The Story That Tells Everyone Who the Cop-Sack Really Is… You’ll Be Shocked! [ Waco ]

Wicked Bitch Blog ^ | Undated, Recent | Amy Irene White

[JJ_Folderol]

...When they headed to Twin Peaks that day, there was never a peaceful meeting planned. The Bandidos had no idea anything was going down, which is why they had a rather sad showing of attendance in comparison to the people brought in by the Cossacks. Several of the men in that club claim that they had other plans that day and were called in to Twin Peaks that very morning. They arrived in a forceful showing of numbers and soon flooded the patio and parking lot with Cossacks. Many witnesses say that the Cossacks posted themselves like sentries all around the parking lot...

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

We are comparing apples with apples.

The Bandidos are an organized crime syndicate. You are comparing Jews to the Bandidos.

[MrEdd]

So now you are personally asserting that all arrested were Bandidos. That way they can all be members of the one motorcycle club there which actually is a gang.

Thank you for confirming to all that my assertion about your thinking process was dead on.

And no, I didn’t hack his account.

Ethan posted that all by himself.

[mad_as_he$$]

lol...

[Ethan Clive Osgoode]

First they came for the bikers

First they came for the Bandidos, then the came for the Hells Angels, then they came for the Aryan Brotherhood, then they came for the Bloods, then they came for MS-13, then they came for the Crips, then they came for the serial killers, then they came for the rapists, then they came for the rest of the dope-dealers, and then everyone lived happily ever after.

[Robert Teesdale]

But in all that mess, I'm pretty sure 140-150 of those arrested are truly innocent. The government isn't trusted already - this doesn't help.

Respectfully, the issue isn't just that the vast majority of those arrested are innocent of crimes. The is also the issue that there were wholesale violations of the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th and 8th Amendments. Precipitated by suspicious bloodshed and exacerbated by official acts that reinforce an appalling display of careless malfeasance.

[mad_as_he$$]

Just cause they came for your boggieman doesn’t mean you are not someone else’s boggieman.

[tacticalogic]

They’re from the government, and they’re here to help.

[Robert Teesdale]

But regardless it has nothing to do with Justice.

It is more properly a legal system, not a justice system. Justice an be and occasionally is a byproduct, but the gears themselves are about law and not justice.

[CodeToad]

“These pro-criminal gang threads are embarrassing to FR.”

The cops or the bikers? Because it is the cops that acted illegally before and after.

[Robert Teesdale]

First they came for the Bandidos, then the came for the Hells Angels, then they came for the Aryan Brotherhood, then they came for the Bloods, then they came for MS-13, then they came for the Crips, then they came for the serial killers, then they came for the rapists, then they came for the rest of the dope-dealers, and then everyone lived happily ever after.

You live in an odd world, if purges and kinetic cleansing are somehow integral to your conceptual arrays of social structure and evolution.

[Impy]

Hahahahahaha. Brilliant!

[Cboldt]

I agree with all that, and have remarked about the other issues. The deaths are a big deal, obviously, and as you point out, the lack of justification for arresting innocents is a big deal too.

I think the only point I was making in 91 was that I've been more focused on the unlawful arrests, than on the details of who started the fight, who started the shooting, and who (besides the cops) was involved in use of force that day.

[Cboldt]

-- the gears themselves are about law and not justice. --

Police and prosecutors measure their performance on the basis of convictions. Guilt and innocence are secondary.

[Robert Teesdale]

I agree with all that, and have remarked about the other issues. The deaths are a big deal, obviously, and as you point out, the lack of justification for arresting innocents is a big deal too.

Yes, I agree. I did not mean to imply you were ignoring those aspects. Your legal input has been invaluable.

I think the only point I was making in 91 was that I've been more focused on the unlawful arrests, than on the details of who started the fight, who started the shooting, and who (besides the cops) was involved in use of force that day.

I highly appreciate your contributions here.