The point is nobody except you knew what DD meant, write it out rather than some cutesy initialization nonsense.
Second is you have no idea what happened and why that night and neither does anybody else. Some say it was a kidnap attempt and others say it was a weapons buyback. The weapons buyback makes more sense than a high risk Ambassador kidnap. Either way he ended up murdered and they lied about a video.
That is the main point of the post, why is nobody in the establishmedia curious? They are not curious because either case makes their guy look bad. LOLMODEUPGPIESKI!!!
DD was not meant to be “cutesyâ€...its a pretty common expression in finance......and you’re right..i have no idea what actually happened...I based my assumptions on a likely scenario after doing some research.....as for the buy back scenairo.....that appears to be a false flag to cover for a much bigger impeachable scandal.....they could survive a buy back story....the complete draw-down on security is a big key....they wouldn’t need to “intentionally” draw down security for a buy back scheme...(watch the hearings about the lack of security)but again...Do your own DD!
Search Results
Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread 24 May 2015
www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3292991/posts?page...
Free Republic
36 mins ago - LOLMODEUPGPIESKI!!! 84 posted on Sun May 24 2015 07:22:17 GMT-0700 ( PDT) by bray (Cruz to the WH). [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To ...
LOL! You made Google with that, Bray.