Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Black People Should Stop Expecting White America To 'Wake Up' To Racism
Daily Beast ^ | 07.11.15 | John McWhorter

Posted on 07/12/2015 8:59:07 AM PDT by Second Amendment First

Here’s how African-Americans can and will play the same game everyone else is, even if the rules are stacked against them. Demanding new rules or a new game is unrealistic and demeaning.

After the race-related events of the past few weeks and months, it’s clear that the people who speak for black America Have a Dream, in the wake of the one Dr. King so resonantly expressed.

The idea is that the Civil Rights revolution of the 1960s wasn’t enough, that a shoe still has yet to drop. Today’s Dream is that white America will somehow wake up and understand that racism makes black America’s problems insurmountable. Not in-your-face racism, of course, but structural racism—sometimes termed White Privilege or white supremacy. Racism of a kind that America must get down on its knees and “understand” before we can move forward.

The problem is that this Dream qualifies more as a fantasy. If we are really interested in helping poor black people in America, it’s time to hit Reset.

The Dream I refer to has been expressed with a certain frequency over the past few weeks, after a succession of events that neatly illustrated the chance element in social history. First, a white woman, Rachel Dolezal, bemused the nation with her assertion that she “identifies” as black. Everyone had a grand time objecting that one can’t be black without having grown up suffering the pain of racist discrimination, upon which Dylann Roof’s murder of nine black people in a Charleston, South Carolina, church put a gruesome point on the issue. Dolezal was instantly and justifiably forgotten, after which the shootings motivated the banning of the Confederate flag from the American public sphere.

However, practically before the flags were halfway down their poles, the good-thinking take on things was that this, while welcome, was mere symbolism, and that what we really need to be thinking about is how to get America to finally wake up to—here comes the Dream—structural racism. A typical expression of the Dream is this one, from Maya Dukmasova at Slate: “There is little hope for a meaningful solution to the problem of concentrated poverty until the liberal establishment decides to focus on untangling a different set of pathologies—those inherent in concentrated power, concentrated whiteness, and concentrated wealth.”

A black identity founded on how other people think about us is a broken one indeed, and we will have more of a sense of victory in having won the game we’re in rather than insisting that for us and only us, the rules have to be rewritten.

Statements like this meet with nods and applause. But since the ’60s, the space between the statements and real life has become ever vaster. What are we really talking about when we speak of a “liberal establishment” making a “decision” to “untangle” notoriously impregnable things such as power, whiteness and wealth?

This is a Dream indeed, and the only reason it even begins to sound plausible is because of the model of the Civil Rights victories of fifty years ago, which teaches us that when it comes to black people, dreaming of an almost unimaginable political and psychological revolution qualifies as progressivism. After all, it worked then, right? So why be so pessimistic as to deny that it could happen again?

But there are times when pessimism is pragmatic. There will be no second Civil Rights revolution. Its victories grew not only from the heroic efforts of our ancestors, but also from a chance confluence of circumstances. Think about it: Why didn’t the Civil Rights victories happen in the 19th century, or the 18th, even—or in the 1920s or 1940s? It’s often said that black people were “fed up” by the ’60s, but we can be quite sure that black people in the centuries before were plenty fed up too.

What tipped things in the 1960s were chance factors, in the same way as recent ones led to a breakthrough on the Confederate flag. Segregation was bad P.R. during the Cold War. Television made abuses against black people more vividly apparent than ever before. Between the 1920s and the late 1960s, immigration to the U.S. had been severely curtailed, so black concerns, while so often ignored, still did not compete with those of other large groups as they do today.

There is no such combination of socio-historical factors today. No, the fact that Hillary Clinton is referring to structural racism in her speeches does not qualify this as a portentous “moment” for black concerns. Her heart is surely in the right place, but talking about structural racism has never gotten us anywhere significant. Hurricane Katrina was 10 years ago; there was a great deal of talk then about how that event could herald some serious movement on structural racism. Well, here we are. There was similar talk after the 1992 riots in Los Angeles after the Rodney King verdict and, well, here we are.

The old-time Civil Rights leaders did things; too often these days we think talking about things is doing something. But what, really, are we talking about in terms of doing?

Who among us genuinely supposes that our Congress, amidst its clear and implacable polarization, is really going to arrive at any “decisions” aimed at overturning America’s basic power structure in favor of poor black people?

The notion of low-skill factory jobs returning to sites a bus ride away from all of America’s poor black neighborhoods is science fiction.

In a country where aspiring teachers can consider it racist to be expected to articulately write about a text they read on a certification exam, what are the chances that all, or even most, black kids will have access to education as sterling as suburban white kids get?

Many say that we need to move black people away from poor neighborhoods to middle-class ones. However, the results of this kind of relocation are spotty, and how long will it be before the new word on the street is that such policies are racist in diluting black “communities”? This is one of Dukmasova’s points, and I myself have always been dismayed at the idea that when poor black people live together, we must expect social mayhem.

And, in a country where our schools can barely teach students to read unless they come from book-lined homes, what is the point of pretending that America will somehow learn a plangent lesson about how black people suffer from a legacy of slavery and Jim Crow and therefore merit special treatment that no other groups in America do? Calls for reparations for slavery, or housing discrimination, resonate indeed—and have for years now. However, they result in nothing, and here we are.

Note: I’m not saying it wouldn’t be great if these things happened. However, I argue that they cannot happen. It was one thing to convince America that legalized segregation and disfranchisement were wrong. However, convincing America that black people now need the dismantling of “white privilege” is too enlightened a lesson to expect a vast, heterogeneous and modestly educated populace to ever accept.

How do I know? Because I think 50 years is long enough to wait.

Today’s impasse is the result of mission creep. The story of the Civil Rights movement from 1965 to 2015 started as a quest to allow black people the same opportunities others enjoy but has shrunken into a project to show that black people can’t excel unless racism basically ceases to exist at all. This is understandable. The concrete victories tearing down Jim Crow have already happened. Smoking out the racism that remains lends a sense of purpose. And let’s face it: There’s less of a sense of electricity, urgency, importance in teaching people how to get past racism.

But the result is that we insist “What we really need to be talking about” is, say, psychological tests showing that whites have racist biases they aren’t aware of such as tending to associate black people with negative words, or white people owning up to their “Privilege,” or a television chef having said the N-word in a heated moment decades ago (or posing for a picture where her son is dressed as Desi Arnaz wearing brown makeup).

So, drama stands in for action. Follow-through is a minor concern. Too many people are reluctant to even admit signs of progress, out of a sense that their very role is to be the Cassandra rather than the problem-solver.

So, little gets done. In a history of black America, it is sadly difficult to imagine what the chapter would be about after the 1960s, other than the election of Barack Obama, which our intelligentsia is ever anxious to tell us wasn’t really important anyway. Maybe we’re getting somewhere on the police lately. But there’s a lot more to being black than the cops. There is much else to do.

This new Dream, seeking revolutionary change in how America works, is not only impossible, but based on the faulty assumption that black Americans are the world’s first group who can only excel under ideal conditions. We are perhaps the first people on earth taught to consider it insulting when someone suggests we try to cope with the system as it is—even when that person is black, or even the President.

But this “Yes, We Can’t!” assumption has never been demonstrated. No one has shown just why post-industrial conditions in the United States make achievement all but impossible for any black person not born middle-class or rich. What self-regarding group of people gives in to the idea that low-skill factory jobs moving to China spells the end of history for its own people but no one else’s?

To be sure, Bayard Rustin, Civil Rights hero and intellectual, famously argued in 1965 that automation and factory relocation left poor blacks uniquely bereft of opportunity, such that he called for the Civil Rights movement’s next step to be a call for job creation to a revolutionary degree. However, 50 years is a long time ago. Immigrants moving into black communities and forging decent existences—many of them black themselves—have shown that Rustin’s pessimism did not translate perfectly into later conditions. Today, community colleges offer a wider range of options to poor black people than they did 50 years ago. Books depicting black inner-city communities such as Alice Goffman’s On the Run and Katherine Newman’s No Shame in My Game tiptoe around the awkward fact that there are always people in such communities who acquire and keep solid jobs—something even black activists often bring up in objection to “pathologizing” such communities.

I am calling neither for stasis nor patience. However, the claim that America must “wake up” and eliminate structural racism has become more of a religious incantation than a true call to action. We must forge solutions to black America’s problems that are feasible within reality—that is, a nation in which racism continues to exist, compassion for black people from the outside will be limited and mainly formulaic (i.e. getting rid of flags), and by and large, business continues as usual. Here are some ideas for real solutions:

1. The War on Drugs must be eliminated. It creates a black market economy that tempts underserved black men from finishing school or seeking legal employment and imprisons them for long periods, removing them from their children and all but assuring them of lowly existences afterward.

2. We have known for decades how to teach poor black children to read: phonics-based approaches called Direct Instruction, solidly proven to work in the ’60s by Siegfried Engelmann’s Project Follow Through study. School districts claiming that poor black children be taught to read via the whole-word method, or a combination of this and phonics, should be considered perpetrators of a kind of child abuse. Children with shaky reading skills are incapable of engaging any other school subject meaningfully, with predictable life results.

3. Long-Acting Reproductive Contraceptives should be given free to poor black women (and other poor ones too). It is well known that people who finish high school, hold a job, and do not have children until they are 21 and have a steady partner are almost never poor. We must make it so that more poor black women have the opportunity to follow that path. The data is in: Studies in St. Louis and Colorado have shown that these devices sharply reduce unplanned pregnancies. Also, to reject this approach as “sterilizing” these women flies in the face of the fact that the women themselves rate these devices quite favorably.

4. We must revise the notion that attending a four-year college is the mark of being a legitimate American, and return to truly valuing working-class jobs. Attending four years of college is a tough, expensive, and even unappealing proposition for many poor people (as well as middle-class and rich ones). Yet poor people can, with up to two years’ training at a vocational institution, make solid livings as electricians, plumbers, hospital technicians, cable television installers, and many other jobs. Across America, we must instill a sense that vocational school—not “college” in the traditional sense—is a valued option for people who want to get beyond what they grew up in.

Note that none of these things involve white people “realizing” anything. These are the kinds of concrete policy goals that people genuinely interested in seeing change ought to espouse. If these things seem somehow less attractive than calling for revolutionary changes in how white people think and how the nation operates, then this is for emotional reasons, not political ones. A black identity founded on how other people think about us is a broken one indeed, and we will have more of a sense of victory in having won the game we’re in rather than insisting that for us and only us, the rules have to be rewritten.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: johnmcwhorter; mcwhorter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: yoe

Nothing says “I’m stupid” like protesting violence while wearing a Che Guevara t-shirt.


41 posted on 07/12/2015 9:39:18 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

“3. Long-Acting Reproductive Contraceptives should be given free to poor black women”

Well, let’s make it good for at least 50 years and mandatory. Problem solved./s


42 posted on 07/12/2015 9:41:28 AM PDT by dynachrome (We have multiplied our possessions, but reduced our values.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Black Americans need to stop waiting for Whitey to save them and just work to save themselves. Look at how many minority groups have come to America and in a couple of generations blended right in and achieved the American dream. I grew up in South Florida and saw first-hand what the Cubans did. Until blacks stop making excuses for their failures, nothing will change. I guess it is easier to blame and complain than to work to achieve something.


43 posted on 07/12/2015 9:43:18 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I tried to read this yesterday and just found it so rambling I gave up. But I’m glad I looked at this thread. I still didn’t read the whole piece, but I did read his suggestions at the end.

2 and 4 are excellent and should be realized and adopted by everyone, not just black people.

The failure to educate poor and working class children is a great failure on the part of unionized public schools. It’s a three generation (at least) disgrace. That whole system needs to be torn out root & branch. OK, you can keep the buildings but everything, and every one, else needs to go.


44 posted on 07/12/2015 9:44:45 AM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

It won’t happen

It’s gotten FAR WORSE just the last 7 years. Look at the militancy coming out of the young people. Race riots redux. The incompetence and racism of elected officials, and the kool-aid drinkers in white academia and politics.

Nothing’s going to change for the better. It will continue to worsen until TSHTF, either a wake up call from a 9/11 or a pandemic. Then they’ll coming cryin to Whitey to fix things.

It’s a given.


45 posted on 07/12/2015 9:47:42 AM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (De-fund ALL "Sanctuary Cities" And remove the idiots in charge of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Drugs, education, consequence-free sex, and education. Interesting list. I’d revise it slightly, personally.


46 posted on 07/12/2015 9:50:28 AM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Damn you beat me to it lol, but you knocked it out of the park when talking about the collective mentality that is far worse in these “hoods” then in the ignorant parts of the Appalachia, it has really become like the Borg in some these Inner City “hoods”.


47 posted on 07/12/2015 9:51:02 AM PDT by the_individual2014
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat

I too have reservations anything will change in their community....and in fact may get worse as we have seen already.

However I do think that repeating to them that the ball is in their court needs to be repeated. I for one am not open to excuses anymore.


48 posted on 07/12/2015 9:51:14 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

I cut hims more slack than many black/liberal commentators, as he has been very reasonable in the past. He seems to have drifted left, though, which is disturbing.


49 posted on 07/12/2015 10:02:52 AM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
... I myself have always been dismayed at the idea that when poor black people live together, we must expect social mayhem.

John McWhorter's NOT clueless... he's right about it being a waste of time waiting for white people to 'get racism' as defined by black extremist. It's not gonna happen.

Equal before the law is as good as it's gonna get...

Refugees from Vietnam didn't expect Americans to 'understand' their pain... they settled in, built business, and earned their way into American society. Same with Cuban refugees,Koreans, Mexicans who came here legally, and all the rest of us.... Same path...

Democrats gin up black anger and feelings of entitlement because it works for them - it keeps blacks on the Democrat Plantation. It also separates blacks from being acceptable. Democrats are attempting to do the same with Hispanics - but Hispanics aren't falling for it. This morning a Hispanic women on CNN talked about how horrible 'Sanctuary Cities' were - and how they should be shut down. She didn't buy into being pitted against Americans who want secure borders. She wasn't willing to be played...

Democrats know the stuff they're pushing blacks to demand isn't acceptable to the rest of us. That's part of the strategy. Democrats don't want blacks assimilated. They don't want Hispanics assimilated either... but Hispanics aren't falling for it...

And factory jobs within a bus ride? If industrial jobs come back democrats have lined up millions of illegals to take those jobs. Blacks are only going to get government jobs (those mostly to black women) because those jobs HELP democrats. It's another way democrats pit blacks against the rest of the racial groups in the United States.

Again, John McWhorter's NOT clueless... he's even right on some of the 'education' issues. Thanks for the post Second...

50 posted on 07/12/2015 10:05:48 AM PDT by GOPJ (If it wasn't for massive immigration the Democrat party would have already gone extinct -FeeperReese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_individual2014
Drugs, violence, prison and sex....seems to be "popular" rather than an offense or something to be corrected....


51 posted on 07/12/2015 10:06:17 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: the_individual2014
Drugs, violence, prison and sex....seems to be "popular" rather than an offense or something to be corrected....


52 posted on 07/12/2015 10:06:18 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
... I myself have always been dismayed at the idea that when poor black people live together, we must expect social mayhem.

John McWhorter's NOT clueless... he's right about it being a waste of time waiting for white people to 'get racism' as defined by black extremists. It's not gonna happen.

Equal before the law is as good as it's gonna get...

Refugees from Vietnam didn't expect Americans to 'understand' their pain... they settled in, built business, and earned their way into American society. Same with Cuban refugees,Koreans, Mexicans who came here legally, and all the rest of us.... Same path...

Democrats gin up black anger and feelings of entitlement because it works for them - it keeps blacks on the Democrat Plantation. It also separates blacks from being acceptable. Democrats are attempting to do the same with Hispanics - but Hispanics aren't falling for it. This morning a Hispanic women on CNN talked about how horrible 'Sanctuary Cities' were - and how they should be shut down. She didn't buy into being pitted against Americans who want secure borders. She wasn't willing to be played...

Democrats know the stuff they're pushing blacks to demand isn't acceptable to the rest of the racial groups living in the United States. That's part of the strategy. Democrats don't want blacks assimilated. They don't want Hispanics assimilated either... but Hispanics are catching on...

And factory jobs within a bus ride? If industrial jobs come back democrats have lined up millions of illegals to take those jobs. Blacks are only going to get government jobs (those mostly to black women) because blacks in government jobs HELPS democrats. It's another way democrats pit blacks against the rest of the racial groups in the United States.

Again, John McWhorter's NOT clueless... he's even right on some of the 'education' issues. Thanks for the post Second...

53 posted on 07/12/2015 10:09:02 AM PDT by GOPJ (If it wasn't for massive immigration the Democrat party would have already gone extinct -FeeperReese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

So attacking whites randomly in packs and gangs is just an attempt to wake us up to racism ? Who’s racism ?


54 posted on 07/12/2015 10:09:39 AM PDT by justa-hairyape (The use of the name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

He’s right that there’s a second shoe left to drop. The first shoe was whites shedding their racism, which has already happened. The second is for blacks to rise to the occasion and get their act together. “Structural racism” does not exist. What does exist is a recognition by whites and other races that blacks haven’t gotten their act together yet. The instant they do get it together is the instant they will be perceived the way they want to be perceived. It also will be the end of the Democrat party as we know it.


55 posted on 07/12/2015 10:09:42 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Funny how that “structural” racism he alludes to in his article hasn’t kept the other two major non-White ethnic groups, Asians and Hispanics, from succeeding in this country.


56 posted on 07/12/2015 10:12:18 AM PDT by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

My experience also. Living in the inner city was like having the Jerry Springer show in my front yard. Every. Single. Day.
Moved to a tiny town 10 years ago. Haven’t seen a fight, a stabbing, a shooting, or heard any rap music since. Not even once.
On Fridays sometimes I go to the fish fry at a local black church. We sit down and eat together and it’s all good. The operative word here is “church.”


57 posted on 07/12/2015 10:14:14 AM PDT by mumblypeg (I've seen the future; brother it is murder. -L. Cohen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

There is an assumption there that whites are under an obligation to care.

I don’t care. The only thing I care about is that my family is safe from violence, which disproportionally comes from the black underclass. If making blacks happy and productive citizens accomplishes that, at reasonable cost, then fine. Otherwise, if staying far away from the underclass accomplishes that, then that is fine too.

If neither of the above can be accomplished, then I will be willing to support other options — without regard to what the black community thinks of those options.


58 posted on 07/12/2015 10:17:24 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

There’s tis from “Knuckledraggin’ my life away” blog. I’ve cleaned it up a bit:

Don’t ask if you don’t wanna know

Posted on 07/10/2015 by Wirecutter

So yeah, that Confederate flag thing – I was walking past a group of black guys, all of who I’m on friendly terms with, at work today and they were talking/hollering about the Confederate flag deal. I was hearing s**t like ‘slavery’ and ‘oppression’ and ‘Jim Crow’ and ‘segregation’ but they were joking and clowning while they were doing it. I believe the proper term would be ‘shuckin’ and jivin”. Then Sam seen me and grinned and said “Hey Ken, what you think about this?”

I said ” Y’all want to make it about slavery, you go right on ahead. Nothing I can say will change your mind. But let me ask you this: Do you enjoy your standard of living today? A job, quality food and housing? And except for you divorced f****rs, a decent ride?”
They all started nodding and laughing because they were waiting for something to happen, they just didn’t know what, but they know my sense of humor. But they all pretty much agreed with me.
“Good. I’m truly happy for you.” Much eye rolling on their part. “Because if it wasn’t for slavery, 90% of you mother*****s would still be living in mud huts smearing cows**t in your hair, herding bony-ass cattle and getting mauled by lions.” Then I smiled real big at them and went on my way.


59 posted on 07/12/2015 10:19:12 AM PDT by oldfart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
Exactly right.

"... the slave dreams not of being free, but of being master."

They've just about achieved that in what is now Black Run America. Jesse Jackson claimed only whites are racist because they "have all the power and control". Well who has the power now? BLACKS ARE RACIST by his own (stupid) definition.

(Many Blacks are racist by the true definition, Jesse.)

60 posted on 07/12/2015 10:24:13 AM PDT by Zman516 (Truth is the new hate speech -- Thought-Criminal #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson