Posted on 07/15/2015 1:15:31 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
President Obama challenged critics of his newly minted Iran nuclear deal, asserting that his agreement was the only one that would prevent the country from getting a nuclear bomb.
“The facts are the facts,” he insisted, saying his argument was “hard to dispute” by critics who’s arguments he asserted “defies logic” and “makes no sense.”
He also mocked some critics, suggesting that they were unfairly raising concerns about Iran “taking over the world.”
“I say that not tongue in cheek, because if you look at some of the statements by some of our critics, you would think that Iran is, in fact, going to take over the world as a consequence of this deal, which I think would be news to the Iranians,” he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
“Before I take your questions, I’d like to say just a word about the framework with North Korea that Ambassador Gallucci signed this morning. This is a good deal for the United States,” Clinton said. “North Korea will freeze and then dismantle its nuclear program. South Korea and our other allies will be better protected. The entire world will be safer as we slow the spread of nuclear weapons."
wow an either/or statement where both sides end up with the same result.
He is the master of the false choice.
War is coming. This deal just makes it certain.
Looks like these countries didn’t want war either - Britain, France, Russia and China plus Germany.
With Obama at our helm, Fiji could beat the U.S., so this talk about war is very worrisome — especially with the traitor at the helm.
Is this satire? These days it’s hard to tell.
This was the same argument that the European leaders, in the 30’s said about the deal they signed with Adolph Hitler to give Germany the “SUDETENLAND”, and took it away from Czechoslavakia. Hitler threatened war, if he didn’t get it. Then Hitler “PROMISED” that he will never again want any more lands, outside of Germany. Hitler tore that agreement the minute Neville Chamberlain left the room. Just what do you think Iran will do, as soon as this “TREATY” is signed? I will tell you this, any agreement we sign with Iran, will not be worth the paper it was written on.
“You were given the choice between war and dishonour. You chose dishonour and you will have war.”
—Winston Churchill to Neville “Peace in Our Time” Chamberlain
You have chosen dishonor instead of war and now you shall have both. You have chosen to align with a nuclear aspiring country over a nuclear super power. The opponent you have chosen is much more dangerous than any other on the planet.
BTTT
War sounds like a pretty good option right now before they have nukes. 10 years down the road not so much. OFagO.
It is the usual straw man argument he always uses...the one with an impossible outcome verses his idea.
This guy needs to be hung as the traitor he is.
Wendy Sherman is bailing now. She doesn't want to be around when this horrendous deal fails.
[shrug]
Ok.
Dig out the MOAPs and let’s get busy. Shouldn’t take long to remove the sites...minimum collateral damage actually...
No doubt Obama says they are the JV.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/10/meet_wendy_sherman_architect_of_appeasement_disasters_in_nuclear_negotiations_with_north_korea_and_iran.html#ixzz3fzoVFcUN
““The facts are the facts,” he insisted, saying his argument was “hard to dispute” by critics who’s arguments he asserted “defies logic” and “makes no sense.””
Minute Obama said “facts” the world knew he was full of crap. I’m wondering who is a bigger liar, Obama or Hillary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.