Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marine court-martialed for refusing to remove Bible verse
Foxnews.com/opinion ^ | 5-26-2015 | Todd Starnes

Posted on 05/26/2015 1:50:25 PM PDT by servo1969

A United States Marine was convicted at a court-martial for refusing to remove a Bible verse on her computer – a verse of Scripture the military determined “could easily be seen as contrary to good order and discipline.”

The plight of Lance Corporal Monifa Sterling seems unbelievable – a member of the Armed Forces criminally prosecuted for displaying a slightly altered passage of Scripture from the Old Testament: “No weapon formed against me shall prosper.”

Sterling, who represented herself at trial, was convicted February 1, 2014 in a court-martial at Camp Lejune, North Carolina after she refused to obey orders from a staff sergeant to remove the Bible verses from her desk.

She was found guilty of failing to go to her appointed place of duty, disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer, and four specifications of disobeying the lawful order of a noncommissioned officer.

The Christian Marine was given a bad conduct discharge and a reduction in rank from lance corporal to private.

Both lower court and the appellate court ruled that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act did not apply to her case because displaying a Bible verse does not constitute religious exercise.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: christian; discharge; homosexualagenda; indiana; marines; mikepence; rfra
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: servo1969; Clintonfatigued; Bender2; PhilCollins; fieldmarshaldj; NFHale; AuH2ORepublican

It’s a wonder anyone is still willing to serve in the military under these conditions. The next Republican Secretary of Defense has some work to do.


41 posted on 05/26/2015 3:04:35 PM PDT by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I agree. We had a case of two very stubborn women locking horns and playing for power. In some cases we have to remember, the military has a right to dictate how their material is to be treated or maintained. It’s not out property, not really.
She wasted a lot of time defending herself when the other side had everything to gain and very little to lose. They could have drug this ego war out for another couple of years.


42 posted on 05/26/2015 3:10:48 PM PDT by lee martell (The sa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

God’s Word trumps all earthly law.


43 posted on 05/26/2015 3:18:47 PM PDT by Birdsbane ("Onward through the fog!" ... Oat Willie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impy; servo1969; Clintonfatigued; Bender2; PhilCollins; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican

Going to take more than just a “Republican” SecDef to undo the damage this admin and his f***ed up party has wrought.

Going to take a LOT more.

But I agree with some of the other posters. You learn REAL fast that the equipment does NOT belong to you; it’s US GI (now, technically, you can argue that it’s TAXPAYER property, but that’s an argument you will lose...).

She should have obeyed the lawful order (yeah.. I know... I can hear the “HALE!!! YOU TOO?!? WTF!” comin’ through the internet already...)


44 posted on 05/26/2015 3:22:37 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Birdsbane; servo1969

“..God’s Word trumps all earthly law....”

Yeah, that’ll work...


45 posted on 05/26/2015 3:24:04 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

So let me get this right. According to caesar’s courts, displaying a Bible verse doesn’t constitute religious exercise.

And what is it that Christians seek to gain by appealing to caesar?


46 posted on 05/26/2015 3:25:49 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat (The ballot is a suggestion box for fools and slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NFHale

Your sarcasm may condemn you, as it already has the earthly powers that be. Mark 3:29 - “...but whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven it.


47 posted on 05/26/2015 3:34:29 PM PDT by Birdsbane ("Onward through the fog!" ... Oat Willie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia

The military is an authoritarian socialist subculture.


48 posted on 05/26/2015 3:36:12 PM PDT by captain_dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
the Religious Freedom Restoration Act did not apply to her case because displaying a Bible verse does not constitute religious exercise.

It didn't display all by itself. It took an action to make it display.

What about speaking it out loud?

What about speaking it out loud at a school?

What about speaking it out loud at a graduation or a football game?

What about speaking it out loud at school in a club of like-minded students?

All of that is outlawed, but this soldier "displaying" a Bible verse is not covered?

Do you get the sense that everyone - at every level of government - is just making it up as they go to suit their particular agenda at the time?

-PJ

49 posted on 05/26/2015 3:37:48 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Wonder how she got away with that haircut.


50 posted on 05/26/2015 3:41:12 PM PDT by Anoreth (It is not moth eaten. It is superb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Birdsbane

Well, that’s too bad isn’t it?

You believe what you want, others will too.


51 posted on 05/26/2015 3:43:37 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: NFHale

Well, that’s too bad isn’t it?

You believe what you want, others will too.

__________________________________

Christians are seeing the dismantling of our country’s founding core beliefs and it is very frustrating to say the least. It is just a matter of time. . . . http://www.patburt.com/


52 posted on 05/26/2015 3:52:15 PM PDT by Maudeen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.


53 posted on 05/26/2015 3:54:18 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (The so-called Southern Poverty Law Center is a hate group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Here, the appellant taped a biblical quotation in three places around her workstation, organized in a fashion to “represent the trinity.” While her explanation at trial may invoke religion, there is no evidence that posting signs at her workstation was an “exercise” of that religion in the sense that such action was “part of a system of religious belief.” Indeed, the appellant never told her SSgt that the signs had a religious connotation and never requested any religious accommodation to enable her to display the signs. Instead, the record supports the conclusion that the appellant was simply placing what she believed to be personal reminders that those she considered adversaries could not harm her. Such action does not trigger the RFRA.

The full opinion of the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is here. It's worth a read. This article doesn't quite capture what was going on here - based on the facts laid out in the opinion, it sounds like she did not seem to think that orders applied to her, and the "signs" thing was just one small part of that bigger issue.

54 posted on 05/26/2015 3:58:45 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

Got that right.


55 posted on 05/26/2015 4:01:49 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Maudeen

Then fight back.

Learn how to beat the enemy at his own game.

Instead of sitting around throwing Bible verses and complaining about how bad it is, do something constructive to start punching back.

Start with absolute refusal to comply, and go from there.


56 posted on 05/26/2015 4:13:08 PM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Imo, it’s that any SNCO, USMC or otherwise, could find that bit of nothing in any way offensive.

Douchebag needs to see the Corpsman to have his Sniveling Astro Turf Gland removed.


57 posted on 05/26/2015 4:21:15 PM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45
Quoting #57: The proper response to a lawful order is not “Why?”

An order that violates the U.S. Constitution is not a "lawful order."

58 posted on 05/26/2015 5:11:30 PM PDT by montag813 (Pray for Israel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Are you familiar with the saying “you may beat the rap but you won’t beat the ride”? It applies here in the same way it applies at the side of the road when attempting to adjudicate a ticket with the traffic cop. Further, by establishing the Uniform Code of Military Justice in the interest of good order and discipline, the Congress determined that the special circumstances of military service required structure not found in the Constitution.

At some point in the appeals process, there may be some finding more aligned to your point of view. However, that won’t be the daily reality of cheerful obedience to the orders of your superior NCO/officer.


59 posted on 05/26/2015 7:55:00 PM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

They were being attacked before Obama. It started under George Bush. Obama is continuing it.


60 posted on 05/26/2015 7:57:33 PM PDT by Carry me back (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson