Post 10. “So. A trespasser is the reason to speed up to 100 MPH. This is diversionist BS.” ( Granted, I should have added a question mark after MPH but I’d though you guys were smart enough to recognize it.)
Secondly, the Philly TV station related the connection by AMTREK’s mention. FYI, the cite for the OP IS part of the thread and should be viewed IMO.
Lastly, I DID post “The two incidents so far have not been connected” bit. Read my last post. Apparently you didn’t. Regardless, my whole point in uselessly arguing with you is that this story was MEANT to confuse the two. I don’t twist and contort things. You misinterpreted what I meant all along and you are too much of a contrarian to admit it.
I still don’t see how you thought one event was offered up as a justification for the other.
Do you think the report of the one event was supposed to pretend the major derailment in the same area, on the same day, never happened? Do you think because there was one major story they were not supposed to report the second?