Posted on 07/07/2015 6:51:09 PM PDT by LucyT
Hillary Clinton tersely defended her use of a private email address and secret home server today during her first national interview of the 2016 presidential campaign, declaring, 'Everything I did was permitted.'
Clinton said that 'people should and do trust me' as she proclaimed that she went 'above and beyond' in providing the State Department with 55,000 pages of her emails.
She wouldn't talk about the allegations involving her family foundation, now ran by her daughter Chelsea and husband Bill, contending that she worked there for a short year and a half.
But Clinton said she was 'proud' of the 'very small role' she played in the international charity and the work that it does and said she was used to 'unsubstantiated' rumors being spread about her family after this long in the public eye.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
“Permitted” but was it still legal or illegal.
Dear Hillary Clinton,
Contrary to popular belief, the President of the United States DOES NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO LET CABINET OFFICIALS BREAK THE FEDERAL RECORDS ACT AND THE LAWS HANDLING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.
The Federal Records Act was passed by Congress and signed into law specifically for LAWLESS, LYING people like you.
You are a piece of human trash.
Sincerely,
Bryan24
AAAAARGGGGHHHH
What a lying, deceitful piece of trash.
“she proclaimed that she went ‘above and beyond’ in providing the State Department with 55,000 pages of her emails”
The WHOLE PURPOSE of the Federal Records Act is to automatically store the communications of government officials SPECIFICALLY for situations like this, where the records needs to be clear.
Hillary Clinton willfully and intentionally evaded, ignored and violated the Federal Records Act before she even started her term as SecState.
“Trust me..... because I am lying”
“Everything I did was permitted.”
...by the Secretary of State herself!
Oh? A private email server was certified and authorized to hold classified data? I had no idea, please provide the evidence.
There was an instance that I recall her saying that “there’s really no evidence of that” when she could have said that issue X never happened.
She is clearly delusional.
My trust for Clinton’s evaporated years ago.
Bill was found in court to be a perjuring liar and lost his law license.
Not to mention his finger wagging whoppers that a certain blue dress exposed.
Which further exposed Hillary’s “vast right-wing conspiracy” conjure.
She has followed up with the unforgettable tale about a video no one saw spontaneously causing an attack they already knew was planned in advance. This last one is the most puzzling to me. Why tell this obvious lie?
The other stuff was mainly to cover Bill’s bimbo eruptions and their grifting greed.
Trust me?
Chris Stevens trusted her —he’s dead. She didn’t even remember his NAME, after he died.
Vince Foster also probably trusted her —he, too, is dead.
Trusting her seems to put people at risk OF DYING.
Clintonspeak for "Who's going to stop me?"
There is nothing mysterious about how and why the Clinton's do as they do. It's well documented and corroborated. Remember Trey Gowdy's first Benghazi question back in 2012? He asked Hillary if she new anything about gun running and illegal weapons transfers operating out of Benghazi? That is the perfect example of asking a question so damning that she didn't even have to answer it. It's a classic Clinton tactic and Gowdy fell right into the trap. It would be years before the facts of the illegal arm sales from Benghazi would begin to trickle out in a drip-drip-drip.
Hitlery is the female version of Obama. No. Not again. Ever.
“Do you see the DOJ preparing an indictment?”
Which DOJ do you refer. One that has integrity and upholds the law or the one that enables corruption and refuses to enforce federal legislation?
” Trust me” Bill said to Monica “ I won’t..” Oh never mind.
Its one thing to say - “yes, this is illegal”, quite another to actually bring charges and book an individual with a crime. Anyone who thinks a protected class individual like a Clinton Obama, Bush or Gore is going to be indicted on anything is living in a dream world.
One that has integrity and upholds the law
Which one do we have?
There was an instance that I recall her saying that “there’s really no evidence of that” when she could have said that issue X never happened.
Another good example of Clintonian parsing of language.
I remember years ago, a Democrat senator, forget his name, said Clinton was an unusually good liar, or words to that effect.
She’s a psycho.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.