Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: cotton1706
2 posted on
04/27/2015 11:25:00 AM PDT by
stephenjohnbanker
(My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
To: cotton1706
They should be prosecuted, but we all know they won’t because of their political connections.
3 posted on
04/27/2015 11:26:59 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(True followers of Christ emulate Christ. True followers of Mohammed emulate Mohammed.)
To: cotton1706
We are lucky to get 6¢ on the dollar from anything connected with the Clintonsand liberalism in general.
4 posted on
04/27/2015 11:27:31 AM PDT by
Sasparilla
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
To: cotton1706
Not what's on their website now:
Why isn't this organization rated?
We had previously evaluated this organization, but have since determined that this charity's atypical business model can not be accurately captured in our current rating methodology. Our removal of The Clinton Foundation from our site is neither a condemnation nor an endorsement of this charity. We reserve the right to reinstate a rating for The Clinton Foundation as soon as we identify a rating methodology that appropriately captures its business model.
What does it mean that this organization isn’t rated?
It simply means that the organization doesn't meet our criteria. A lack of a rating does not indicate a positive or negative assessment by Charity Navigator.
To: LucyT; WildHighlander57; maggief; Liz; stephenjohnbanker
7 posted on
04/27/2015 11:29:08 AM PDT by
hoosiermama
(Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then or now?)
To: cotton1706
Always follow the money.
10 posted on
04/27/2015 11:31:18 AM PDT by
JPG
(Lefty reporters doing battle with Sen. Cruz will continue to be chewed-up and spit-out.)
To: cotton1706
On the “watch list.” That’s funny. I never saw this “charity” advertising in People Magazine with a photo of a sad looking polar bear on an ice floe to get grandma to send ten bucks. This “charity” would throw such a paltry “donation” in the slush fund to buy Hilary some cheap Ten High.
The seven-digit “donors” they’re after don’t give a damn about any “watch list.” In fact, being on that list is exactly why those donors give so much.
14 posted on
04/27/2015 11:35:37 AM PDT by
henkster
(Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
To: cotton1706
The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid, Just imagine if this was say The Bush Family Charity. You would hear about it every night on the evening news and cable news channels. How the MSM can sleep at night is beyond my comprehension.
15 posted on
04/27/2015 11:37:12 AM PDT by
McGruff
(It's not the crime, it's the cover-up they said.)
To: cotton1706
Someone should tell that sell-out jackass Chris Ruddy.
16 posted on
04/27/2015 11:38:28 AM PDT by
Dr. Thorne
(The night is far spent, the day is at hand.- Romans 13:12)
To: cotton1706
18 posted on
04/27/2015 11:42:33 AM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: cotton1706
If one of these sources can pinpoint how Bill and Hillary have misappropriated federal funds, someone needs to file a Qui Tam / RICO suit against them for recovery of the money.
You first have to give notice to the AG. I wonder if that has been done already?
To: cotton1706
Leave the Clinton's alone!
22 posted on
04/27/2015 11:44:24 AM PDT by
Veggie Todd
(The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. TJ)
To: All
24 posted on
04/27/2015 11:46:47 AM PDT by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: cotton1706
Operation Choke Point, please pick up the (dis)courtesy phone. Leave the little gun stores alone. I have a super-duper job for you, hot off the virtual press!
To: cotton1706
Hardly a revelation. 6% Spent by the hucksters versus 70% which is the norm.
This kind of thing was brought up when Billy started the Haiti fund. He collected the bucks and kept them.
To: cotton1706
94% of Clinton Foundation dollars DON’T go to charities? THIS IS A MONEY-LAUNDERING RACKET.
To: cotton1706
Funny thing is, EVERYONE who looks into "charities" KNEW these facts BEFORE Hillary started running for President!
This "charity" has been running these numbers and this game for YEARS! So why are they just NOW putting them on the "watch list?" Why are these typically liberal pundits and groups going after their beloved Hillary?
Don't get me wrong, this couldn't be happening to a better set of assholes, but why NOW? Why the Clintons? Why would the Democrats throw their most beloved President (since Kennedy) under the bus and through this wringer?!?!
29 posted on
04/27/2015 12:25:54 PM PDT by
ExTxMarine
(Public sector unions: A & B agreeing on a contract to screw C!)
To: cotton1706
To: cotton1706
To: cotton1706
LOL. Is there anyone alive with at least one brain cell functioning who does not know that the klintoons have been crooks, are crooks and will continue to be crooks? They are one sick extended family of criminal psychopaths. I hope Justice finds them all.
33 posted on
04/27/2015 12:34:16 PM PDT by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
