Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: SeekAndFind
2 posted on
05/22/2015 2:38:00 PM PDT by
gov_bean_ counter
(Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
To: SeekAndFind
3 posted on
05/22/2015 2:44:09 PM PDT by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: SeekAndFind
Regarless of his standing at the time, you just know they will have Huckleberry as one of them. And whoever else Rove tells them to have on.
To: SeekAndFind
You mean Jon Huntsman won't be able to crash the debate and come across as a front runner? / sarc.
5 posted on
05/22/2015 2:45:27 PM PDT by
TMA62
(Al Sharpton - The North Korea of race relations)
To: SeekAndFind
BTW, they counted Scott Walker twice.
6 posted on
05/22/2015 2:46:11 PM PDT by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: SeekAndFind
SOOOOOooooo..... Smaller stages .. Bigger ratings.. More intense interchanges?
One can only hope..
7 posted on
05/22/2015 2:46:40 PM PDT by
NormsRevenge
(SEMPER FI!! - Monthly Donors Rock!!)
To: SeekAndFind
”… will feature only candidates who average in the top 10 in the most recent polls, ..." So whoever is producing the poll results is deciding who the top 10 contenders are. Although I think that most conservatives will probably be happy ok with the top 10, such an approach is questionable.
To: SeekAndFind
Sounds fine to me.
The also rans are annoying.
11 posted on
05/22/2015 2:51:38 PM PDT by
TexasFreeper2009
(You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, & R)
To: SeekAndFind
There’s an atypically good idea...
12 posted on
05/22/2015 2:52:40 PM PDT by
Redbob
(W.W.J.B.D.: "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
To: SeekAndFind
Why call ten people standing at podiums with 5-6 minutes of actual speaking time a debate?
To: SeekAndFind
The Fox News preferred Ten
- Carly Fiorina
- Marco Rubio
- Ben Carson
- Mike Huckabee
- Lindsey Graham
- Scott Walker
- Jeb Bush
- Chris Christie
- John Kasich
- Donald Trump
26 posted on
05/22/2015 3:01:45 PM PDT by
Bratch
To: SeekAndFind
Foxnews reports the debate! Who decides?
To: SeekAndFind
All that matters to me is that Cruz is on the stage.
29 posted on
05/22/2015 3:05:45 PM PDT by
TexasFreeper2009
(You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, & R)
To: SeekAndFind
enough of these useless political games
America needs to be led by enlightened warrior leadership
not by lawyers and blowhards .
We love our country and want it to survive ? We have to fight , really fight for it . Letting the fraudulent vote process to continue as it has degenerated into will ensure our demise .
To: SeekAndFind
So Pat is out?
Pat Paulsen
34 posted on
05/22/2015 3:12:45 PM PDT by
ETL
(ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: SeekAndFind
Sixteen candidates? That’s at least double the size the field ought to be.
35 posted on
05/22/2015 3:14:28 PM PDT by
Colonel_Flagg
("Politics is downstream from culture." -- Andrew Breitbart)
To: SeekAndFind
And who decides who is in the top 10?
ALL of them should have their moment to show what they are about to the public. For many uninformed voters, this might be the only chance they’ll see this candidate and IMo, a debate stage is a good way to see how that person handles stress, pressure and answering questions a President would have to answer. It’s also a good way to see what the candidates platform is.
This limited debates, limited candidates, limited rule...is why our country is so screwed. SO SICK OF THE ESTABLISHMENT CABAL!!!!
36 posted on
05/22/2015 3:17:54 PM PDT by
Lucky9teen
(Justice will not be served until those who r unaffected r as outraged as those who r. B Franklin)
To: SeekAndFind
Good but 10 still too many.
To: SeekAndFind
Nowhere in there is any indication that they will hold an actual debate. They can call it whatever they want, but they can’t change the fact that these things aren’t debates, and really serve little useful purpose to those trying to make a reasoned choice for the nomination.
38 posted on
05/22/2015 3:20:30 PM PDT by
jjsheridan5
(The next Ronald Reagan will not be a Republican, but rather a former Republican)
To: SeekAndFind
The machinery is in motion to get Jeb Booosh elected.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson