|
 |
Posted on 04/27/2015 12:43:46 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
LAS VEGAS — Sen. Ted Cruz has been gunning to abolish the Internal Revenue Service since coming to Washington two years ago.
To critics of the Texas Republican in Democratic and GOP circles, it sounds like bluster. The fiery rhetoric garners hearty applause from conservative audiences, particularly since revelations in 2013 that the IRS targeted Tea Party groups for extra scrutiny. But some federal agency is going to have to collect taxes, so Cruz's vow to shutter the IRS smacks of a politically motivated campaign promise rather than serious policy — at least to some.
In an interview with the Washington Examiner on Friday, the 2016 presidential candidate began to put some meat on the bones. Cruz, 44, explained how "abolishing the IRS" fits into his proposal, still being crafted by his team of economic advisors, for wholesale tax reform. This proposal, which Cruz plans to unveil later this year, is a key plank in his domestic agenda for economic growth that he would pursue as president.
"When it comes to jobs and growth and opportunity, the two most effective levers that the federal government has to facilitate small businesses creating new jobs, are tax reform and regulatory reform," Cruz said late last week, during a 20-minute discussion while on a brief swing through Las Vegas. "I am campaigning on a flat tax that would allow every American to fill out his or her taxes on a post card that allow us to abolish the IRS."
Cruz said he envisions shifting the tracking and collection of federal taxes to "some much smaller division" of the Treasury Department. The senator said that replacing the current, complex tax code with a simple flat tax would eliminate most of the work the IRS needs to do, making the agency obsolete and "irrelevant."
In its purest form, a "flat tax" treats all taxpayers equally. Income is taxed at the same rate regardless of earnings or wealth, while allowing for no tax deductions or exemptions. But Cruz said his flat tax proposal might allow some deductions, possibly for popular write-offs like for charitable donations and mortgage interest charged on a primary residence, paid annually by homeowners.
"We will roll it out with precise details in the coming weeks or months," he said. "There are trade-offs to be had and we're right now internally having those debates, in terms of whether you have a couple of deductions or exemptions or not, at what rate the flat rate is set, what level of standard deductions and so those trade-offs we're currently debating."
Cruz said the theme of his campaign rests on restoring Americans' optimism for the future, as defined by three elements: "No. 1, bringing back jobs and growth and opportunity; No. 2., defending our constitutional liberties and No. 3, restoring America's leadership in the world."
The Texan emphasized that regulatory reform was just as important as tax reform in satisfying his top goal of igniting the economy and fueling job growth. Unlike his plans for tax reform, which would presumably require congressional sign-off, Cruz said he could pursue a significant amount of regulatory reform through his executive authority, and that he would do so aggressively during his first 100 days as president.
Cruz said that Washington has implemented reams of regulatory rules that executive branch bureaucrats wrote on their own, outside of the legislative process and without the approval of Congress. Accordingly, the senator, who has at times criticized President Obama for overstepping his executive authority, said that he would use his executive authority to roll many of these regulations back.
"One major area of unilateral steps concerns regulatory reform, the second half of job growth," Cruz said, explaining his views on where it's appropriate for a president to govern by executive action.
"There are a great many things that can be implemented unilaterally in the executive," he said. "The president, under Article II of Constitution, is charged with executing the laws. Many of the most burdensome rules coming from Washington come from the executive branch from unaccountable, unelected bureaucrats and if I'm elected president, one of the very top priorities is going to be to rein back those regulations, those executive orders, those rules from Washington that are burdening small businesses and killing jobs."
|
|
Ted Cruz Ping! Rothschild had his mafia thugs kill the last president that tried that.
Close the ‘loophole’ that allows the regulatory agencies to bypass congress!
This election is literally Ted Cruz against the world.
The most corrupt evil centers of power on earth have their hands in America’s pockets now.
Cruz!
I can shoot all kinds of holes in the Flat Tax arguments.
But this is Ted Cruz, and I’ll take him along with his flat tax over anything else.
But ....
He will catch a whiff of HR 25 for sure.
In fact, has has already said he supports HR 25.
True. Customs collects duties. But other then that, all we need is a couple of guys in an office who send 50 bills out: Let the States collect their dues for keeping the FedGov operating, and send them in annually.
Other then that, no need for a giant bureaucracy.
That's what the Founders planned. They had it right.
I would prefer a national retail sales tax
(not necessarily the “fairtax” and it’s complicated “prebates”).
But a flat tax would just be an adjustment to the existing tax code,
and could be implemented by an act of congress, whereas
a national retail sales tax would require a constitutional amendment.
“Rothschild had his mafia thugs kill the last president that tried that.”
Hmmm.... I don’t know why but something about a goose popped into my head when you stated the above.
That would be great. As sovereign entities, the states could then decide on a year-by-year basis how much they should send in and how much they would withhold. Some states will simply decide they can use the money better back at home.
I do believe he would do that, and I don’t say that about any politician. The democrats will present this as stealing from the poor and giving to the rich. Hopefully Cruz team will come up with a simple one liner to get low info voters on board.
What is HR 25?
The NRST is the way to go, morally, because it taxes consumption and not production.
The prebates aren’t that hard to understand, it’s just exempting the first X amount spent as assuming that this spending is what a poverty level person would by just to exist.
And the great thing about that is that the ‘rats can’t use the prebate system to exempt their constituents from taxes.
You think lobbying is bad now? You think the prostitutes in congress are bad now? Wait til the EPA, DHS and DoE have to come to congress for funds. They’ll make the other lobbyists look like pikers.
The problem with shifting from taxing income to taxing consumption is that it isn’t fair to people who have already been taxed on income.
We need a complete rethink of national taxation to create a true, broad-based economic growth for the future. That will require first going to the flat tax plan Steve Forbes proposed in 1996, then put into place the structure to finally phase out the income tax within 3-4 years afterward (including repealing the 16th Amendment) and replacing it with something like FairTax (Cruz has expressed interest in FairTax recently).
Imagine US$900+ billion per year freed up for economic activities and not more taxes on the process of earning money. The result would be an economic boom on a scale that would far surpass the economic boom of the 1980's.
One could go back to the original 1913 version where only the top quadrant of income earners even had to file a payment. Roughly half aren’t paying anything now.
“In its purest form, a “flat tax” treats all taxpayers equally. Income is taxed at the same rate regardless of earnings or wealth, while allowing for no tax deductions or exemptions. But Cruz said his flat tax proposal might allow some deductions, possibly for popular write-offs like for charitable donations and mortgage interest charged on a primary residence, paid annually by homeowners.”
When you allow even one carve out, here come the special interest lobbyists. Better to bite the bullet and say no exceptions. That let’s you get the standard tax rate to the lowest possible level for everyone, while playing no favorites.
I’ll give you an example. HR 25 is to the US Income Tax Code what Year 2016 100 Gigabyte Ultra Burst Wimax is to 1988 100 baud dialup.
https://www.congress.gov/114/bills/hr25/BILLS-114hr25ih.pdf
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.