It all fits together, doesn't it?
1 posted on
05/04/2015 9:57:31 AM PDT by
Salman
To: Salman
islam is the religion of something...
evil.
2 posted on
05/04/2015 9:58:42 AM PDT by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: Salman
I think its time for another contest!!
3 posted on
05/04/2015 9:59:20 AM PDT by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: Salman
two down, hundreds of thousands to go. what a cool officer with a pistol to kill this garbage. YES your religion is based on worshipping a moon god and your founder is a child rapist pos!!!
4 posted on
05/04/2015 9:59:39 AM PDT by
dp0622
(Franky Five Angels: "Look, let's get 'em all -- let's get 'em all now, while we got the muscle.")
To: Salman; All
Uuuuuummmmmmm, obamalamadingdong isn’t going to like this “a jihadist terrorism suspect.”
Work place violence people, get the jargon correct or be subject to dear leaders “re-education.”
5 posted on
05/04/2015 10:01:08 AM PDT by
areukiddingme1
(areukiddingme1 is a synonym for a Retired U.S. Navy Chief Petty Officer and tired of liberal BS.))
To: Salman
7 posted on
05/04/2015 10:01:49 AM PDT by
nuconvert
( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
To: Salman
Picture of the perp from another story
8 posted on
05/04/2015 10:01:52 AM PDT by
Menehune56
("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
To: Salman
how did they lose the gun battle with assault weapons against a pistol!! lol.
Dirty Harry was there!!!
10 posted on
05/04/2015 10:04:12 AM PDT by
dp0622
(Franky Five Angels: "Look, let's get 'em all -- let's get 'em all now, while we got the muscle.")
To: Salman
Wonder what’s taking so long to identify the second shooter?
11 posted on
05/04/2015 10:04:34 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
To: Salman
NY Slimes has called the event “anti-Islam” in their headline, thus rationalizing the terrorists’ response. I hate to say it, but I am so furious that I wouldn’t lose much sleep if some nut went in THEIR offices and opened fire for the tons of ink they spilled against Christianity, so that some newspaper would put in THEIR headline: nutcase opens fire in the offices of the Anti-Christian NY Times!
Of course this will never happen, nor would I want it to happen as us Christians do not condone murder, even when we get attacked, or get “offended”.
To: Salman
Love the NYTimes headline...
Attack at Texas “Anti-Islam Event”.
This was not an anti-Islam event. It was a “Free-Speech Event”.
So would Christianity across the globe be considered Anti-Islam by the NYTimes?
Perhaps there is some justification for the brutal murders of thousands of Christians....because they are Anti-Islamic?
Wow! Just plain damn Wow!
To: Salman
Anti-Islam event?
I knew from that headline that it must be a scum-bag, laying, POS newspaper like the NYT!!
17 posted on
05/04/2015 10:06:19 AM PDT by
blam
(Jeff Sessions For President)
To: Salman
The comments at the NYSlimes come down solidly against Pamela Geller and supportive of those poor taunted (but luckily for us, dead) jihadis.
Effing Liberals.
19 posted on
05/04/2015 10:08:15 AM PDT by
RoosterRedux
(WSC: The truth is incontrovertible; malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end...)
To: Salman
Let's go ahead and snip one more from the article. In spite of itself, ...
Ms. Geller described Sunday’s event as pro-free speech, and said that Muslims had become a “special class” that Americans were no longer allowed to offend.
“The media is self-enforcing a Shariah,” she said, referring to Islamic law. “Under the Shariah you cannot criticize or offend Islam.”
23 posted on
05/04/2015 10:10:16 AM PDT by
don-o
(He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
To: Salman
Nope, nothing to see here. I didn’t click on the link, did NYT actually say ‘anti-islam event’?
Makes you wonder how many TRUE sleeper cells are here inside and learning from these wannabe amateurs.
25 posted on
05/04/2015 10:13:16 AM PDT by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: Salman
27 posted on
05/04/2015 10:15:41 AM PDT by
dragnet2
(Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
To: Salman
So the NYT thinks that cartoons are “anti-islam.” And not freedom of speech. You’d think journalists would get it, but it’s been a long time since the NYT was anything but a public relations outlet.
30 posted on
05/04/2015 10:17:27 AM PDT by
Veto!
(Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
To: Salman
What? The second guy (and likely wife of the first - they were mates afterall) is the 12th Imam or something?
39 posted on
05/04/2015 10:34:07 AM PDT by
Paladin2
To: Salman
43 posted on
05/04/2015 11:01:44 AM PDT by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not A Matter of Opinion)
To: Salman
the Prophet Muhammad The New York Times, CNN, the media really does honor the guy as "the Prophet Muhammad".
45 posted on
05/04/2015 11:28:45 AM PDT by
ansel12
(LEGAL immigrants, 30 million 1980-2012, continues to remake the nation's electorate for democrats)
To: Salman
Official Identifies One Suspect in Attack at Texas Anti-Islam Event Notice how they tag it as a "Anti-Islam" event rather than a freedom of speech event? This is how they distort the news.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
