Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Marshals in South Gate Attack Cop Watcher Destroys her cellphone (NSFW Video)
Dee Jay private You Tube account via Photography Is Not A Crime Blogspot via PetaPixel Blog ^ | Published on April 19, 2015

Posted on 04/21/2015 9:43:40 AM PDT by Drew68

Here’s a video that’s causing an uproar among those who care about photographers’ rights. It’s a 53-second clip recorded on on April 19th that shows an encounter one woman had with police officers on a residential sidewalk in South Gate, California. While shooting photos or footage of the assault rifle-equipped officers with her smartphone, one of the men charges her, snatches the camera from her hands, smashes it on the ground, kicks it back at her, and then walks away.

Details are sparse at the moment, and we’ll update you when more info on this emerges.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: california; donutwatch; policebrutality
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: Drew68

Skinhead with a badge


21 posted on 04/21/2015 10:02:15 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
Not only that but she backed away as he was coming toward her and then he ran to her to do it.

She was looking backwards to step back safety. Look at the video.

It looks like they set a trap for the cop, someone was camming her while she was camming the police and caught the whole action on the video.

Trap? There is video everywhere, everyone has video capability in their hand.

In fact this was broad day light, and the sidewalks likely had at least half dozen neighborhood witnesess standing around gawking.

22 posted on 04/21/2015 10:04:43 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Later


23 posted on 04/21/2015 10:05:11 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68; stephenjohnbanker; Gilbo_3; Impy; NFHale; GOPsterinMA; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; Perdogg
I just found this :

The law enforcement officer is with the U.S. Marshals, South Gate Police Chief Randy Davis confirmed to NBC4. Davis said police officers from the South Gate Police Department were not involved in the incident, which he said took place Sunday.
Feds Investigate Video of Law Enforcement Officer Snatching Device From Onlooker's Hands (NBC Los Angeles Channel 4)

TV 4 blocked out the Marshal's face for the TV broadcast, but posted the unedited version at this link with the news broadcast.

24 posted on 04/21/2015 10:05:28 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat

She is out side the perimeter established by the LEOs. The officer wearing the vest with his back to the woman is the perimeter.


25 posted on 04/21/2015 10:06:30 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
RE :” Trap? There is video everywhere, everyone has video capability in their hand.
In fact this was broad day light, and the sidewalks likely had at least half dozen neighborhood witnesess standing around gawking. “

Look again, the video was taken pointing at her, not the police action, like they expected this to happen and recorded it.

26 posted on 04/21/2015 10:07:52 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

When you are about to engage in illegal activity on behalf of the police state its always wise to smash any video equipment in the vicinity.


27 posted on 04/21/2015 10:09:00 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

[[I am 75 & have never been in trouble with the law.]]

Boy oh boy are you in trouble!


28 posted on 04/21/2015 10:13:58 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

That could have been any operation that needed kept under wraps. If it was covert and one of a series of raids, it would have needed to stay covert.
Covert operations, especially ones that will have subsequent operations to follow don’t need to be instantly loaded up on the YouTubesFaceTweets for all the world to see.
It could have been some type of protective witness transport.
Anything.
Of course I don’t know what kind of police operation it was... all I know is what I see in the video and the fact that there are 1000 different possible scenarios.
I surely cannot judge it from a chair, looking at a video with absolutely ZERO facts to go on.


29 posted on 04/21/2015 10:15:23 AM PDT by envisio (I ain't here long... I'm out of napalm and .22 bullets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
Ask this station why they grayed out the US Marshal's face who did this for their TV broadcast.

NBC4 Los Angeles – KNBC
100 Universal City Plaza, Bldg 2120
Universal City, CA 91608

Main 818-684-4444
Breaking News Tips 818-684-3425
Investigative Tip Line 310-520-TIPS

nbclosangeles.com send-feedback

30 posted on 04/21/2015 10:18:13 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

BTW, at frame 0.20 the officer who grabbed and smashed her phone can be seen about 30’ from the female, just standing looking at her, prior to deciding to walk over and smash her phone.

This was no setup, even the person videoing the incident gasped when the officer did what he did and had no idea what was coming. Clearly the cop who smashed her stuff had no clue someone else was also videoing the incident from across the street.


31 posted on 04/21/2015 10:18:33 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

No wonder the police have a bad reputation.


32 posted on 04/21/2015 10:19:56 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

It is unlawful to selectively photograph people and use those photographs without their permission, IIRC.


33 posted on 04/21/2015 10:20:53 AM PDT by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TexasRepublic

“No wonder the police have a bad reputation.”

I wouldn’t last a week doing their job.


34 posted on 04/21/2015 10:22:15 AM PDT by HereInTheHeartland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
RE :”Clearly the cop who smashed her stuff had no clue someone else was also videoing the incident from across the street.”

Of course not, it was a well set trap.

Also the video has the quality of a real video camera, not a phone. They knew what they were doing, well at least one of them did.

35 posted on 04/21/2015 10:22:27 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ameribbean expat

You make a good slave.


36 posted on 04/21/2015 10:22:31 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
Look again, the video was taken pointing at her, not the police action, like they expected this to happen and recorded it.

No it wasn't. You have quite an imagination here. The video was of cops/incident and the female with the cell was in the field of view.

How in tarnation would these women possibly know this officer would suddenly do what he did? How is that possible?

??

37 posted on 04/21/2015 10:23:14 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: envisio

Show me a constitutional provision for the enforcement of “covert”.


38 posted on 04/21/2015 10:23:53 AM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos

I thought it was a radio station...


39 posted on 04/21/2015 10:25:19 AM PDT by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

If I get close to any cop except one from Plant City, I expect something bad to happen to me. That is why I avoid them like the plague.


40 posted on 04/21/2015 10:26:14 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson