Posted on 07/27/2015 10:36:43 AM PDT by Red Badger
Using powerful computer simulations, researchers from Brown University have identified a material with a higher melting point than any known substance.
The computations, described in the journal Physical Review B (Rapid Communications), showed that a material made with just the right amounts of hafnium, nitrogen, and carbon would have a melting point of more than 4,400 kelvins (7,460 degrees Fahrenheit). That's about two-thirds the temperature at the surface of the sun, and 200 kelvins higher than the highest melting point ever recorded experimentally.
The experimental record-holder is a substance made from the elements hafnium, tantalum, and carbon (Hf-Ta-C). But these new calculations suggest that an optimal composition of hafnium, nitrogen, and carbon—HfN0.38C0.51—is a promising candidate to set a new mark. The next step, which the researchers are undertaking now, is to synthesize material and corroborate the findings in the lab.
"The advantage of starting with the computational approach is we can try lots of different combinations very cheaply and find ones that might be worth experimenting with in the lab," said Axel van de Walle, associate professor of engineering and co-author of the study with postdoctoral researcher Qijun Hong. "Otherwise we'd just be shooting in the dark. Now we know we have something that's worth a try."
The researchers used a computational technique that infers melting points by simulating physical processes at the atomic level, following the law of quantum mechanics. The technique looks at the dynamics of melting as they occur at the nanoscale, in blocks of 100 or so atoms. The technique is more efficient than traditional methods, but still computationally demanding due to the large number of potential compounds to test. The work was done using the National Science Foundation's XSEDE computer network and Brown's "Oscar" high-performance computer cluster.
Van de Walle and Hong started by analyzing the Hf-Ta-C material for which the melting point had already been experimentally determined. The simulation was able to elucidate some of the factors that contribute to the material's remarkable heat tolerance.
The work showed that Hf-Ta-C combined a high heat of fusion (the energy released or absorbed when it transitions from solid to liquid) with a small difference between the entropies (disorder) of the solid and liquid phases. "What makes something melt is the entropy gained in the process of phase transformation," van de Walle explained. "So if the entropy of the solid is already very high, that tends to stabilize the solid and increase the melting point."
The researchers then used those findings to look for compounds that might maximize those properties. They found that a compound with hafnium, nitrogen, and carbon would have a similarly high heat of fusion but a smaller difference between the entropies of the solid and the liquid. When they calculated the melting point using their computational approach, it came out 200 kelvins higher than the experimental record.
Van de Walle and Hong are now collaborating with Alexandra Navrotsky's lab at the University of California-Davis to synthesize the compound and perform the melting point experiments. Navrotksy's lab is equipped for such high-temperature experiments.
The work could ultimately point toward new high-performance materials for a variety of uses, from plating for gas turbines to heat shields on high-speed aircraft. But whether the HfN0.38C0.51 compound itself will be a useful material isn't clear, van de Walle says.
"Melting point isn't the only property that's important [in material applications]," he said. "You would need to consider things like mechanical properties and oxidation resistance and all sorts of other properties. So taking those things into account you may want to mix other things with this that might lower the melting point. But since you're already starting so high, you have more leeway to adjust other properties. So I think this gives people an idea of what can be done."
The work also demonstrates the power of this relatively new computational technique, van de Walle says. In recent years, interest in using computation to explore the material properties of a large number of candidate compounds has increased, but much of that work has focused on properties that are far easier to compute than the melting point.
"Melting point is a really difficult prediction problem compared to what has been done before," van de Walle said. "For the modeling community, I think that's what is special about this."
Explore further: Landmark discovery in gold nanorod instability
More information: Physical Review B, journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.020104
Journal reference: Physical Review B
Compounds made from hafnium and carbon have some of the highest known melting points. Using computer simulations, Brown University engineers predict that a material made with hafnium, nitrogen, and carbon will have a higher melting point than any known material. Credit: van de Walle lab / Brown University
But Al Gore has already stated the melting point of the earth’s interior is “millions of degrees.”
The holy Goreacle has spoken. Dare not question the proclamations of the Goreacle, heretic.
According to Algore..." People think about geothermal energy - when they think about it at all - in terms of the hot water bubbling up in some places, but two kilometers or so down in most places there are these incredibly hot rocks, 'cause the interior of the earth is extremely hot, several million degrees, and the crust of the earth is hot ...",
I will be glad when this country gets back into actual space flight and such so innovations could be used for advancement. Muslim outreach won’t be there to hold progress back.
What did they use for a thermometer? His finger?.............................
Welding for one. I go through lots of tungsten electrodes for welding aluminum in my shop. I would think if it is affordable and tough enough new machining methods can be adapted for my traditional CNC milling and lathe work. I think a lot of large scale uses will be dependent on toughness. If it can compete with nickle and titanium (and alloys) for things such as turbine engine blades it will be quite useful. And I’m sure nuclear energy engineers will be salivating over possibilities for reactors.
Seems impractical here on earth because anything capable of creating that heat would melt also.
Components for Nuclear Fusion. Crystal Fusion chambers (Lab made Diamonds) and depending upon where it sits on the Mohs scale, any other application that requires intense heat, crucibles, refractories et al. Certainly space applications like heat shields for reentry etc ...
I don’t think they’ll be making sheet skins or I-beams out of it. Probably thin film gaskets and tiny parts used in Nuclear Weapons detonation.
good ideas, all.
With hafnium at about $1500 per pound I don’t think so.
And that’s just the Haf of it!........................
Your reply suggests an interesting experiement. Yeah, sure this material can handle 7460°F. But, NASA should put the question to a test under its new modern charter. How about trying heat tiles made of muslims? The theory being they are perhaps evolved such to withstand the temperatures of hell.
You never know until you try! It would all be a just a part of muslim outreach!!
True.
Apparently it is very hard to refine.
All of the price quotes state that the price is hafnium that is 99.8% (metals basis excluding Zr), Zr nominal 4.5%
And since Zirconium is not part of the optimal composition of hafnium, nitrogen, and carbon alloy, making a commercial quantity of this substance maybe next to impossible.
Capitalism will find a way.........................
The zirconium could be a luck accident. It may contribute positive qualities like corrosion resistance or hardness.
But if there is a profit to be made someone will find a way to eliminate the offending impurity or take advantage of it.
Hypersonics. Nuke containment vessels. Car engines. Jet Engines.
Particle beam containment.
There are many.
“Researchers predict material with record-setting melting point [4,400 kelvins / 7,460°F]”
That’s nothing. I have a computer program that models a theoretical material that has predicted melting point of 8,460°F!
“Researchers predict material with record-setting melting point [4,400 kelvins / 7,460°F]”
That’s nothing. I have a computer program that models a theoretical material that has predicted melting point of 8,460°F!
Oh, and I forgot to add that MY material uses only haf as much hafnium as THEIR material!
Oh, so theirs is only haf-assed.......................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
