Betcha he surrounds himself with em
We’ve had to suffer him for many long years.
He helped put in the MD gun ban 2 years ago.
Uggghh!
Taxpayers footed the bills for the entire buck-sucking Tsarnaev's for a long, l-o-n-g time. When these immigrants get to the US they claim "asylum" b/c that triggers endless monthly Social Security checks ......that's just for starters.
=================================================
BACKSTORY Immediately after the Boston bombing, then-Democrat Mass Gov Deval Patrick ordered Massachusetts govt agencies to conceal welfare documents from taxpayers. But sources who saw 500 pages of welfare documents (requested by a state legislator) told News Center 5 that the entire Chechnyan immigrant Tsarnaev family collected upwards of $100,00 tax dollars free and clear. MA taxpayers financed the killing and maiming of their own friends and neighbors.
================================================
MASSACHUSETTS TAXPAYERS WERE UNKNOWINGLY FORCED TO FINANCE THE TSARNEV BROTHERS' DIRTY DEEDS BIGTIME ---After the Boston bombing, Massachusetts Democrat Gov Deval Patrick refused to divulge info WRT massive public assistance to the bomber killers/Chechen immigrants.
But state welfare officials were forced to come clean b/c the info is available to lawmakers. State Rep David Linsky called on the Mass Dept of Transitional Assistance to provide the info..... issuing an ultimatum, giving them 24 hours to provide the info.
The Boston Herald published the state's response: 'My office is working to fully comply with your request,' DTA interim commissioner Stacey Monahan wrote, saying they were only providing a summary 'given the great interest in this matter.'
Chechen immigrants--the bombers' parents----were eligible as legal, non-citizen residents who claimed "asylum" status and met the eligibility criteria for DTA, DTA interim commissioner Stacey Monahan said in a letter to David Linsky, Chairman of the Mass House Post Audit and Oversight Committee.
Multiple state agencies, on orders from Democrat Gov Patrick, refused to comment on the bomber brothers' welfare haul.
<><> WRT Tamerlan receiving UI benefits, Labor dept spokesman Kevin Franck refused to comment....
<><> Univ of Mass-- Dartmouth spokesman Robert Connolly refused to comment on the financial aid app of 19 -year-old soph Dzhokhar. 'It is our position - and I believe the accepted position in higher education - that student records including academic records and financial records (including financial aid) cannot under federal law be released without a student’s consent.'
<><> The FCC would not discuss whether the suspected bombers had govt-paid Obamaphones.
<><> Cambridge housing officials would not comment on if the brothers had Section 8 rental subsidy offered by the HUD to low income households.
<><> Chechen immigrants--the bombers' parents--were legal, non-citizen residents who claimed "asylum" status and met the eligibility criteria for endless SS checks.
<><> In sum, while planning the bombing, the Chechneyan immigrants received every conceivable tax-paid public benefit available out there.
Wizard of Id: Criminal with noose on neck on gallows, “The death penalty is not a deterrent!” The King, “ I’ll believe that when I see you again.”
Before he leaves us, his organs need to be harvested.
These same knotheads are the ones that cheer Obama blasting a Muzzie leader to hell with a drone and calling him a brilliant brave CiC. They live in a world of political expediency, not reality.
It most definitely effective as punishment, however.
L
As others here have said: It will work for him.
Then cut the costs and fix the appeals process. It’s liberals who make the system ineffective and then condemn the system for being ineffective.
It’s punishment, not a deterrent, O’Moron.
“The death penalty is ineffective as a deterrent....”
Only because it isn’t applied quickly enough. Give them 1 year for appeals and if they don’t win, carry out the sentence.
When O’Malley dies, he will no longer be able to tax and spend. See how well “deterrence” works?
So why do muslims kill people?
I agree that the appeals process is far too extended. But the blame for this is not the thing-in-itself, the death penalty, but lies entirely at the feet of abusive federal judges who personally disdain the death penalty, so have erected considerable petty obstacles to it being carried out.
Since congress determines the behavior of the judiciary inferior to the Supreme Court, just two people could readily change this: the respective chairmen of the senate and house judiciary committees.
They could do so by making some common sense changes to federal procedure that would in *no way* make the appeals process less fair, but would reduce the time wasted in the process by half or more. For example:
1) Declare the states to be “competent authorities” in carrying out death sentences. This would mean no more nit picking by judges over the *means* of execution. In effect it would declare that “normal means” of execution, such as lethal injection, electrocution, the gas chamber, the firing squad, even hanging, are excepted from arguments that they are cruel or unusual.
2) Move all death penalty appeals to the front of the federal docket, so they are first heard within, say, one month after being accepted for appeal, not have to wait for years behind dozens of other cases.
3) Limit continuances during the appeals process to one month each for the defense, prosecution, and at the discretion of the judge. Added to the previous change, this would mean a maximum of four to six months spent in an appeal, assuming a lot of evidence needs to be presented.
4) Create a bias against federal judges being able to overturn death sentences, or to issuing instructions to lower courts to do so. Only in cases where there is exculpatory evidence, gross impropriety at the trial level, or gross constitutional violation should they be able to do so. In short, either the evidence proves them *innocent*, or officers of the court will be tried for criminal behavior, or that the unconstitutionality of the execution makes its unconscionable.
Instead, if they support the appeal, the typical instruction is for the case to be returned to the trial court for reconsideration. If the trial court again finds for the death penalty, then the appeal on that argument is set aside.
5) Significant changes need to be made to expedite the federal death penalty.
so does that mean he thinks life imprisonment is a deterrent? Drawing and quartering would probably be a deterrent to at least some of them. But even that might not deter all of them particularly islamic fanatics. then what? what about justice for the families that were savaged?
But it is just. True justice is first making a rational moral judgment and then acting to deliver what is rationally deserved in accordance with that judgment.
I don’t care at all if it deters anyone from anything.
The purpose of the death penalty is to kill the damned bastard.
That’s it.
If Tsarnev, and Morsi, and similar types sit in prison awaiting execution of their sentence, the ISIS types will capture innocents. The West will then negotiate the release of innocents for terrorists. The terrorists will win the propaganda war. the West will look like impotent jerks.
Remember Bergdahl? You ain’t seen nuttin yet.
*