Replies

No its not, or every perp shooting at the police or set up for a police ambush by the druggies is a terrorist attack. It so dilutes the meaning of the word that the real terrorists just disappear into the background noise. The hype also benefits the Administration’s drive to hype domestic alleged terrorism and surveillance and down play or erase Muslim incidents.

Sounds to me like the guy said “Well if they wanna call me a terrorist, I’ll be one”.

You do have a valid and solid point. Don’t misunderstand me. But because of the above, if that is in fact true, he’s a terroist according to the definition.

I disagree. The guy set an ambush, complete with explosives, at a police station. I call that terrorism, regardless of who the perp is.

The hype also benefits the Administration’s drive to hype domestic alleged terrorism and surveillance and down play or erase Muslim incidents.

Very well said. This guy, James Boulware, as creepy as he may be (an atheistic leftist RAT and likely a homosexual), is still smallball compared to these imminent, existential threats to the Republic as we know it:

Martial law imposition by the regime (Jade Helm is but a sneak preview)
Establishment of a caliphate by hussein who talks frequently and glowingly of "...my muslim faith..." and seeks to destroy anyone who "...slanders the prophet of islam..."
Imprisonment, or worse, of Christians opposing sodomy
Gangs of marauding Holder's people wantonly attacking innocent whites, the tactics of those thugs having been given the green light of encouragement by the regime