To: nickcarraway
So the FL Supreme Court was under the impression that a criminal in the process of perpetrating violent crime is entitled to an expectation of privacy. Courts that allow the privacy wiretap laws to restrict the taping of crimes in progress make a mockery of law.
This guys victim needs to lure him into her home, kill him, and claim self-defense.
2 posted on
05/24/2015 12:07:03 AM PDT by
FredZarguna
(We are vain and we are blind/I hate people when they're not polite.)
To: nickcarraway
I don’t understand the legal reason or the principle behind not allowing the recording to be admissible evidence. No criminals ever give permission to be recorded.
3 posted on
05/24/2015 12:13:45 AM PDT by
4rcane
To: nickcarraway
That law should be ignored when criminal activity is recorded.
It’s a stupid law. If I am talking to someone and want to record what happens for my safety and security, I have that right.
They let police violate this law.
7 posted on
05/24/2015 1:05:35 AM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: nickcarraway
In Ohio, only one party must be aware of recording. Still, these laws forbidding a criminal act's recording being submittable is akin to gun control: only criminals benefit from them.
14 posted on
05/24/2015 5:13:27 AM PDT by
goodwithagun
(My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
To: nickcarraway
he is now free and an easy target
18 posted on
05/24/2015 5:36:11 AM PDT by
bert
((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... No peace? then no peace!)
To: nickcarraway
This needed a permission law?
19 posted on
05/24/2015 6:06:14 AM PDT by
bgill
(CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
To: nickcarraway
If a third person had witnessed the rape, would that witness’s testimony be allowed in court against the rapist?
One could argue that, that third person is ‘means of recording’ for the event, in the same way as a video or audio recording. Would the court dismiss the witness as not being legally allowed to ‘remember’ the crimes.
20 posted on
05/24/2015 6:15:29 AM PDT by
adorno
(a)
To: nickcarraway
California Superior Court Judge M. Marc Kelly will be having none of this nonsense in his court. Any child rape victim trying to secure evidence in his or her rape will be severely dealt with.
21 posted on
05/24/2015 1:21:02 PM PDT by
DPMD
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson