Posted on 06/27/2015 8:12:51 AM PDT by Uncle Sham
Two of the five votes concerning same sex marriage are totally illegitimate. They were cast by Elenor Kagan and Sonia Sotomayer acting as though they are legal members of the United States Supreme Court. Any challenge to this ruling should include a challenge to their legitimacy as they were appointed by a Usurper, not a legal President.
It's time to take the gloves off and get the courage to confront the evil that is before us. I can prove that Obama is illegal just using the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three and have made this case many times on this forum. The charade has gone on long enough. We the people have the "reset" button in our hands with the Obama eligibility issue and we need to use it.
That the current federal government has declared war on on every one of us cannot be disputed. Obama's weak spot is his legitimacy as a legal President. Attacking it is our nuclear option. Someone please, hit the button.
You are correct. That's why in this case especially, we need to press the issue. We possess 100% of the TRUTH.
Forget which one it was but recall one of Obamas appointees was also counsel on Obamacare. That in and of it self should have recused them from any Ocare decisions....
We have truly entered a world where there are only 2 governing sources..
Catch 22 and Alice in Wonderland......
Roberts in particular must use these for reference purposes in his decision making on O Care
Agreed...totally ridiculous thread and diminishes FR. Obama was elected twice, he made court appointments, and there is no turning back. We can rant and rage all we want, but that’s the way it is. Don’t let it ruin your life.
I feel like a German in 1933 who could see what was coming, although everyone around them was rejoicing at Hitler’s rise to power.
In great crisis God used to raise a good man who saved the day. One must think perhaps the good Lord has abandoned America. God does not love a people whose philosophy has degenerated into the worship of eating, drinking, drugging, copulating, evacuating the bowels and snoring.
not sure why you’d say they’re not legitimate. pretty sure they were appointed.
of course, the more likely approach would be that they bought have biased opinions as they have campaigned for homo ‘marriage’ or a conflict of interest, as they’re homosexuals (at least kagan).
as such, they should have recused themselves from the ruling
The Senate has to ratify, and at any time during those processes, the Republicans could have shot them down. But they didn’t, with the usual pathetic excuses.
looks like angry old white women are determined to destroy the country.
We always feared those two would be incompetent idiots, making up excuses to promote their leftist agenda and ignoring the Constitution.
We got exactly what we expected. Now all the dumbass Senators who OK’d these 2 disasters, despite all the warning signs, can do some explaining.
The Congress can impeach a supreme court member for lack of “good behavior”. Why haven’t they???
Because voting for something we don’t like is not bad behavior. If that were the case both sides would put up all 9 justices many times over and we literally would be replacing justices as much as we change our underwear. Liberals think that Roberts and Alito are not legitimate because President Bush was appointed not elected.....both sides have issues with the justices in one way or the other. Yes did this stink? Yes. But liberals thought Citizen’s United stunk so we get some and we lose some.
“Because voting for something we don’t like is not bad behavior. “
When the court makes an obvious excursion into politics and violates the constitution, yes, it can be called bad behavior. The writers of the constitution said so.
It’s a joke that these two bimbos were ever allowed through the doors of the Supreme Court. They have no business being there. All they are is the commie libs’ way of saying, “IN YO FACE AMERICA!”
Alexander Hamilton, Federalist #78:
According to the plan of the convention, all judges who may be appointed by the United States are to hold their offices during good behavior; which is conformable to the most approved of the State constitutions and among the rest, to that of this State. Its propriety having been drawn into question by the adversaries of that plan, is no light symptom of the rage for objection, which disorders their imaginations and judgments. The standard of good behavior for the continuance in office of the judicial magistracy, is certainly one of the most valuable of the modern improvements in the practice of government. In a monarchy it is an excellent barrier to the despotism of the prince; in a republic it is a no less excellent barrier to the encroachments and oppressions of the representative body. And it is the best expedient which can be devised in any government, to secure a steady, upright, and impartial administration of the laws.
Whoever attentively considers the different departments of power must perceive, that, in a government in which they are separated from each other, the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them. The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the community. The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments.
Every one of them were political quota hires. None are competent or worthy enough to be on the supreme court.
Well the Netherlands in my opinion may be the most immoral country in the West and yet they are still going day to day without any “punishment” seems unfair to me.
What a horrible photo of those despicable three harridans. Things weren’t this bad before women joined the court. Repeal the 19th!
I agree I see no heavenly punishment. In fact some have said that when people lose they turn to another world so to speak. Moral people are being eaten by the lions and eagles. That may mean God has abandoned us and The Netherlands and no longer feels fatherly concern.
The Court has definitely exhibited bad behavior this week by making law rather than interpreting it. Alas, there is nowhere to go to deal with this except An Appeal to Heaven. The entire government is corrupted.
This is legitimate argument that has basis in fact and in the very language of the U.S. Constitution yet you somehow feel FR is diminished by it. How very Alinsky of you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.