Exclusive–New York Times Debunked: Scott Walker’s ‘I’m Not Going Nativist’ Conversation Never Happened
Read the whole thing.
NY Times caught lying again about Walker?
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.
You can’t believe anything you read in the Slimes. They’re just a DNC mouthpiece.
It never ends with the slimes.
I’ve never STOPPED being a Nativist, and proud of it!
Paper of record! 8-track cassettes that is.
I’m a Walker guy, but this isn’t how Trump would handle this.
Trump would SUE those lyin’ sacks o’ shit.
I read the entire article but it was like reading in circles.
Denials are now being issued but the whole thing is as clear as mud and they all sound like they are in cya mode.
No one seems to know exactly what was said. Only Walker and the guy he was having an “off the record” meeting knows for sure. And it seems he kinda sorta told someone else that they had nothing to worry about with Walker.
Walker hasn’t been very stable with his immigration comments and this sounds like just more of the same.
I think we will just have to wait until he announces and clarifies his immigration stance. He can’t hide from it forever.
The NYT is scum but I think there is something there but they can’t confirm the story and everyone is denying it but they went with it anyway. They should have spoken to the Walker campaign and this Moore guy before going ahead with the story. Instead they put a title on the article that doesn’t really match the story. If there was one.
My gut feeling is that the reason Walker is so non-committal about immigration is that he really is in support of a pathway to citizenship for illegals but knows it will hurt his campaign to admit it. I don’t think he is trustworthy on this issue.
That doesn’t sound like Scott Walkers manner of speaking anyway. “Going Nativist” Who talks like that in normal conversation?
It’s the open borders scumbag Moore that’s lying. He’s a WSJ Chamber of Commerce punk.
loaded terms: nativist; pro-immigration; immigration hawk; immigration overhaul
FTNYT
With all due respect, and I do respect Walker for what he has accomplished in WI, surely you can understand why so many people believed the NYT report when Scott Walker has changed and back-tracked on various issues time after time. He is a good man but he needs to figure out what his convictions are and stand by them.
So Cruz and Trump are on the same team now.
Trump calls out Rubio for being ‘weak’ on immigration, praises Cruz
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3307788/posts
Ted Cruz has Donald Trump’s back; Reagan would be proud
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-gop/3307792/posts
The surging truth-tellers of the GOP (Ted Cruz and Don Trump)
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3307422/posts
I won’t vote for anyone who was born on foreign soil.
I won’t vote for anyone who has no record of cutting spending to state and local government employees.
Noisy bandwagons trying to divide a party for the purpose of continuing too much funding to government employees don’t decide such matters. Lawyers don’t decide such matters.
I’m the voter. I decide.
Walker is the only one with a record of having cut much government spending. Walker is not from the northeast, by the way, as someone else here stated. He’s from Colorado Springs.