Posted on 05/04/2015 6:56:04 AM PDT by Red Badger
Credit: NASA Langley/David C. Bowman
A team at NASA's Langley Research Center is developing a concept of a battery-powered plane that has 10 engines and can take off like a helicopter and fly efficiently like an aircraft. The prototype, called Greased Lightning or GL-10, is currently in the design and testing phase. The initial thought was to develop a 20-foot wingspan (6.1 meters) aircraft powered by hybrid diesel/electric engines, but the team started with smaller versions for testing, built by rapid prototyping.
Imagine a battery-powered plane that has 10 engines and can take off like a helicopter and fly efficiently like an aircraft. That is a concept being developed by NASA researchers called Greased Lightning or GL-10.
The team, at NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia, is looking at the idea initially as a potential unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). "We have a couple of options that this concept could be good for," said Bill Fredericks, aerospace engineer. "It could be used for small package delivery or vertical take off and landing, long endurance surveillance for agriculture, mapping and other applications. A scaled up versionmuch larger than what we are testing nowwould make also a great one to four person size personal air vehicle.""
The GL-10 is currently in the design and testing phase. The initial thought was to develop a 20-foot wingspan (6.1 meters) aircraft powered by hybrid diesel/electric engines, but the team started with smaller versions for testing, built by rapid prototyping.
"We built 12 prototypes, starting with simple five-pound (2.3 kilograms) foam models and then 25-pound (11.3 kilograms), highly modified fiberglass hobby airplane kits all leading up to the 55-pound (24.9 kilograms), high quality, carbon fiber GL-10 built in our model shop by expert technicians, " said aerospace engineer David North.
"Each prototype helped us answer technical questions while keeping costs down. We did lose some of the early prototypes to 'hard landings' as we learned how to configure the flight control system. But we discovered something from each loss and were able to keep moving forward."
During a recent spring day the engineers took the GL-10 to test its wings at a military base about two hours away from NASA Langley. The remotely piloted plane has a 10-foot wingspan (3.05 meters), eight electric motors on the wings, two electric motors on the tail and weighs a maximum of 62 pounds (28.1 kilograms) at take off.
It had already passed hover testsflying like a helicopterwith flying colors. But now was the big hurdlethe transition from vertical to forward "wing-borne" flight. As engineers who have designed full-scale vertical take off and landing tiltrotors such as the V-22 Osprey will tell youthat is no easy task because of the challenging flight aerodynamics.
"During the flight tests we successfully transitioned from hover to wing-borne flight like a conventional airplane then back to hover again. So far we have done this on five flights," said Fredericks. "We were ecstatic. Now we're working on our second goalto demonstrate that this concept is four times more aerodynamically efficient in cruise than a helicopter."
Zack Johns is the GL-10's primary pilot. He says flying the ten-engine aircraft has its ups and downs, but it really flies more like a three-engine plane from a control perspective.
"All four engines on the left wing are given the same command," said Johns. "The four engines on the right wing also work in concert. Then the two on the tail receive the same command."
One other advantage to the GL-10 besides its versatile vertical take off and landing ability is its noise or lack of it. "It's pretty quiet," said Fredericks. "The current prototype is quieter than a neighbor mowing the law with a gas-powered motor."
The next step in the GL-10 test program is to try to confirm its aerodynamic efficiency, but first is a stop at the Association for Unmanned Vehicles Systems International 2015 conference in Atlanta May 4-7. The GL-10 will be the centerpiece of an exhibit showcasing some of NASA Langley's UAV research.
Part of that UAV research is for NASA Aeronautics' Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration in the National Airspace System Project, led out of the Armstrong Flight Research Center in Edwards, California. Engineers from Armstrong will highlight project accomplishments and upcoming work in a booth in Atlanta. The goal of the project is to provide research results to reduce the technical barriers associated with integrating unmanned aerial vehicles into the skies.
Researchers from the Wallops Flight Facility in Wallops Island, Virginia will also be at the conference, highlighting unmanned aircraft for use in science missions. "Remotely piloted aircraft are enhancing NASA science investigations and serve as a platform to expand technology development for aircraft, cubesats and other platforms," said Wallops Director's Office official Mike Hitch.
To me, it looks like a submarine with wings.
Picture was from the testing regime before free-flight. I chose it as it showed the aft props better than the ones in the first picture.
A battery that can store enough energy for a useful flight range and payload would be astounding.
Currently ,far more energy is released in usable form by combustion of a pound of liquid hydrocarbons in an engine versus the usable energy delivered by a pound of storage battery.
According to the article, their goal is a diesel-electric hybrid system.
Wing is swept, so when you stand it up on edge for hovering the center of lift would move forward.
If they work the bugs out, I suppose you'll see these hovering over every demonstration taking pictures or dispensing tear gas...
Doesn't one of those "A"s stand for Aeronautics or Aerospace or similar?
groan.
I wonder if they are wired in series or parallel, or series-parallel?.................
That's not a crane, it's the power cord, silly................
In that picture, it is. But, if you follow the link to the article, you'll find an video showing:
This is the third prototype, larger than the first two. The important part is that it is scalable: just add more engines to generate more lift.
There are a lot of practical uses for this, especially because it can transition to horizontal flight and use much less power per mile. Of course, it will need a new control system.
The cool part is that it demonstrates the concept is much easier to accomplish, without all the complex mechanicals required for the V-22 Osprey.
It was completely controlled with differential thrust: left/right sides control roll, front/back control pitch.
That's also how quadcopters work.
Something trivially easy to do in small scale (see the myriad of RC controlled quad copters) but is almost impossible with a full scale aircraft because of the required thrust and throttle response. Full scale helicopters use pitch control because it reacts faster than throttle control.
The thing that killed the XC-147 was the wing flex being incompatible with the cross shaft that connects all four engines together. The cross shaft is vitally important for an engine out situation.
Can a diesel-electric hybrid total weight be less than IC or jets? I don’t see how.
Any day NASA will announce the discovery of balloons powered by the hot air from Al Gore ,obama, and all the other champions of failed or narrow niche technologies.Technologies that just happen to make them rich through government subsidies are the politicians and advocates favorites!
I don't know.
I do "know", from talking to friends who are GA pilots, that there's some work going on in developing piston aircraft that used diesel, rather than spark ignition engines. This is driven by a desire to run them on JET-A, rather than AVGAS.
The diesel-electric setup would allow separating the diesel engine from the propeller nacelles ... possibly a good thing on a tiltrotor aircraft.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.