Well, we know which ones think it’s OK for the government to require possession of what the gov’t owns anyway, which, in their opinion, would be everything.
But what gets “interesting” is that they argue from this point of view without admitting this point of view.
Yeah, this slide away from a government of, by and for the people and into a government for the government has been accelerating lately. That whole “you didn’t build that” campaign was especially galling. And now the government argues in the most dishonest Machiavellian way. When they argued Obamacare it wasn’t a tax, then it became a tax. And so on. Government is of course just a reflection of the politicians and bureaucrats. We elect duplicitous, jealous, petty, small minded and selfish people so that is how our government behaves. Sorry for the rant.
The Constitution says the gov can own land for National Monuments, Military bases, and Post Offices and nothing more, so how does the BLM exist?