Posted on 04/17/2015 6:23:57 AM PDT by xzins
Researchers in Hawaii are recruiting girls as young as 14 to participate in second trimester abortions, where the preborn baby is 18-24 weeks gestation, in order to test whether or not oxytocin can reduce bleeding in mothers during and after abortion.
Dr Mengele would be proud of them. Also, I'm sure they've done all investigation by police into the means by which these 14 year old girls have gotten pregnant.
Too bad they didn’t have this study and experimentation 55 years ago on Hawaii unborn babies then.
For just a fraction of a moment, I said, “What on earth are they doing, giving Oxycontin to kids?!” ... :-) ...
I remember reading and hearing about the horrors of medical research conducted by the ghouls of the Nazi regime. All the way from finding the most efficient way to dispatch problem Jews at the least cost (exhaust gas, rifle bullets through front-to-back victims, burnings, and finally Zyklon B). How humane of our Nazi’s today in their efforts to make sure the murdering mother has the least discomfort in her experience.
The goal it seems is to make it so pleasant and painless in fact, she would be eager and willing to do it all over again. How compassionate.
These kind of atrocities were government sanctioned once before - Zieg Heil!
(”As ye have done it unto these...”)
Absolutely outrageous! Unforgivable.
There was a Japanese medical researcher during WWII who did the same thing over there. I think he was “Colonel Ishi”...something like that. The Koreans showed a movie about it while I was there in the early 90’s: “Sticks”.
Horrendous stuff. Killings for so-called medical research. You wonder how this can get through a department and established as a project without someone going ballistic. But, they see no problem.
Their hearts are stone...or gone.
His Spirit would not permit this.
Lord have mercy,
Christ have mercy,
Lord have mercy.
“The U.S. House of Representatives had scheduled a vote during the March for Life in January of this year to ban abortions after 20 weeks but supposed pro-life Congresswomen Renee Ellmers (R-N.C.) and Jackie Walorski (R-Ind.) torpedoed the bill . . . “
Let’s all vote GOP in the 2016 elections. They’ll fight for you. They’ll stop the Democrats. They’ll oppose the progressive agenda. If you stay at home the Democrats will win and bad things will happen.
Just sitting here thinking about all of the benefit I’ve derived from the GOP House majority since January 2011. For some reason I can’t remember a thing. It must be dementia. My Republican friends assure me they are opposing the secular socialist state everyday.
That's not what they're doing. They are recruiting girls who are already seeking abortions to be part of their study of whether or nto oxytocin can reduce bleeding in mothers during and after abortion.
The truth is bad enough. No need to misrepresent it.
the names here presented are irrelevant to the “story” but I had to comment on one of them just to break the hideous chill that overame me while reading of this most bizarre pagan ritual..
“he study is currently under way at the Kapiolani Medical Center in Honolulu, led by Bliss Kaneshiro and Kate Whitehouse. “
which news service will be the first to gift us with a headline reading “Whitehouse does Abortions...”
It was Colonel Ishi.
I am going to FReep you something about him, and let you decide if I should post it.
Go here: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02083809
The parameters for inclusion do not say that the girls must ALREADY be seeking termination. This is the actual link to the study. Nor does it say that all of the inclusion criteria must apply.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02083809
The inclusion criteria specifies,
“Patients with fetal anomaly or intrauterine fetal demise that occurred at 18- to 24-weeks gestation”
If it was restricted to babies which had died in the womb that would be one thing. But any aborting of live babies is unacceptable. Fetal anomaly is rather a broad term and could mean anything from cleft palate to a baby with problems so severe they could not survive to full term.
I agree that the word anomaly can mean just about anything. It also strikes me that it doesn’t say that all of the inclusion criteria must apply to be included. It can be read to say that these are criteria by which they will determine inclusion. It could be one or more...or none.
The very first "Inclusion Criteria" is that the subject is "Requesting pregnancy termination."
And, by definition, all inclusion criteria must apply. That's how clinical research studies work - the list of inclusion criteria is a list of essential criteria that all study participants must have. So the page does not need to explicitly say that all inclusion criteria must apply, because that's what "inclusion criteria" means.
Requesting pregnancy termination is not defined by "when". On seeing this study, one could be requesting termination.
I don't doubt your experience regarding 'criteria'. I'm saying that the document in question doesn't say that all criteria must be met.
Finally, 'fetal anomaly' is so broad as to be the equivalent of Mitt Romney's 'health of mother'.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.