Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VinL

So...are the justices going to punt?


4 posted on 04/28/2015 8:45:49 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fatnotlazy

If they would at least punt it back to the states, that would be something.


17 posted on 04/28/2015 8:52:37 AM PDT by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: fatnotlazy

Ginsburg did a sham homosexual marriage a couple of weeks ago and she won’t recuse herself.
Why the hell is this even allowed?


32 posted on 04/28/2015 9:05:34 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: fatnotlazy
So...are the justices going to punt?

Kennedy might vote that States can deny gay marriage, but that the Full Faith and Credit Clause (Article IV, Section 1) that States must recognize other States' gay marriages. That way, each side gets a little something. Kennedy did something like this in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), which dealt with abortion.

124 posted on 04/28/2015 4:33:58 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson