Here’s an idea: Regulate gay marriage like other states regulate the right to keep and bear arms.
Institute:
Waiting periods.
Mandatory training and permitting.
Random inspections by authorities.
Mandatory liability insurance.
Mandatory health screenings and blood testing for diseases (a la Califonia’s ‘product testing’ for firearms).
Onerous security requirements (’safe storage or arsenal requirements’).
Maximum sex quotas - a la magazine capacity limits.
And many many more.
Top it all off with refusal to honor gay marriage licenses from other states unless they honor that state’s CHL like the person was at home. This is long established precedent that states do NOT have to honor other states’ licenses, the one that allows MA and CA to tell tourists to leave their protection at home.
Make it a ‘Full Faith And Credit’ clause issue. This might actually lock up the judicial system with the paradox. Make the Left have to choose between promoting gay rights and suppressing gun rights.
Why not first adopt a policy that before a couple can be licensed, the “wife” must attend several weeks of classes, held once a week, on carrying a baby, child-birth & child nursing. No exceptions, because, after all, the Supreme Court of the United States has demanded that all be treated equally.