Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I personally don't see why they bother. After all, next year Anthony Kennedy and SCOTUS will do their work for them and pronounce that "LGBT Rights" are contained in the Constitution and that, what we thought were religious freedom rights, were never there in the first place.

Sadly, I cannot attach a </sarc> tag to the above paragraph.

1 posted on 07/25/2015 6:04:29 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: markomalley

Homosexuals! The commie lib DemocRATS’ number one issue.


2 posted on 07/25/2015 6:07:57 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Remember! It's not a hate crime if the victim is white.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

3 posted on 07/25/2015 6:14:41 AM PDT by Bon mots (Relax, I'm joking. :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
"No American citizen should ever have to live their lives in fear of discrimination," Cicilline said.

Unless you're a Christian, of course.

4 posted on 07/25/2015 6:20:10 AM PDT by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

The Homos will soon regret all these special rights that are being given to them. They are going to be shoved back into the closet and violently so.


6 posted on 07/25/2015 6:25:46 AM PDT by Ajnin (Wolves don't lose sleep over the opinion of sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
Frankly, I don't care who marries who, I have no problem with that. I have friends on both sides of the issue, some of my best friends are gay, some others who disagree are friends as well. Here in our Republic, we realize that some people will do things that others may not like and there are times we must live with that but on the other hand to force others to go against their beliefs is wrong too and again, that is another founding principle of our Republic. Unfortunately, there are people behind an agenda who keeps pushing and pushing to keep beating those that disagree. As my father said, if you keep beating on a given group of people, eventually they will fight back and when that happens, people on both sides will get hurt or worse. I don't want to see that. Yeah, now we have same sex marriage now but it isa multi-way street, there had to be respect for those who oppose it too.

I think where a lot of this started was the Civil Rights movement and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Barry Goldwater was right to oppose it, I would have as well, because of the unintended consequences. Because of that, every person or group who does not get their way will cry "civil rights" until they get their way.
7 posted on 07/25/2015 6:25:46 AM PDT by Nowhere Man ("I wish we were back in the world of Andy Williams." - My mother, 1938-2013, RIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

This bill is designed to push another narrative for the 2016 election. Dems will say Republicans support discrimination, then some stupid RINOs will cave and say “No, no...we believe in tolerance and equality, please be nice to us MSM!” and then they’ll lose the election as always.


8 posted on 07/25/2015 6:26:00 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
That "community" (doesn't that sound nice?) won't be happy until the one thing that makes them feel badly about their BEHAVIOR is out of the way:
God.

10 posted on 07/25/2015 6:28:48 AM PDT by kinsman redeemer (The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

“No American citizen should ever have to live their lives in fear of discrimination,” Cicilline said.

Yeah I find ‘mo’s offensive and want the sick broken sobees to not be anywhere near me or my kids They can GFTS.

Where exactly in your stupid bill are my rights protected?


14 posted on 07/25/2015 6:40:48 AM PDT by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Does it have a Muslim exemption clause?


15 posted on 07/25/2015 6:40:49 AM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
IF we OBEYED GOD, we would NOT HAVE THIS PROBLEM !
17 posted on 07/25/2015 6:43:12 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Ah, David Cicciwennie! I had the honour of kicking him out of my back yard when he came around my neighborhood campaigning for Mayor of Providence. He and his entourage came uninvited through the gate and into my yard where I was gardening. I walked up to him and said I’m voting for Cianci and escorted him back down my driveway. He’s a Dem so naturally in RI he won and the first thing he did was raise the rainbow flag over City Hall. They can pass all the laws they want but it doesn’t change the fact that they are an abomination.


24 posted on 07/25/2015 8:25:37 AM PDT by heylady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

...on Monday get fired for who you are.

BS. The whole “marriage” issue was non-existent 20 years ago. It was just manufactured to fake respectability and refurbish the gay image, after a decade of AIDS. Even then the gays blamed Reagan, the government, and the medical establishment for failing to pay enough attention to them. Gays back then wanted to be promiscuous; they certainly didn’t want to “get married” and “have children” and “be a family.” Children were for pedophiles, and that subject was best kept quiet. Gayness was an adult XXX lifestyle. AIDS is what put their lifestyle in the public eye.

Before the 80s, gays were around, in school and at work. Everyone knew certain people were probably homosexuals. NOBODY discriminated against gays, because NOBODY discussed ANYBODY’s sex life publicly. I NEVER saw anyone get fired for being a perceived homosexual. In fact, a “bachelor” or “single woman” was often more likely to be promoted to supervisor in particularly demanding, time- consuming occupations. To suggest gays were ever discriminated against in housing is ridiculous. A straight, unmarried couple was more likely to raise eyebrows, especially if a baby arrived before a wedding. Two guys or two girls were just roommates, sharing expenses. Nobody even thought to ask questions, because it just wasn’t polite.
Privacy laws protected everyone, including homosexuals. Nobody’s bedroom door was being kicked down. The sodomy and public indecency laws were only enforced when someone—gay or straight— was caught in flagrante in a public park or restroom.
But the gays complained about being “in the closet” because they insist it’s their “right” to do what they do publicly, in your face, and in front of children.
Now we’re being forced, in every school, workplace, housing, to have endless conversations about everyone’s sexual preferences and predelictions, and whether or not their “genitalia” is intact or altered. While OUR most private thoughts and beliefs are subjected to relentless intrusion, scrutiny, and judgement by a tiny minority of dejenerate jerks who have granted themselves absolute power over every aspect of public life and unlimited access to our children. They have granted themselves the right to harass, punish, destroy, not only those who refuse to endorse their behavior, but even those of us who just don’t want to talk about it.


25 posted on 07/25/2015 8:30:52 AM PDT by mumblypeg (I've seen the future; brother it is murder. -L. Cohen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson