Posted on 07/23/2015 10:04:02 AM PDT by thackney
The North American ocean carrier TOTE is deploying the world’s first container ships fueled by liquefied natural gas (LNG). The move anticipates imminent environmental regulations that are likely to trigger large shifts in the maritime shipping industry.
TOTE is making the move to comply with the international Marpol Annex VI maritime emissions standards, first implemented in 2005. Restrictions on emissions like sulfur and nitrogen oxide will tighten in 2016 within designated emission control areas (ECAs), including the waters surrounding North America.
Sulfur and nitrogen oxides are generated in large volumes by conventional maritime ships, which have long relied on so-called heavy fuel oil—the thick, dirty, but affordable remnants of the crude oil refining process. According to the International Council on Clean Transportation, the ocean shipping industry currently accounts for 8% of global emissions of sulfur dioxide, which causes acid rain.
These emissions also have serious effects on human health. Michael Samulski, Director of the EPA’s Large Marine and Aviation Center, says that the tighter regulations will prevent between 12,000 and 31,000 U.S. deaths per year now linked to maritime pollution. Those impacts are not only in port areas or along coastlines, but reach hundreds of miles inland.
TOTE’s first LNG-fueled ship, the Isla Bella, was constructed by General Dynamics NASSCO, and completed in April. It will start working its planned route between Puerto Rico and Jacksonville, Florida, later this year. A second ship of the same model, dubbed the Marlin class, is expected to be completed in early 2016, and will work the same route. TOTE is also converting two ships in the Alaska trade to LNG.
TOTE claims that the Marlin class ships will emit 98 percent less nitrogen oxide, 97 percent less sulfur, and 72 percent less carbon dioxide than comparable conventional ships.
As shippers move to comply with the Marpol Annex VI standards, they have a handful of options. They can use higher-grade fuel, or install scrubbing technologies comparable to a car’s catalytic converter. TOTE CEO Anthony Chiarello says his company explored scrubbing technology, but concluded it’s not yet advanced enough. Higher grade diesel, on the other hand, “becomes a very expensive option.”
That left LNG, but it has its own challenges. Most importantly, ports don’t currently have much infrastructure for getting LNG fuel into ships. TOTE is partnering with Peuget Sound Energy to build LNG fueling facilities in Tacoma, where it will fuel its Alaskan ships, and AGL Resources is constructing a liquefaction plant in Jacksonville for Puerto Rico-bound ships. But those facilities won’t be completed until 2019 and late 2016, respectively. In the meantime, TOTE will rely on trucks and barges to fuel ships.
Despite these challenges, more LNG-fueled ships are in the pipeline. Crowley, one of TOTE’s competing carriers in Puerto Rico, is building LNG ships expected for delivery in late 2017. The United Arab Shipping Company has ordered 17 ships ready to be easily retrofitted for LNG.
“I personally believe within the next ten years, LNG will be the predominant maritime fuel,” says Chiarello. The Korean energy ministry agrees, projecting that the market for LNG ship manufacturing will grow by nearly 25 times over the next decade, and LNG fueling facilities are being built at major Korean ports to help the shipbuilding units of Samsung, Hyundai, and Daewoo capture that market.
Bye Bye Bunker Charlie...
Just wondering what the difference is in energy vs oil. We discovered if we ran our standby generator on propane, we’d loose about 500 watts (5500kw total) so we stayed with gasoline. Not sure, but if the ship’s engine is designed to run on LNG ...
These ships engines are designed to run on Nat Gas. It is not taking a fuel oil engine and converting it.
It is a more expensive engine, typically.
You just need to increase he volume of fuel getting to the engine to make up for the loss of energy. I converted ours to natural gas and as long as you get to the recommended RPMs you should get the same wattage.
L
That sounds like programming. The engine should increase fuel and air intake automatically when rpm dips from increased power usage.
I was talking propane. Sorry I didn’t make that clear. There’s a decided power drop in power output when using propane as the generator instruction book points out.
“Peuget Sound Energy “
Don’t they make cars, too?
The instruction book clearly states that a power drop of 500watts will occur if using propane. Sorry I didn’t make that clear.
Okay - so I guess LNG has more power than propane (which I forgot to mention).
5500kw is a large drop. That’s enough power to run most ships.
No, a 500watt drop from a 5500watt generator.
They should coat ships with this stuff.................
http://www.livescience.com/49515-water-repellent-material.html
Ok. I misunderstood.
500w drop is still not terrible unless you only have one aux. generator
12,000 to 31000 deaths a year linked to maritime pollution???
I call bs on this
I know it isn’t but it does create inefficiency in total power. Our total power usage at the house is around 50 amps if everything is running (except the on-demand water heater and pump) - the generator just supplies the fridge, some lights, TV, computers and the water pump (we live up a logging road in the mountains).
Sorry. Didn’t mean to give you bad information.
Propane is liquefied under reasonable pressure, 50~250 psi depending on temperature.
LNG requires great cooling to liquefy, -260°F.
Both are burned in the gas state; they have to be vaporized for use.
So comparisons can be a little misleading, unless you are only concerned with storage space.
One gallon diesel = 139,000 Btu
One gallon gasoline = 125,000 Btu
One gallon LPG (propane) = 91,000 Btu
One gallon LNG = 82,650 Btu
However LNG weighs less.
1 gallon LNG = 3.5 lbs
1 gallon LPG = 4.2 lbs
so you get more energy per pound with LNG
LNG = 21,700 BTU/lb
LPG = 23,600 BTU/lb
A better question, what companies are producing LNG and how can I invest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.