Skip to comments.
US affirms ‘ironclad’ promise to defend Philippines
GMA News / Agence France-Presse ^
| May 28, 2015
Posted on 05/27/2015 7:03:54 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter told his Philippine counterpart on Wednesday that Washington's pledge to defend the Pacific nation remains "ironclad" and called for an end to land reclamation in the South China Sea, officials said.
In talks in Hawaii with Voltaire Gazmin, Philippine secretary of national defense, the Pentagon chief "reaffirmed" the strong ties between the two countries and discussed territorial disputes in the contested waters of the South China Sea, where Beijing has been at loggerheads with the Philippines and other states in the region.
Citing Washington's mutual defense treaty with Manila, Carter "stressed that the US commitment to defend the Philippines is ironclad," the Pentagon said in a statement.
The meeting came as Carter embarks on a tour of Asia and amid rising tensions over Beijing's massive effort to build artificial islands in the South China Sea.
Carter and Gazmin "agreed that all parties involved in the South China Sea should seek a peaceful resolution of disputes, immediately halt land reclamation, and stop further militarization of disputed features," the statement said....
(Excerpt) Read more at gmanetwork.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: china; obama; philippines; southchinasea; trustme
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: ought-six
“The Filipinos were utterly brutalized by the Japanese.”
And when the Japanese were losing, the Filipinos paid them back with interest. There were darned few “prisoners of war”.
21
posted on
05/27/2015 7:40:21 PM PDT
by
The Antiyuppie
("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
In the past, such statements actually meant something. It would give American allies a warm and fuzzy feeling knowing that if the sh*t hits the fan Uncle Sam has got your back.
These days only America’s enemies get warm and fuzzy feelings when such things are said.
America has lost alot of trust from its closest friends under Obama. It will take decades and likely much blood before anyone will believe that America’s word is its bond again.
22
posted on
05/27/2015 7:44:45 PM PDT
by
Dundee
(They gave up all their tomorrows for our today's.)
To: ought-six
“I didnt mention Japan because Filipinos have not forgotten WWII.”
Ironically, Japan is the only nation in the region with the navy, air forces, and strategic interest to help them out.
23
posted on
05/27/2015 7:45:08 PM PDT
by
tcrlaf
(They told me it could never happen in America. And then it did....)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
If it came from Obama, you can’t believe a word of it.
24
posted on
05/27/2015 8:06:55 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(A free society canÂ’t let the parameters of its speech be set by murderous extremists.)
To: Norm Lenhart
They’ll need a delivery system, too.
25
posted on
05/27/2015 8:08:14 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(A free society canÂ’t let the parameters of its speech be set by murderous extremists.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
It’s truly pathetic what the GOpDNc cabal has reduced the world to.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
What promise? The Manila oligarchs tossed us. They’ll do just fine on their own.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Just last week he used “ironclad” in relation to Israel. I didn’t believe it then either.
28
posted on
05/27/2015 8:19:34 PM PDT
by
FoxInSocks
("Hope is not a course of action." -- M. O'Neal, USMC)
To: 2ndDivisionVet; blueyon; KitJ; T Minus Four; xzins; CMS; The Sailor; ab01; txradioguy; ...
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Ironclad Promises become void at the instsnt the promissee is attacked.
30
posted on
05/27/2015 8:21:16 PM PDT
by
arthurus
(It's true!)
To: arthurus
A promise from the US?
Let’s ask all the people we have betrayed in the past 6 years.
31
posted on
05/27/2015 8:25:20 PM PDT
by
ladyjane
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Let's see, the United States is now committed to wage war at the option of the Philippine islands against the world's most populous nation, the world's largest economy, a nuclear power nation with intercontinental ballistic missiles, on behalf of a nation that just kicked us out.
And we got in return
?
32
posted on
05/27/2015 9:20:39 PM PDT
by
nathanbedford
("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
To: nathanbedford
Don’t worry, he didn’t mean it.
33
posted on
05/27/2015 9:21:38 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(You can help: https://donate.tedcruz.org/c/FBTX0095/)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Uh oh is right. Wherever O’bastard finds “strong ties,” he does his level best to demolish them.
34
posted on
05/27/2015 9:41:55 PM PDT
by
ProtectOurFreedom
(For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not, no explanation is possible)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Are we now drawing meaningless "red lines" through Taiwan, Japan, Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia and God knows where else which only for the whole world to see that we have no policy respecting China just as we have no coherent policy respecting militant Islam?
I have long been posting on these threads that Obama is a very, very dangerous President who might involve America in war by blunder or by Machiavellian calculation on behalf of his communist ideology. If Obama senses that the value which he considers important, to be distinguished of course from threats to American national security,( such as real ideological shibboleths of the left), he is entirely capable of committing us to war. I do not believe for one second that Obama is a left-wing pacifist, I believe he is, like all communists, utterly unmoved by bloodshed on behalf of the cause. I believe he is also equally unmoved by threats to the security of the United States. He is moved only by that which advances or retards his ideology.
That is why American foreign policy appears so incoherent. We are trying to understand Obama's policies according to a false matrix. It is almost impossible for Americans to believe that their president has no interest in their security but has a total commitment to a Marxist ideology.
35
posted on
05/27/2015 9:48:05 PM PDT
by
nathanbedford
("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
To: Shadow44
“Ask Saigon about Washingtons track record with following through on its promises.”
And Ukraine.
36
posted on
05/28/2015 12:27:08 AM PDT
by
Paulie
(America without Christianity is like a Chemistry book without the periodic table.)
To: ought-six; 2ndDivisionVet
The PI just got screwed. The PI needs to align with S. Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam, Australia, and India. I didnt mention Japan because Filipinos have not forgotten WWII. The Filipinos were utterly brutalized by the Japanese.They brutalized a lot of people, but there are a lot of Japanese living in the Philippines, and many Filipinos want to work in Japan too, so yes, it happened, but the relationship between Japan and the Philippines is pretty good, and yes, my other half is a Filipina, so I have a pretty good idea what is going on.
37
posted on
05/28/2015 1:47:20 AM PDT
by
Mark17
(Through all my days, and then in Heaven above, my song will silence never, I'll worship Him forever)
To: ought-six
"I didnt mention Japan because Filipinos have not forgotten WWII."
In the not so distant past, you would have been correct. However, that is now 70 years ago and a large majority of those Filipinos who hate the Japanese are now gone. That and the current mutual enemy of China has drawn the Phillipines and Japan into closer ties. They just announced that they are conducting a joint naval excercise in the South China Sea, but stressed it has nothing to do with the current situation with China. Yeah right! There has also been a number of diplomatic visits and joint statements put out between the countries in the last few years.
Joint Naval Exercise
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Unless obama says we won’t, then we wont.
39
posted on
05/28/2015 4:44:29 AM PDT
by
uncitizen
(The GOPE is bruisin' for a Cruz'n)
To: nathanbedford
"Let's see, the United States is now committed to wage war at the option of the Philippine islands against the world's most populous nation, the world's largest economy, a nuclear power nation with intercontinental ballistic missiles, on behalf of a nation that just kicked us out."
Not just on behalf of the Phillipines, but also South Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Taiwain, Australia. We have these same pacts with our NATO partners in Europe, has that concerned you (now going on almost 70 years)? We used to have one with many of these countries years ago called SEATO. Many of these same countries also fought with us in Korea and Vietnam (Many Fillipinos fought in Vietnam). The difference between our NATO partnerships and these (that I can see) is that we have credible partners here who are all building up their Naval forces, conducting joint exercises and actually getting prepared to be in a partnership. Over in NATO, the only country that spends 2% of it's GDP (per NATO rules) is us. Perhaps someone like Poland does also, but the majority of them don't. That's not the case in Southeast Asia.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson