Posted on 05/19/2015 8:47:14 AM PDT by VinL
He told ABC five years ago that he supported citizenship, leaving him with two options now. One: Stick to his guns and give conservatives another reason to treat Christie as a curse word. Two: Follow Scott Walkers lead by pleading ignorance in his earlier views and claiming that hes since seen the light. Actual quote from Christie: I have now learned some of the ramifications for all of these things. What those things might be isnt clear, but itd be impolite after such an earnest pander to badger the poor guy for details. Hes trying, Republicans. A for effort?
This clip is interesting less because of Christies reasoning which Kelly, sensing the pander, doesnt bother asking about and he doesnt offer than what it signals about his campaign strategy. The night he was reelected governor, people expected Christie to be the establishment hero in the 2016 race, the one guy who might be able to go a bit further left on issues like immigration than the rest of the field because hed have so much donor-class money propping him up. Two years later, after Bridgegate and Jeb Bushs entry into the race, hes a guy without a niche. Hes not going to out-establishment Jeb so pandering to centrists now on illegals will earn him nothing except more enmity from the right. (Bushs own feelings about a path to citizenship have been nuanced to the point of opacity, which Im sure is just how he likes it.) Meanwhile, hes burned way, way too many bridges with grassroots conservatives to hope theyll fill the vacuum of his lost support in the center. The obvious solution is to try to keep pace with Walker and Marco Rubio by competing for center-righties who might find Jeb a bit too squishy and conservatives like Ted Cruz a bit too ideological. I think his speech a few weeks ago about entitlement reform was a bid to show center-righties that he could be even bolder on fiscal reform than Walker was when he overhauled PEU collective bargaining in Wisconsin. That was a gamble, calculating that somewhat conservative voters would be more impressed by his show of leadership than alienated by the thought of tweaking Social Security and Medicare, but he needed to try something to grab their attention. Now hes signaling to them that he might be a good fit for them on immigration too, not quite the notorious sellout that Rubio was when he joined the Gang of Eight but also not necessarily a guy who may try to curb legal immigration, as Walkers recently hinted at. (Ironically, Christies apparent legalization-without-citizenship position also happens to be the position of alleged right-wing nutjob Cruz.) If he can remain kinda sorta politically acceptable to center-righties through the summer, then hell show up at the debates hoping to leapfrog Walker and Rubio through sheer force of personality and charisma. Its a longshot but thats what hes got.
I can only assume, though, that this means Christies written off whatever claim he once had to having special appeal to Latino voters. His reelection campaign in New Jersey worked hard to run up the score with that group in hopes that itd be a credential for his eventual presidential run. He ended up with 51 percent of the Latino vote in his landslide victory, a 19-point improvement over 2009. Now that Bush is in the race, though, and Rubio seems a legit threat to become the first Latino major-party nominee, maybe Christie figures that his path with Latinos is sufficiently blocked that he might as well flip on citizenship and see if that gets him anything among center-right voters generally. Exit question: What will his response be when Democrats inevitably accuse him of wanting second-class status for illegals by barring them from citizenship? Kind of surprised Kelly didnt press him on that.
I know that you believe that you understood what you think I said, but
I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
Christie should stay in New Jersey.
Nobody believes him, do they?
Too late you worthless, illegal-alien loving, anti-American RINO! Just like Rubio, you made it perfectly clear that you care more about illegal aliens than you do AMERICAN CITIZENS, and the rule of law and now, when your campaign is in the toilet you want to miraculously change your stated position in order to try and trick us into voting for you? Do you take us for fools? Well, we aren’t and we remember exactly what you ORIGINALLY said and STILL believe concerning this issue; too bad, so sad, go eat a doughnut.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.