Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Maryland) MVA Drops Parallel Parking from Driver’s License Test
Montgomery County Media ^ | 5/19/2015 | Krista Brick

Posted on 05/20/2015 3:14:22 AM PDT by markomalley

If you listen closely you can almost hear a collective sigh of relief from 16 year olds across the state.

The reason – the Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration officially removed parallel parking as a required test element on the driver’s license test on a statewide basis starting today.

According to Buel Young, spokesperson for the MVA, the administration determined that completing a two-point turn and backing up are similar enough to parallel parking to eliminate the parking element from the test.

“The MVA consistently evaluates its assessments of both the knowledge and skills tests. In analyzing the skills test, it was determined that the currently used 2-point reverse turn, when combined with the on-road portions or the test, adequately assessed the individual’s ability to operate the vehicle,” Young told MYMCMedia Tuesday.

You can find out more about the MVA tests here.

Young said parallel parking is still taught in driving schools.

“We encourage everyone to know how to do it,” he said.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: driverslicense; maryland; mva; parallel; parallelparking; parking; test
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: grania

“Is it just me? The older, boxier cars with larger windows were much easier to maneuver.”

Absolutely. I drive a Jeep Wrangler. Drove a friends Chrysler 300 the other day and couldn’t believe how much less I could see.


21 posted on 05/20/2015 5:15:29 AM PDT by CrazyIvan (I lost my phased plasma rifle in a tragic hovercraft accident.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
When I was 16 (many many years ago) NC didn't require parallel parking, but did have the three point turn. I just couldn't seem to get it right. It didn't help that my Dad's car that I was using was a 1970 Buick LeSabre. Tight maneuvers in those big old BOATS were next impossible.
22 posted on 05/20/2015 5:22:21 AM PDT by fredhead (Join the Navy and see the world.....77% of which is covered in water.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

One more reason why Maryland MVA is full of stupid people. I’ve been driving for 38 years and have parallel parked more in the six years I’ve lived in the cesspool than the 32 years previous combined.

Marylanders are statistically the second worst drivers in the nation, yet these idiots are dumbing down the requirements.

Par for the course for MVA. They define stupid. It once took me four trips and over nine hours (over the course of 3-4 weeks) to get a simple set of license plates.


23 posted on 05/20/2015 5:51:43 AM PDT by cyclotic ( Check out traillifeusa.com. America's premier boys outdoor organization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

IMHO... the parallel parking requirements have become stupid in Maryland. They aren’t anything like I learned (and passed on the first test). The right signal has to stay on the entire time. If it goes off.. you fail. You can’t turn your head around but have to use the mirrors instead. Turn your head around and you are failed. For anyone who parallels frequently.. try the old Maryland’s rules the next time you try it. Don’t take your two hands off the wheel at any point, don’t turn your head around, use the mirrors only and manage all of this without the turn signal ever going off. This is what most students failed at.. even if the parallel was done perfectly.

I learned in MoCo years ago but tbh.. there was a lot less traffic and aggressive drivers then. Students now have to become almost citified/expert drivers in most of the counties. I would rather them train more driving.. the ICC, night driving, interstate, rush hour etc... to be prepared then parallel. Just my opinion....


24 posted on 05/20/2015 6:13:00 AM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: momtothree
Remember: maryland is THE Freak state. Escape while you can...there is no hope there.
25 posted on 05/20/2015 6:38:26 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

> a two-point turn and backing up are similar enough to parallel parking

Hahehehaha. Yeah right.


26 posted on 05/20/2015 7:31:41 AM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

You can get more cars in a given space, but it’s dangerous. You have to back out into traffic while your view is obstructed.


27 posted on 05/20/2015 7:37:31 AM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

I’ve never had a problem with them (angled or straight in). The key is backing out slowly and looking and not being distracted by radio, etc.. There is simply no reason for parallel spaces unless there just isn’t enough road right-of-way to accommodate them.


28 posted on 05/20/2015 7:40:17 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

There are some areas here that have nose-in parking. If I have to go there I park somewhere else and walk a block or two. You can not see oncoming traffic through a row of nose-in parked cars. It’s not only those backing out who are in danger, it those traveling down the road.


29 posted on 05/20/2015 8:00:04 AM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

We have them all up and down my little city’s main street. Never seen an accident.


30 posted on 05/20/2015 8:11:01 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Well our experiences and opinion differ.

What’s even more fun is watching the tourists deal with the suicide lane.


31 posted on 05/20/2015 8:33:57 AM PDT by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
I rarely have to parallel park and wasn't tested on it over 20 years ago (rural Michigan), but it's something that's good to know if you live/park in a city or dense suburbs.

It's a skill I need when I have to do work in the people's republic of Ann Arbor.

32 posted on 05/20/2015 8:37:23 AM PDT by Darren McCarty (We need a conservative electable candidate in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

‘67 buick lesabre. try whipping one of them around.


33 posted on 05/20/2015 8:41:21 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: manc

She has a lot of company out there on our roads...


34 posted on 05/20/2015 8:57:06 AM PDT by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
I think that parallel parking spaces are the most inefficient use of available road space out there. Unless you have absolutely no extra driving lane width available, angle-in parking is more efficient.

You are correct. My town has angle parking on most of the downtown streets. The streets are effectively 4 lanes wide, so there is still ample room in the street when the curbs are taken up with cars angle parked. You do get more cars parked per block with angle parking.

However, angle parking creates another problem When you angle park on the left side of the street, you can't see through the car to your left to determine if there's oncoming traffic before you pull out. If you angle park on the right side, it's almost as bad. You have to look through your own car, past the car on the right, to check for oncoming traffic.

Parallel parking is less efficient in use of curb space, but it's a lot easier for the driver to check for oncoming traffic from behind, when parallel parked.

35 posted on 05/20/2015 1:58:25 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney ( book, RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY, available from Amazon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson