Show me where there is any justification, from ANY source, on your claim on this thread the trespass was related to the speeding up to 100 mph.
They were related only by the calendar.
Perhaps you also saw, on the same Philly TV page, where it states:
The two incidents so far have not been connected.
Post 10. “So. A trespasser is the reason to speed up to 100 MPH. This is diversionist BS.” ( Granted, I should have added a question mark after MPH but I’d though you guys were smart enough to recognize it.)
Secondly, the Philly TV station related the connection by AMTREK’s mention. FYI, the cite for the OP IS part of the thread and should be viewed IMO.
Lastly, I DID post “The two incidents so far have not been connected” bit. Read my last post. Apparently you didn’t. Regardless, my whole point in uselessly arguing with you is that this story was MEANT to confuse the two. I don’t twist and contort things. You misinterpreted what I meant all along and you are too much of a contrarian to admit it.