Baltimore diversity
Posted on 06/11/2015 5:12:49 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
The Obama administration is moving forward with regulations designed to help diversify America’s wealthier neighborhoods, drawing fire from critics who decry the proposal as executive overreach in search of an “unrealistic utopia.”
A final Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) rule due out this month is aimed at ending decades of deep-rooted segregation around the country.
The regulations would use grant money as an incentive for communities to build affordable housing in more affluent areas while also taking steps to upgrade poorer areas with better schools, parks, libraries, grocery stores and transportation routes as part of a gentrification of those communities.
“HUD is working with communities across the country to fulfill the promise of equal opportunity for all,” a HUD spokeswoman said. “The proposed policy seeks to break down barriers to access to opportunity in communities supported by HUD funds.”
It’s a tough sell for some conservatives. Among them is Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.), who argued that the administration “shouldn’t be holding hostage grant monies aimed at community improvement based on its unrealistic utopian ideas of what every community should resemble.”
“American citizens and communities should be free to choose where they would like to live and not be subject to federal neighborhood engineering at the behest of an overreaching federal government,” said Gosar, who is leading an effort in the House to block the regulations.
Civil rights advocates, meanwhile, are praising the plan, arguing that it is needed to break through decades-old barriers that keep poor and minority families trapped in hardscrabble neighborhoods.
“We have a history of putting affordable housing in poor communities,” said Debby Goldberg, vice president at the National Fair Housing Alliance.
The Fair Housing Act of 1968 prohibited direct and intentional housing discrimination, such as a real estate agent not showing a home in a wealthy neighborhood to a black family or a bank not providing a loan based on someone’s race.
But HUD is looking to root out more subtle forms of discrimination that take shape in local government policies that unintentionally harm minority communities, known as “disparate impact.”
“This rule is not about forcing anyone to live anywhere they don’t want to,” said Margery Turner, senior vice president at the left-leaning Urban Institute. “It’s really about addressing long-standing practices that prevent people from living where they want to.”
“In our country, decades of public policies and institutional practices have built deeply segregated and unequal neighborhoods,” Turner said.
Children growing up in poor communities have less of a chance of succeeding in life, because they face greater exposure to violence and crime, and less access to quality education and health facilities, Turner suggested.
“Segregation is clearly a problem that is blocking upward mobility for children growing up today,” she said.
To qualify for certain funds under the regulations, cities would be required to examine patterns of segregation in neighborhoods and develop plans to address it. Those that don’t could see the funds they use to improve blighted neighborhoods disappear, critics of the rule say.
The regulations would apply to roughly 1,250 local governments.
Hans von Spakovsky, a fellow at the Heritage Foundation, called the Obama administration “too race conscious.”
“It’s a sign that this administration seems to take race into account on everything,” Spakovsky said.
Republicans are trying to block the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule. Before passing HUD’s funding bill this week, the GOP-led House approved Gosar’s amendment prohibiting the agency from following through with the rule.
Though segregationist policies were outlawed long ago, civil rights advocates say housing discrimination persists.
HUD is looking to break down many barriers, but Gosar suggested the regulation would have negative repercussions.
“Instead of living with neighbors you like and choose, this breaks up the core fabric of how we start to look at communities,” Gosar said. “That just brings unease to everyone in that area.”
“People have to feel comfortable where they live,” he added. “If I don’t feel comfortable in my own backyard, where do I feel comfortable?”
Critics of the rule say it would allow HUD to assert authority over local zoning laws. The agency could dictate what types of homes are built where and who can live in those homes, said Gosar, who believes local communities should make those decisions for themselves rather than relying on the federal government.
If enacted, the rule could depress property values as cheaper homes crop up in wealthy neighborhoods and raise taxes, Gosar warned.
It could also tilt the balance of political power as more minorities are funneled into Republican-leaning neighborhoods, he suggested.
The Supreme Court is expected to weigh in on housing discrimination in a related case in the coming weeks. At issue is whether government policies that unintentionally create a disparate impact for minority communities violate federal laws against segregation.
The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs is facing accusations that it makes low-income housing funds more readily available in minority neighborhoods than in white neighborhoods. This promotes segregation, critics argue, by encouraging minorities to continue living in poor communities where government assistance is available.
Court observers say the case could have a profound impact on HUD’s rule.
What makes a neighorhood “hardscrabble” is hardscrabble people.
The upcoming SCOTUS ruling on the use of “disparate impact” and statistics has been flying under the radar, overshadowed by King vs Burwell and Same-Sex Marriage.
But it’s just as important. If the government is prohibited from using statistical methodologies, as opposed to actual examples, to identify where racial discrimination exists and try to correct it, it makes it much harder to implement things like this.
And this is about a resident who decided to throw a end of the year party totally disregarding the rules for membership at the private neighborhood pool (she got a DJ, food, drinks and sent invites online) that is restricted to the neighborhood residents who PAY for it's upkeep, lifeguards, etc. And the place was overrun. RACE had nothing to do with it (a mob showed up where they were not allowed). Period.
Baltimore diversity
Put one next to Babs’ house in Malibu.
Stalin would be proud.
Actually, it might be fun to see so many of those RINO northeastern wealthy areas have this shoved down their throats:
Greenwich
Darien
Chappaqua . . .
Potomac
Merion
Could be fun . . .
Yes, I’ve lived under two HOAs and agree with your assessment. Rampant cronyism, and an emphasis on nitpicking stupid things to death (how DARE you replace a dead shrub without going through the Review Board!) while strenuously avoiding elephants in the room.
Once again we focus on the symptoms of a dysfunctional society and conveniently ignore the root causes.
Of course, the root causes are not politically correct topics, so truthful discussion is not possible.
I knew this was coming. We used to be able to get away from the crime and hatred. He’s setting it up in our neighborhoods, paid for by us.
"NOVATO (CBS SF) — After George Lucas ran into a buzzsaw of opposition from his wealthy Marin County neighbors when he tried to expand his Skywalker Ranch studio, the filmmaker might be getting some payback with plans for one of the largest affordable housing projects in the Bay Area.
Lucas, the Star Wars creator is offering his own property in west Marin County off Lucas Valley Road near Novato for the project, with plans for a community of 224 homes right where neighbors said no to his studio expansion.
“He said ‘we’ve got enough millionaires here. What we need is some houses for regular working people,’” Lucas’ lawyer Gary Giacomini said.
Lucas says he will pay for the project himself...."
No, silly, this isn’t intended for the elites.
Isn’t this what used to be called “Block busting” back in the 1950s and 1960s?
Realtors would sell a home to a black couple in a white neighborhood, decreases property values, causes whites to flee and the realtors snap up the houses at very low prices for resale to the blacks.
I remember some nice neighborhoods that went from nice to slums almost overnight.
No, they show anyone with more than two working brain cells why some cultures (not races, cultures) are incompatible with others.
No it's not.
Obama has practiced Quartering criminal illegals
with incurable diseases, already.
Now he will target his enemy: Americans.
“Wonder how long it’ll be before Obama starts ordering single family homeowners to give up their spare bedrooms for “poor families?”
Likely the administration will simply issue and executive order allowing HUD to target specific “affluent” neighborhoods and then use federal funds to buy houses in those neighborhoods, as they come on the market. The purchased houses can then be sold or rented at a reduced price to people who could not normally afford them. Likely the beneficiaries of this program will be selected with the help of community organizers and activists to ensure the new communities are blessed with new neighbors who will bring the provide the complete urban experience.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.