Posted on 06/09/2015 12:51:26 PM PDT by Red Badger
A married Army general on Tuesday introduced his spouse at a Pentagon event that featured lots of top brass, including Defense Secretary Ashton Carter as the keynote speaker.
What made this seemingly routine introduction noteworthy is that Brig. Gen. Randy S. Taylor introduced his husband, Lucas.
“My husband Lucas is sitting up front here,” Gen. Taylor said of the man in the same row as Mr. Carter, Army Secretary John McHugh and other senior officials. He said Lucas has subjugated his own career to support the general’s frequent moves over an 18-year relationship.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
If we treated winos in the same manner as homos, they would get all the booze they could drink and have their self-abusive lifestyle celebrated and promoted.
Well, it should keep the muslims out.
BARF!!!
With the emphasis on everything except war fighting, I wounder how the US military would stand up against a first rate opponent?
I wonder who got purged so that Brigadier General Mrs. Randy Taylor could get his star?
Hell in a handbasket.
Unbelievable.
Game over. A BGen with a homosexual butt buddy being called his “husband”?
Never thought I’d live to see this.
You gotta be kidding.
This means he has lied on every Security Clearance interview since he was a Major. All field grade officers require a clearance that covers issues that could make them, or could have made them vulnerable to blackmail.
Even if “Gay” is “acceptable” now, homosexual activity certainly was not when he was a Major and LTC and would have precluded any clearance.
It’s also not a question of whether or not he mentioned it. The written form, which must be completed in longhand and signed by the applicant as part of the Single Scope Background Investigation every applicant must pass to be promoted or even remain at that grade, specifically asks that question a number of times, in various ways.
Such lies are a serious Court Martial offense and cause for an immediate revocation of his clearance.
FHA
Some things a just so obvious an alert was really unnecessary.....................
I guess that’s one of the Executive Orders that Obozo has given that countermands any retribution for that infraction..................
Don’t Christians still make up the backbone of the officer corps? What if they simply resigned their commissions and moved on with life? Why isn’t their an organized movement to do this? They need to recognize that the US military has abandoned Christians, for good. Most can transition pretty easily to civilian life.
Christian revival, or civil war.
Don’t see any other choices at this point.
GOD help us.
Why do you think the homos like to get HR positions? Never put a homo in HR or your organization will be overrun with them.
Ah hell. just nuke the whole damn place.
I think you are opting for my program.
I don’t recognize the Army I served.
5.56mm
It is NOT doom and gloomisim to say that it is over for America. When perversion is celebrated by a GENERAL IN THE ARMED FORCES THAT PERVERSION IS ABOVE ANY REPROACH.
ARTICLE 107, UCMJ:
Making a False Official Statement
The elements to be proven under this article are:
That at a specific time and place, the accused made a certain official statement to a specific person or signed a specific official document.
That the statement or document was completely false or partially false in a specific manner.
That the accused was fully aware at the time of making the statement or signing the document that it was false.
That the accused intended to deceive by giving this false statement or signing the false document.
Maximum Punishment for Violation of Article 107
The accused faces dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances and five years confinement if found guilty.
Article 133, UCMJ: Conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman:
Any commissioned officer, cadet, or midshipman who is convicted of conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
—10 U.S.C. § 933 (effective 2008)
The elements are:
That the accused did or omitted to do certain acts; and
That, in the circumstances, these acts or omissions constituted conduct unbecoming an officer and gentleman.[1]
Here “officer” is understood to include commissioned officers, cadets, and midshipmen of both sexes, hence the more common term conduct unbecoming. A gentleman is understood to have a duty to avoid dishonest acts, displays of indecency, lawlessness, dealing unfairly, indecorum, injustice, or acts of cruelty.
There is no statute of limitations on these. He was guilty then so he is guilty now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.