To: MrB
I was wondering which justices thought it was OK to steal people’s stuff.
To: monkeyshine
Well, we know which ones think it’s OK for the government to require possession of what the gov’t owns anyway, which, in their opinion, would be everything.
But what gets “interesting” is that they argue from this point of view without admitting this point of view.
8 posted on
06/22/2015 7:51:49 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: monkeyshine
The Double-wide Latrina was against all.
70 posted on
06/22/2015 12:52:09 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
To: monkeyshine
Justice Sotomayor filed a solo dissent, in which she sided entirely with the USDA. “The government may condition the ability to offer goods in the market on the giving-up of certain property interests without effecting a per se taking,” Sotomayor asserted
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson