Posted on 05/16/2015 4:50:30 AM PDT by HomerBohn
This is a massive betrayal of Israel and all free people, and an endorsement of the genocidal “Palestinian” jihad against the Jews. A “State of Palestine” will no more bring peace than did the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza: just as with Gaza, a “State of Palestine” will just become another jihad base.
The Vatican has every reason to know that. The “Palestinians” on their official media outlets make no secret of their goal of wiping out Israel and killing Jews wholesale. Now the Vatican has signed on to that.
—The Vatican said it would soon sign its first treaty with the “State of Palestine,” lending legal weight to a recognition it has extended for more than two years and drawing swift criticism from Israel. The Holy See has had diplomatic relations with the Palestinians since 1994, and has referred to the “State of Palestine” in official documents since the United Nations admitted a Palestinian nonmember observer state in 2012.
The agreement announced Wednesday, which a joint Vatican-Palestinian statement said will be signed in the near future, is the result of talks that began in 2000. It comes four days before Pope Francis canonizes two Palestinian saints in St. Peter’s Square. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas is expected to attend the ceremony.
The treaty’s text wasn’t released, but Msgr. Antoine Camilleri, the Holy See’s chief negotiator with the Palestinians, told the Vatican-run newspaper the accord covers the activities and legal status of the Catholic Church in the Palestinian Territories. A “very elaborate and detailed” section deals with “religious freedom and freedom of conscience,” Msgr. Camilleri said. Other sections deal with property and tax questions, as well as the scope of Catholic media and charitable activities.
Msgr. Camilleri voiced hope other Muslim-majority countries would follow the Palestinian example of recognizing the religious freedom of Christians and other minorities. He said he also hoped the deal would help, “if only in an indirect way,” to promote the recognition of Palestinian statehood and the realization of a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Israel decried the recognition. “Israel was disappointed to hear of the Holy See’s decision to agree to the final version of the agreement with the Palestinians,” said Israel’s foreign ministry. “This does not promote the peace process and a Palestinian return to the negotiations.
Israel will study the agreement and consider its next steps accordingly.” In Washington, Obama administration officials were reserved in their reaction to the Vatican move, refraining from offering any criticism or expressing disappointment. Instead, State Department spokesman Jeff Rathke reiterated the U.S. position – that Palestinian statehood must result from negotiations with Israel, and not be imposed by outside nations or international institutions.
Israel has been on the defensive diplomatically, as the Palestinians push state recognition in international organizations. Israeli diplomats and experts expect international pressure on the country to rise in response to concerns Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s new conservative government won’t promote a two-state solution. His coalition partner Jewish Home calls for the annexation of 60% of the West Bank.
The U.S. generally defends Israel from outside pressure. But that stance has been shifting in recent months. During the height of friction between the U.S. and Israeli governments over Mr. Netanyahu’s March address to the U.S. Congress, the White House signaled a possible change, saying it might not reject U.N. demands for a settlement of differences between the two sides.
Palestinian officials said the pending Vatican agreement was another example of solidifying international support for recognizing that the West Bank, the Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem constitute a sovereign state under occupation by Israel, territories Israel considers disputed.
“It’s recognition that Palestinians are acting on their commitment to the two-state solution, while Israel is deliberately destroying it,’’ said Hanan Ashrawi, a senior official in the Palestine Liberation Organization. “We look at the Vatican recognition as having more than just diplomatic significance. It also has symbolic and moral significance.’’
Eggs Ackley, and that’s why Jacob had to trick his father when it came time for the blessings ...
“—Israel will study the agreement and consider its next steps accordingly—
The only studying they need to do is whether to strike during the day or night.
And btw, this Catholic stands with Israel all the way. Jesus is our high priest, not a man.”
Bwahahahahahaha! to your first comment.
AMEN to your second comment.
This Pope has made Abbas a Saint for arranging the
murder of Jews in Munich, and probably more since.
He didn't HAVE to do anything, he did it because neither he nor his mother fully believed God would fulfill His promise.
The context is Jacob had to trick his father in order to receive the blessing usually reserved for the oldest son. Had Jacob not joined his mother’s conspiracy and accomplished the subterfuge I am sure God had a way to fulfill His Promise in Jacob, the twister. When God ironed the twist out, He renamed him Isra el.
Isn’t it interesting how many examples God has given us of
Him promising, then men and women failing to believe the Promise and the consequences? And look at the ones who DO believe God’s Promises ... Rahab comes to mind, and Ruth, and Esther, and Mary, and Daniel, and Abraham, and Saul of Tarsus, and Cornelius, and ... well, you get the gist.
Even more interesting in hindsight is speculating on the fewer problems succeeding generations would have had to deal with had the shortage of faith not occurred.
The Jews are our older brothers. Read the parable of the prodigal son.
I don’t understand the benefit of a church signing a treaty. Are they going to agree not to invade each other? If that’s the case I wouldn’t trust the muslims.
This pope is a piece of work. If he is truly God’s representative we are in trouble.
Explain.
Now I understand what you mean about Israel being our older brothers. I was confused because I first thought you meant Israel,(Jacob) was the oldest brother.
I dunno. They keep barfing up some dandies with each on worse than the predecessor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.