Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/05/2015 4:06:54 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: Kaslin

Of course they will.


2 posted on 05/05/2015 4:08:06 PM PDT by GeronL (Clearly Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

3 posted on 05/05/2015 4:08:50 PM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Tar, feathers, rails


4 posted on 05/05/2015 4:09:38 PM PDT by Politically Correct (A member of the rabble in good standing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

No matter what they say, marriage will still be between a man and a woman. Everything else is only an imitation.

Same as if the SCOTUS declared the tail of a dog to be a leg. It is still a tail.


5 posted on 05/05/2015 4:10:21 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Some times you need more than six shots. Much more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

It’s inevitable...our civil society is collapsing.


6 posted on 05/05/2015 4:10:51 PM PDT by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Congress' Article III powers over Scotus ended in 1913.

The 17A opened the floodgate to anti-10A lawyers and marxists to the federal bench.

What's next? Will Scotus toss the law of gravity?

But hey, just keep voting.

9 posted on 05/05/2015 4:16:43 PM PDT by Jacquerie (To shun Article V is to embrace tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

We have to recall that the black-robed justices prepared the ground for the first Civil War with its Dred Scott decision. I’m not saying that recognizing gay marriage will cause a second civil war, but it would continue the long line of transgressions by the USSC that have robbed us of our God-given freedom, heritage and customs.

It needs to be made clear that these black robes will be made accountable for their decisions. It’s time to start talking about an American Nuremberg trial.


18 posted on 05/05/2015 4:30:57 PM PDT by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
What if SCOTUS Rules in Favor of Gay Marriage?

What do you mean "if"?

21 posted on 05/05/2015 4:38:08 PM PDT by Veggie Todd (The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Paging ValJar’s father. Your presence is required for a Stoning/Honor Killing at dawn.


23 posted on 05/05/2015 4:40:01 PM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

If they do, you would not want to be in their shoes.


24 posted on 05/05/2015 4:40:39 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
B T T T ! ! ! ©

25 posted on 05/05/2015 4:42:12 PM PDT by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FR. Donate Monthly or Join Club 300! God bless you all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
"The arc of the moral universe," said Jarrett, "bent a little faster than even we thought it would."

Being a good Muslim, Valerie of course means "the moral universe" as is defined by Islamic teachings.

Which, of course, do not include allowing homosexuals to live.

So, for all the gays and lesbians listening in, why, exactly, do you think Valerie is so happy about the progress of what you call "gay rights"?

One way or the other, you'll be tested on your answer.

28 posted on 05/05/2015 5:16:28 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Constitutional Amendment? Would take years.


30 posted on 05/05/2015 5:41:02 PM PDT by upchuck (The current Federal Governent is what the Founding Fathers tried to prevent. WAKE UP!! Amendment V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
"The arc of the moral universe," said Jarrett, "bent a little faster than even we thought it would."

What would this slumlord-racist know about morals, other than rotten ones?

31 posted on 05/05/2015 5:54:28 PM PDT by bkopto (Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

There won’t be any ‘what if’ about it...They are now spending their time trying to figure out how to justify their decision to the American people...


32 posted on 05/05/2015 6:01:45 PM PDT by Iscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

If the Supremes rule in favor of gay “marriage”, that will mean the same thing as their ruling in favor of abortion. States will have to tolerate it, but it will be no more moral than it is now. Such a ruling will also stop all debate cold, and no progress toward a real solution will be made ever again. I suspect the few sensible liberals in the world don’t want that. Sadly, none of the Court liberals have even a shred of common sense.


33 posted on 05/05/2015 6:04:03 PM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This is Caesar’s tribunal, composed of Caesar’s minions, who will no doubt do Caesar’s bidding. Take away the pomp, the circumstance, and the theatrics and you have 9 political hacks in black muumuus. They don’t represent me, and do not have anything even resembling moral authority.


34 posted on 05/05/2015 6:07:26 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Jeb! 2016. Dynastic rule for a new millenia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
I'm waiting for the first queer marriage at a mosque.


39 posted on 05/05/2015 6:19:12 PM PDT by RightGeek (FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I know there is a contingent of well-known pastors who have already signed a petition and letter, stating that regardless of the outcome of their decision, their allegiance is to God’s Word. If the SCOTUS removes traditional marriage, they will NOT perform same-sex marriages under any circumstances, as to do so would be blasphemous and against God’s laws. I would hope that MANY others would join them, if push comes to shove.


40 posted on 05/05/2015 6:24:07 PM PDT by Shery (Pray for righteousness to be restored and for the peace of Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

When 2 percent of the population slaps you in the face you leave.I will never vote again.


41 posted on 05/05/2015 6:39:28 PM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson