[discostu]

No they are because constitutional amendments don’t pass.

Notice how all your argument focus on attacking me. While mine focus on the facts at hand. Try using facts and logic for a change. If you really think this plan can work you can answer these 4 simple questions:
In this “uni-party system”, as you say, how will Cruz get this out of committee?
How will he get it passed by congress?
How will he get it passed by the legislatures?
What judiciary has ever actually been improved by retention voting?

Very simple. And remember, if you put one single attack against me in the answer you’ve admitted you’re wrong and I’m right.

[SoConPubbie]

No they are because constitutional amendments don’t pass.

Yea, that's why we have 27 of them.

Another opinion stated as if it were fact.

[SoConPubbie]

While mine focus on the facts at hand. Try using facts and logic for a change.

See my last reply.

[SoConPubbie]

Notice how all your argument focus on attacking me.

Nope, not an attack, simply pointing out that just because you think or feel something is true, does not make it a fact, simply your opinion. And that stating that opinion as fact, is simply incorrect. Try again.

Your so-called logic that you declare you are using in your posts on this thread, does that include your divining the motivations behind why Ted Cruz proposed this solution?