ID:
•Texas driver license issued by the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS)
•Texas Election Identification Certificate issued by DPS
•Texas personal identification card issued by DPS
•Texas concealed handgun license issued by DPS
•United States military identification card containing the person’s photograph
•United States citizenship certificate containing the person’s photograph
•United States passport

With the exception of the U.S. citizenship certificate, the identification must be current or have expired no more than 60 days before being presented for voter qualification at the polling place.

No wonder we are going to hell on a speeding bullet to hell.

12 posted on 08/05/2015 11:43:23 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

Turning Texas blue is a key step in the Leftist plan to “fundamentally transform” America.

Apparently this court is on board with the plan.


13 posted on 08/05/2015 11:45:38 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul

Just lesser evil. Thats what half of FR demanded.


14 posted on 08/05/2015 11:46:07 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing
The 2009 SCOTUS ruling takes precedent, that states’ Voter ID is CONSTITUTIONAL!!!!

This ruling did not say that Voter ID is unconstitutional. It said that the particular Voter ID law enacted by Texas violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. It wasn't a challenge to the constitutionality of the law.

15 posted on 08/05/2015 11:50:13 AM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I read the article, and could not determine if this was a 2-1 decision by a rogue panel of appellate judges, or a decision by the entire court en banc. If the former, the entire court may yet strike down this decision. If the latter, I am concerned about that circuit.


16 posted on 08/05/2015 11:53:07 AM PDT by Defiant (I will vote for the candidate that the GOPe and media hate the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing
That was the "Crawford v. Marion County Election Board", 553 U.S. 181 (2008), United States Supreme Court case holding that an Indiana law requiring voters to provide photo IDs did not violate the Constitution of the United States.

Why this is probably deemed Constitutional, whereas the Texas law not Constitutional, is that under Indiana law, voters who do not have a photo ID may cast a provisional ballot. To have their votes counted, they must visit a designated government office within 10 days and bring a photo ID or sign a statement saying they cannot afford one.

Which means they can go to that government office and lie that they cannot afford one, sign a paper and their vote still counts. Even though they may not be the person for whom they cast a vote as. So Democrats, and their liberal minions, are alright with that as they win!!!

17 posted on 08/05/2015 11:54:34 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004; All
Since the Supreme’s supported voter ID requirements in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, we need to have a look at the Texas voter ID law.
18 posted on 08/05/2015 11:55:28 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

9th circus wannabes


19 posted on 08/05/2015 11:56:29 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

I would think so since they are in New Orleans!!!


20 posted on 08/05/2015 11:56:46 AM PDT by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson