[MrB]

“Kill the Gays”?
Is he Muslim?

I guess not. If he were, he’d get a pass.

[Boogieman]

“the author of a bill proposing murdering California’s gays”

I hate to be a nitpicker, but it’s not “murder” if you pass a law to authorize it.

[DoughtyOne]

I don’t know how she gets an extension to June 25th. The law states when the deadline is, and it’s her fault for not addressing this before now.

She’s obviously between a rock and a hard place, but she shouldn’t be able to ignore the law and then get protection from the court.

[W.]

Seems like he's just using the law in the same manner the gays and muzzies do to get force their will upon us. What's fair for the fags and the rags is fair game for all, or isn't this America anymore?

[DiogenesLamp]

In a bizarre legal twist in a jaw-droppingly hateful proposal that calls into question the entire California ballot initiative process, the author of a bill proposing murdering California’s gays may ask a court to place his proposal on the ballot without gathering a single signature other than his own.

A quibble. If it's legal then it's not murder. :)

[kingu]

The normal goal of liberals, to limit freedoms under the guise of ‘helping us.’ This guy’s goal was to tank the initiative process and remove it from the hands of the people and put it back in the hands of the nearly permanent liberal legislature.

[C. Edmund Wright]

I smell a gaystapo sting operation here.....

[truth_seeker]

The guy is an Orange County lawyer. Huntington Beach and/or Costa Mesa.

[JJ_Folderol]

Suppose it gets on the ballot and passes with an 80-20 majority demonstrating that what people say aloud in public is different from what they really think?

Thought provoking... and hilarious ironic!

[Suz in AZ]

There was an order for the extermination of Mormons in Missouri from the mid 1800’s until the 1980’s when it was repealed

[yefragetuwrabrumuy]

You have to wonder about the hysterics if it actually got on the ballot. A surprising number of people might vote for it as the only means available to them to protest out of control federal judges and the gay agenda being forced on the public.

And they could do so knowing that the law is unconstitutional on its face. So it is just a means by which perhaps millions of people could finally get their say, and not get shouted down or threatened in the process.

So the bottom line would be a very loud signal to the government to quit bowing and scraping before the homosexuals.

[Leep]

Waskally wabbit: What season is it?

[ivyleaguebrat]

“calls into question the entire California ballot initiative process”

That is it’s actual purpose, to discredit the concept of ballot initiatives and referenda (because “some things shouldn’t be up for a vote”).