Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump: 'I identify with some things as a Democrat'
The Hill ^ | 07/24/2015 | Jesse Byrnes

Posted on 07/24/2015 6:18:42 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Donald Trump, a 2016 Republican presidential candidate, said Friday he sometimes identifies more as a Democrat when pressed to explain previous statements that the economy generally does better under Democrats than Republicans.

"I identify with some things as a Democrat," Trump said on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" when pressed about the comments from 2004, adding that "generally speaking" he was "never a Bush fan."

ADVERTISEMENT
"When the economy crashed so horribly under George Bush because of mistakes they made having to do with banking and lots of other things, I don't think the Democrats would have done that," Trump said.

"Now, I see it both ways, but I hated what I was watching in the last two years of George Bush, because it was a bubble that was waiting to explode," he added. "What they were doing was a death wish, and I saw that."

"I have seen things done by Republicans that are not good and are not smart, and I would not do that," he said.

The celebrity real estate developer skyrocketed to the top of many polls following the launch of his GOP White House bid in mid-June, amid weeks of criticism and media attention to his controversial comments on Mexican immigrants.

Trump made waves this week after he threatened during an interview with The Hill to run as a third-party candidate. He played down that possibility Thursday, saying, "I want to run as a Republican. I think I'll get the nomination."

"Over the years as a businessman, I've always helped everybody," Trump said Friday on MSNBC, further explaining his past support for both Democrats and Republicans.

"I'm a conservative, I want to run as a Republican, I'm leading every poll," he said. "I do not want to do independent at all. Now, if I'm treated poorly, that's one thing. If I'm treated well and with great respect and don't win, I would not do that."

Trump had suggested to The Hill on Wednesday that the Republican National Committee "has not been very supportive." He said Friday that the RNC has been "very, very nice over the last few days.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2016elections; 2016issues; donaldtrump; rnc; trump; trump2016
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-286 next last
To: C. Edmund Wright

From the start, Bush embraced a governing philosophy of deregulation. That trickled down to federal oversight agencies, which in turn eased off on banks and mortgage brokers. Bush did push early on for tighter controls over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but he failed to move Congress. After the Enron scandal, Bush backed and signed the aggressively regulatory Sarbanes-Oxley Act. But SEC head William Donaldson tried to boost regulation of mutual and hedge funds, he was blocked by Bush’s advisers at the White House as well as other powerful Republicans and quit.


101 posted on 07/24/2015 7:05:59 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

“I expect Trump’s support, although broad, is also probably shallow. Trump is all over the place on policy issues. The more he talks the more inconsistent he demonstrates himself to be. That’s going to hurt him in the long run. Right now, my fear is that the GOPe will make a martyr out of him, and drive him to a 3rd party run.”

That is the best analysis I have read of the Trump phenomena yet. Well Said!


102 posted on 07/24/2015 7:06:21 AM PDT by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca, deport all illegal aliens, abolish the IRS, DEA and ATF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein
"I heard the same phone call. It did seem for a while that the caller was a democratic plant. But after he made a few points, Rush did shrug and say that Trump would have to explain all these different positions. I don’t think Rush is supporting Trump - I think he admires his gutsiness and lack of shame over his own words."

The other day Rush said we have our "entertainment" right now, and after it's over, there are a couple of solid conservatives in the race. That made me think he sees things as they really are.

But his attitude yesterday turned me off. I guess part of is that Trump's his golfing buddy.

103 posted on 07/24/2015 7:06:28 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (("This is a Laztatorship. You don't like it, get a day's rations and get out of this office."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

The 80s were really good for me! For that I continue to thank Reagan.


104 posted on 07/24/2015 7:06:29 AM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: "I should like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

> “I’m alarmed by the realization that some conservatives are as prone as liberals to cult-like worship of a politician, no matter how many times they hear the truth about the person. If it happens once, it can happen again with another public figure.”

When you write “prone ... to cult-like worship” I take it to mean cheerleading and quips like “Go Trump!”, “Go the Donald!”, etc.

Is there ever a time when voters don’t do these things?

I mean “Go X!” and “Vote for X!”, etc. It seems your argument can be transferred to any public figure that voters enthusiatically support, ergo all voters usually gravitate to “cult-like worship”. Your alternative it seems (and which I support) would be that voters be serious, somber, aware and keep a watchful suspicious eye on any public figure that aspires to be a political leader; no cheerleading allowed. I’m all for that. But then I’m for rain on Mondays, sunbreaks on Tuesdays and sunny days on Saturdays and Sundays in my ordered Universe. The problem is reality gets in my way by trying to teach me that I don’t have control. So as an adaptive human being, I keep an umbrella handy. Should we accept that voters are going to be emotional no matter who the candidate is? What’s the alternative?


105 posted on 07/24/2015 7:06:29 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

On the surface I don’t like it. But neither do I think Bush handled it like a true conservative. Trump’s statement that the Democrats would not have done what Bush did is just plain wrong unless he means (and it does not sound like it) they would have done something even worse.

Bush was a big government big spender. He talked conservative talk but he walked a liberal walk, at least economically. I think he also joined the massive political deceivers wing on the social issues. He said one thing. He often did another.


106 posted on 07/24/2015 7:07:36 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

But does Trump have even a snowball’s chance at being the 45th?

Let’s allow Trump his 15 minutes. Then focus on the adults in the race.


107 posted on 07/24/2015 7:07:57 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (With Great Freedom comes Great Responsibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: AmericanCheeseFood

If I vote for democrat, that’s my business. But, I won’t. However, I won’t vote for a rino, either. Becaue, as you said, “by default” I’d be voting for a democrat.


108 posted on 07/24/2015 7:08:48 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican (I'll never vote for another rino and it sickens me that I voted for McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"I don't think the Democrats would have done that," Trump said.

Donald Trump: Living proof that in America even dumb people can get rich or run for office.

109 posted on 07/24/2015 7:09:06 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (The judicial supremacist lie has killed 60 million innocents. Stop it before it kills America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Bush had enforcement powers over the banking and securities industry and failed to use those powers.

Of course GW Bush didn’t start the problem. Who said he did?

But Bush let it ride, that’s the problem.


110 posted on 07/24/2015 7:09:28 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
"Remember the W worship? There are even a few of them still here on FR."

I've only been here since 2011, though I started lurking in 2008. I missed most of that. I did know about the Daily Dose of W, though. ;)

111 posted on 07/24/2015 7:09:31 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (("This is a Laztatorship. You don't like it, get a day's rations and get out of this office."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg

At least Trump is honest.

Unlike many RINO’s who promote themselves as conservatives, but are
“Fake Conservatives”.


112 posted on 07/24/2015 7:10:47 AM PDT by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

This. Exactly.


113 posted on 07/24/2015 7:11:00 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
"When you write “prone ... to cult-like worship” I take it to mean cheerleading and quips like “Go Trump!”, “Go the Donald!”, etc."

Not at all. That's common for just about any candidate.

I'm referring to things I've seen such as Trump is Reagan/Churchill/the savior of the country/a superhero (and yes, I've really seen that).

114 posted on 07/24/2015 7:11:47 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon (("This is a Laztatorship. You don't like it, get a day's rations and get out of this office."))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Colonel_Flagg

Nah, I think most people here can separate two aspects regarding Trump. His policies and views are, to me, out of step. That is why I will not vote for him. His refusal to bow to the media and take insults from the elite laying down is refreshing. It is effective and, hopefully, contagious. That is what, I think, endears him to many on FR. I know I am tired of the outrage/shame police shutting down the debate and relegating us to the (for now) virtual gulags.


115 posted on 07/24/2015 7:11:56 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lwd
This Trump circus sideshow is the same as Bachmann (what we allowed them to do to her was ridiculous to watch) or Herman Cain ...or howard dean. Happens every election.

Yup, mostly agree.

I would just say it's probably not fair to lump Bachmann in with this group of fakes and frauds. She actually had won elections on the local and congressional district level. She had already proven she could win general election campaigns, had a pretty clear track record, etc. I don't consider Bachmann a manipulative snake oil peddler the way Trump and Cain were.

116 posted on 07/24/2015 7:12:06 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I never said I’d vote third party. But I might. This crap of “vote for a rino or you might as well vote for a democrat” is BS. Voting for a rino IS voting for a democrat! What is it going to take to open peoples’ eyes. W introduced Obama. McCain gave us Obama. Romney helped us keep Obama.

If a decent third party had been started in 2008 it would be a force to be reckoned with today. But nooooo. Doing that would have helped elect a democrat. /s So a third party wasn’t formed and what happened? Obama happened! Twice!

And what is said about a third party today? “A third party will only help elect a democrat. Let’s keep doing what we’re doing.”

Now I’ll sit back and wait for the personal insults.


117 posted on 07/24/2015 7:13:59 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican (I'll never vote for another rino and it sickens me that I voted for McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker

Great post. Walker doesn’t have charisma either. Like it or not - obana had charisma and the voters went for it. Romney was a stick-in-the-mud, and boring. I think he would have been a better president that obama, but, lacked charisma and personality. We have to remember that people vote for charm and personality - not so much platforms or ideas. We are in the age of the LIV, and reality stars - sadly. I also got to thinking about what Trump said about identifying with some of the DEM positions, economy, etc. He is going after the DEM vote - pure and simple. Sure, he might believe some of their points, but, I also think he would surround himself with excellent advisers.


118 posted on 07/24/2015 7:16:33 AM PDT by Catsrus (WWWW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

“Gee wiz Donald, you econ genius, all of that crash happened precisely because of what “Democrats would have done’ and what they DID...”

I agree. GWB made some dumb decisions too, but the structure for the bubble and crash was rooted in laws passed by Democrats.

That is why I’m not a Trumpster. I’d vote for him against a Democrat in the general election. But I think it has been obvious at least since Bill Clinton that Democrats, as a rule, loathe what made America great and have no clue whatsoever about how the real world operates. They have no clue how their “fairness” policies CREATE bigger problems than the ones the are supposed to solve (but don’t).

“... the ability to become personally wealthy, while a damned good ability,hasn’t got anything to do necessarily with understanding the macro economy.”

More true words. Stuff going on under Obama with housing is setting up huge problems for us 10-20 years from now. If someone cannot understand that, they won’t understand how to head them off. If Trump couldn’t figure out in 2000 what problems were being created, then he won’t be much help now.


119 posted on 07/24/2015 7:17:13 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Can you remember what America was like in 2004?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

Bachmann’s supporters (I was one of them) ditched her after the first debate for no good reason. If I recall correctly, she made some 100% accurate 10th amendment pro-states rights comments and the rest of the RINO candidates (with the help of the media) acted like what she had said was completely incorrect (when it wasn’t as far as I know) and that she was living on Mars or something. Everyone fell for the ruse and ditched her. It was a sad day for the Republican Party.


120 posted on 07/24/2015 7:17:27 AM PDT by lwd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-286 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson