Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A CEO raised his company's minimum wage to $70,000 a year, and some employees quit because of it
Business Insider ^ | July 31, 2015 | by RACHEL SUGAR

Posted on 07/31/2015 3:44:29 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

When Dan Price, CEO of the Seattle-based credit card payment processing firm Gravity Payments, announced he was raising the company's minimum salary to $70,000 a year, he was met with overwhelming enthusiasm.

But in the weeks since then, it's become clear that not everyone is equally pleased. Among the critics? Some of Price's own employees.

Two of the company's "most valued" members have left the company, "spurred in part by their view that it was unfair to double the pay of some new hires while the longest-serving staff members got small or no raises."

Maisey McMaster — once a big supporter of the plan — is one of the employees that quit.

"He gave raises to people who have the least skills and are the least equipped to do the job, and the ones who were taking on the most didn’t get much of a bump," she told the Times.

Grant Moran, 29, had similar concerns. While his own salary saw a bump he worried the new policy didn't reward work ethic. "Now the people who were just clocking in and out were making the same as me." "It shackles high performers to less motivated team members."

For his part, Price — who's also under fire from other local business owners and his brother, who says Price owes him money — stands by his plan, but doesn't begrudge his critics.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: capitalism; danprice; economics; gravitypayments; minimumwage; seattle; socialism; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer

I just told Mrs Gamecock about this post. Her reply? “Didn’t you say this was going to happen when the story first broke?”


21 posted on 07/31/2015 4:10:12 PM PDT by Gamecock (Many Atheists: "There is no God and I hate Him!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vpintheak

If I own a company and want to put a floor on wages, using my money, I’m a communist?


22 posted on 07/31/2015 4:10:40 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (TED CRUZ. You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
and the ones who were taking on the most didn’t get much of a bump

These fellows just aren't being good socialists.

The company should be glad to get rid of them.

23 posted on 07/31/2015 4:12:09 PM PDT by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

an idiot who will put himself out of business and thereby solve the problem, anyway


24 posted on 07/31/2015 4:13:56 PM PDT by faithhopecharity (up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I don’t understand: Are we saying the government should force him not to do this? It’s his company, he can make his own decisions and succeed or fail on it. I am totally against the government interfering.


25 posted on 07/31/2015 4:16:27 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

He probably did this to avoid paying taxes on profits. He shifted profits to expenses in the form of payroll.

Now, if the company shows no profit and high payroll expense, who will want to invest or loan him money? What money will he use to build up the company?


26 posted on 07/31/2015 4:16:51 PM PDT by AlmaKing (It's Beer Thirty Somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AlmaKing

He certainly could have repaid his brother, who apparently did lend him money to build his business, before giving major raises to employees.


27 posted on 07/31/2015 4:19:11 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Exactly!


28 posted on 07/31/2015 4:20:13 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: vpintheak

I don’t think what this company is doing is communism. The government didn’t force them. Employees who don’t like it should leave, and they have left. The CENTER made a decision and it will fail or succeed.


29 posted on 07/31/2015 4:20:21 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

Generally, capitalism is associated with a meritocracy. CEO Price, who seems to be admirable, has created a socialist utopia where exceptionalism has no reward. His company will fail.


30 posted on 07/31/2015 4:20:44 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
No, you're not. But you may be shooting yourself in the foot if you wind up paying the same rate to slackers as you do your best employees, like this guy did. You might also find people at online discussion forums pointing out how your egalitarianism illustrates why communism doesn't work.
31 posted on 07/31/2015 4:21:05 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

<<< It’s his company, he can make his own decisions and succeed or fail on it. >>>

Of course.


32 posted on 07/31/2015 4:22:48 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

Communism is done with government force. Thus is a business decision that may fail or succeed.


33 posted on 07/31/2015 4:23:55 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AlmaKing

It may actually get a lot worse for them.

Gravity Payments, according to two web sources I seen have anywhere from 100 to 250 employees and have revenue of up to 10 million per year. I understand that this info may not be exact or up to date.

However, at 10 million per year and ONLY 100 employees, (giving them the benefit of doubt)that equals $100,000 of revenue per employee and they are paying them $70,000.

That’s insane !!!!

They will be out of business before too long.


34 posted on 07/31/2015 4:28:02 PM PDT by Zeneta (Thoughts in time and out of season.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Socialism ruins the morale of the hard workers.

35 posted on 07/31/2015 4:28:51 PM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

It’s his money. You can start a company and do it a different way.


36 posted on 07/31/2015 4:29:30 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (TED CRUZ. You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Yet rational people can draw parallels between two different things that share certain similar aspects while exhibiting varying details, don’t you agree?


37 posted on 07/31/2015 4:29:42 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I missed the post where someone suggested otherwise. Can you point it out to me?


38 posted on 07/31/2015 4:30:47 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Brother sues Dan Price, Gravity Payments CEO, after $70,000 minimum wage policy

Lucas Price accused his brother of paying himself excessively and depriving Lucas of his shareholder rights, according to the Times. Lucas Price reportedly wants Gravity Payments to repurchase his shares and provide financial documents and records.

The lawsuit pits two brothers, the cofounders of Gravity Payments, against one another.

When Dan Price announced the new minimum wage at Gravity Payments, he also pledged to cut his own pay to $70,000 a year from about $1 million to help spread the wealth among his employees. The CEO also said the new wage plan would likely eat into up to 80% of the company’s forecasted $2.2 million profit this year.

Sounds like plan to screw his brother out of his minority shares, rendering them worthless, forcing him to sell, then going back to business as usual. JMO.

39 posted on 07/31/2015 4:32:31 PM PDT by MD Expat in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

If you want to pick a fight based on this story, choose someone else. I’m busy.


40 posted on 07/31/2015 4:33:47 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (TED CRUZ. You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson