In other words, ANYONE THAT WE DON'T WANT TO HAVE A GUN.
Gramps lost his in a tragic boating accident.
This is aimed at retirees almost exclusively. Veteran retirees I think are the prime target.
The Kenyan commie b*tch is at it again.
Where believing in the Constitution, or worse The Bible, is a diagnostic for mental incompetence.
"Question: Do you like President 0bama? Yes=you're okay, No=No guns for you"
Typical liberal idiocy. Penalize the people who don't commit the crimes, excuse the ones who do.
Only the law abiding will be defenseless.
What is “subnormal intelligence?” If it’s anything below an IQ of 100, a lot of Democrats will be prevents from owning guns...maybe all of them!
"""""""""unable to manage their own affairs due to "marked subnormal intelligence, or mental illness, incompetency, condition, or disease.""""""".
"the due to" statement perfectly describes all the generations of Welfare Queens and Kings..........
Good grief, any one old enough to be demented of course should not/would not have a gun close by, but the families would see to that anyway...........Demented wouldn't know where to look for their guns anyway, lol.
Sure are a lot of loss to boating accidents these days.
THIS is why the government started Medicare, the prescription drug plan and social security: in order to gather information about people and use it to further control their lives.
Then most of bammy’s supporters would not qualify. I’m sure the gang bangers will comply though.
0bama learned well from the Soviets.
5.56mm
They are asking the wrong question - “Who should have a gun?”. The right question is “Who has the right to self defense?”.
I find that in a “debate” with liberals, it is often best to start by pointing out their obvious cognitive dissonance. So in any 2nd amendment discussion, I start with the question “Who has the natural right to defend themselves if they are attacked?” Followed by “When can the government take away a person’s natural rights?”
Not that it changes the mind of the liberal - they are true believers. But I often see others around me think through that point and come to the opinion that the 2nd amendment is there to protect the right of self defense. Not the final position I want them to see but it is a reasoned starting point. It takes them to a place of logic and thought, not emotion.
This is about "who gets the guns" when the senior passes.
Are we talking confiscation or tracking the gun's ownership.
It must be all scripted and on time, all he has to do is pull out the next agenda item.........there is no way one person could think of all this misery by themselves.
Yes, I can answer my own question, which he doesn't think for himself, and it is all scripted for him. we still have a full year to go with this monster and his CZARS.
About those CZARS, all R candidates should come out and declare that the CZARS name will never be used again, and it should be illegal in America to call them that. Should be a law..
Has that name ever been used by another President?
Till someone whispers into Obama’s ear about “Bell curves”.
Looks like I’d better run on down to the local gun store and buy that Mossberg I’ve been looking at...
...as soon as I remember where I put my car keys.
Obama just sees another way to take guns away from citizens. It has nothing to do with seniors.
Yeh...good idea. I heard seniors were organizing “gangs” in the old folks home...and going to take over the kitchen so they could get a decent meal.