Posted on 06/02/2015 11:39:19 AM PDT by Kaslin
Ann Coulter lives up to her reputation of issuing warnings and political commentary that nobody else dares to say in her newest book, "Adios, America!" It's aptly titled; she makes the case that it is goodbye to the America we know and love if we don't stop diluting our population with people who don't love America, don't respect our Constitution and laws, don't even speak our language, and commit all sorts of unspeakable crimes.
"Adios, America!" brims with the scathing humor that has made Coulter's previous 10 books bestsellers.
Coulter gives hundreds of specific examples of major crimes committed by illegal immigrants and, in particular, crimes against very young women and girls. She shows the devious ways that the media conceal the fact that these horrendous crimes are committed by illegal immigrants whom our government never should have let into our country.
The media cover-up doesn't conceal merely the nationality of these criminals or the frequency of their crimes. The media cover-up also conceals the depravity of these crimes, which are so horrific I can't bring myself to describe them in this column.
"Adios, America!" spells out chapter and verse on the attitudes and customs of the foreigners Obama is welcoming by the millions into America, including their horrific mistreatment of very young women, some even younger than teens. Where are the feminists when we need them to shout about the "war on women"?
There are many devious ways that foreigners can get into the U.S. and then cash in on our generous welfare system. One route is the family unification policy, which qualifies for entry all varieties of alleged relatives, plus fake marriages by foreigners to U.S. citizens.
The racket called asylum allows a foreigner to claim without proof that he faces persecution in his home country, and then he can qualify for admission to the U.S. plus generous financial support by the U.S. taxpayers. The Tsarnaev family, whose sons bombed the Boston Marathon, were admitted after phony claims of persecution and then cashed in for $100,000 in U.S. handouts.
Coulter exposes the giant deception covered by the trendy liberal goal of "diversity," which excused dumping 100,000 Somalis on Minnesota. We've allowed 30 million Mexicans to settle inside our country; that's one-quarter of Mexico's entire population of 120 million.
In 2011, the Government Accountability Office reported that the minimum estimate of criminal aliens in U.S. prisons and jails was 351,000, a figure that includes only a portion of the criminal aliens incarcerated in state and local facilities.
Coulter asks a relevant question: "Why can't we adopt Israel's policy on immigration?" What do you think Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would do if thousands of Israelis were being murdered by uninvited foreigners coming illegally into Israel?
If you guessed, "Give them in-state college tuition, driver's licenses, and free medical care," you would be laughed at. But that's what President Obama gives to our illegal aliens.
Coulter's book quotes scores of news reports describing the horrendous crimes committed by aliens against U.S. citizens, but somehow the news reports consistently fail to mention that the criminal was an alien. Here's a typical headline: "Man wanted for Raping Girl, 11, Robbing Her Family." The news story never used the word "immigrant," but described the criminal only as a "man" or "a 26-year-old man."
To illustrate the false slogan that "diversity is our strength," Coulter tells what happened to A.G. Currie Middle School in Tustin, Calif., which flew 65 foreign flags to make it a "model multicultural school" because, as its principal said in 1992, "we are looking to build on our diversity as a strength." By 2009, the school had become 91 percent Hispanic. Coulter's comment: "Nine percent more Mexicans, and it will have achieved perfect diversity."
When we're told we can't fence our southern border because "fences don't work" -- because people can always go over, under or around them -- Coulter responds: That's like saying "wheels don't work" because you might have a flat tire. And, remember, the Great Wall of China is still doing its job after centuries.
A new Gallup poll reports that Americans are becoming more liberal on social issues. In fact, Americans are becoming more conservative on many social issues such as pro-life, and so our candidates don't have to take any more advice from those highly paid strategists who tell them to avoid mention of social issues.
Americans want our borders closed to this flow of anti-American foreigners and criminals. Thank you, Ann Coulter, for alerting Americans to how Obama and the Democrats are destroying the land we love.
It made me proud to come back home from Europe 20 years ago! But know the whack left attempts to make us Turd World also...! I HATE LIBERALS! Everyone should be required to live overseas for one year and then return and lets see how they friggin vote!!!
I think we also need a moratorium on legal immigration.
A person who didn’t know you or your views would deduce that you believe the following from your post:
1.) Conservatives support the KKK
2.) Conservatives are filled with hate
3.) Conservatives are longing to use the “N” word
4.) Conservatives embrace the John Birch Society
I don’t know whether the country is moving to the right, but I can certainly envision circumstances where that might happen. But the way you described it, I strongly disagree with those characterizations.
I don’t know but you must have missed it. It is very difficult and takes a long time for legal immigrant to get a visa, while illegals can just come whenever they want to and are welcomed by the left with open arms
Correct
See someone on your mother’s side arrived from someplace else in the US. He or she was not born here. Your ancestors on your fathers side were greeted by the Indians, weren’t they? That makes the Indians the real natives not your ancestors
Today, this issue is not that we have a flood of immigrants, because this has happened before.
There are two issues: There is a flood of ILLEGAL immigrants entering this country, and the way those illegal immigrants are becoming part of our society is quite different. They are starting off as LAWBREAKERS and CRIMINALS.
The problem with the second part is this: in the past, people came here because they wanted to be Americans. They wanted to assimilate. They wanted to make a living and get ahead. They loved the idea of being Americans, and adopting our languages, laws, views, and values.
The current flood of illegal immigrants do not want to assimilate. They not only do NOT want to BE Americans, they are being encouraged to NOT be “Americans’. They dislike what America stands for and want to change it, they do not want to adopt our laws, views, values, and most especially, our language which has been a huge unifying factor in this country.
Those are the problems.
I disagree. I do not have an issue with legal immigration and the associated processes.
Most conservatives are not against legal immigration, as much as the left tries to paint us that way (and they do successfully)
The problem is, even legal immigration is flawed. Currently, we seem to be inclined to decline immigration to qualified applicants to promote the immigration of people who don’t want to assimilate and don’t have either marketable skills or the desire to obtain them.
The process should be rigorous, and we should have set standards that promote the acceptance of immigrants who WILL assimilate and add valuable or at least usable skills to our workforce.
Just my opinion.
Yes. That is the root of the problem. If the left likes it, it isn’t good for this country.
A million illegal Irish immigrants are at worst a labor issue and they and their children will be totally assimilated in one generation. A million Legal Somali immigrants (and most Somalis are here legally) are a disaster as will be their U.S. citizen children and their children's children.
The third world migrants who turned Ronald Reagan's state into Mexifornia mostly came here legally.
The most important things about immigrants are where they're from and how many arrive. Their possession of legal papers or not is of less importance.
I did qualify my support for legal immigration.
I stand by my statement: we, as conservatives, are NOT against legal immigration. We are against HOW legal immigration is being conducted.
And we ARE completely and unequivocally against ILLEGAL immigration, and amnesty for those criminals.
See my post at #48. I think we both see the same issues, though we may vary a bit on some aspects.
Those “legal” immigrants that came in under Reagan were NOT the kind of immigrants we should be welcoming with open arms.
If Islam ever fundamentally changes and becomes peaceful for say, a hundred years, with its Jihad and other supremacy doctrines ending... I might change my mind.
That is a different thing. I have always found this to be an interesting and illuminating description from Dr. Peter Hammond’s book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat. www.frontline.org.za/books_videos/sti.htm
As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness.
At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs [Europe, Australia, USA and Japan]. Six percent of US prison inmates are Muslim. Like any other minority, they won’t integrate, but work to build their own separate community.
From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. South Africa’s Muslim population is 2%, but they control 35% of the businesses, a large percentage of the banks and have five Cabinet seats while Christians (77% of the population) have none.
They will push for the introduction of halaal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves (along with threats for failure to comply).
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia; Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world, but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. (Ei: car-burnings in France last October.) Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats.
After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning (India, Mindanao, Philippines).
At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare [Indonesia].
From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya (infidel tax). (Sudan, Kosovo, Lebanon and Egypt).
After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide [Western Papua (New Guinea), Iran, Biafra, Turkey and North Nigeria]. 10
0% will usher in the peace of “Dar-es-Salaam” - House of Peace - as in Saudi Arabia, Libya and Yemen.
I will say that I work in an environment with muslims, and I do not have issues with any of them. Most of them appear to be very secular (which in some muslim eyes makes them apostates)
But I do not want to test the theories of increasing muslim populations as described in the previous post.
So what?
100,000 years ago, there were no human beings (homo sapiens) living any place in the world except sub-Saharan Africa.
Today, outside of Africa, every person in every country in the world is the descendant of an immigrant.
Why is being the descendant of an immigrant in the USA somehow different to you, somehow more important to you, than being a descendant of an immigrant in Japan or Germany or Mexico?
Where’d the Indians come from, smart guy?
You are right Nowhere Man. we were destroyed by our own success.—a big blow up is a comin’ It might well be a new Civil war or a new revolution. It might be an underground resistence movement—Things got to change in this land—we are not a nation of minorities—all acting as tyrants.
The logistics were different; they had to travel all the way across the Atlantic on ships. Plus, with the Irish, the influx of immigrants from Ireland ( in the wake of the potato famine ), - proved to be finite. Even the "know nothings" came to realize that. There was always an ebb and a flow. Secondly the there wasn't the great disparity between the education/skill level of those immigrants and the native born, - like there is now.
In the 20th Century, there was basically an immigration "time out" (reduction) for several decades, while the country had a chance to assimilate various groups.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.