I agree that the word anomaly can mean just about anything. It also strikes me that it doesn’t say that all of the inclusion criteria must apply to be included. It can be read to say that these are criteria by which they will determine inclusion. It could be one or more...or none.
Unless the criteria reads “or” normally that means those criteria are all inclusive. At least that is the way it works when reading statutes or laws.
One obvious thing occurred to me, this trial means there are major concerns with excessive bleeding during 2nd trimester abortions. Funny how you never read about that even from pro abortion gynecologists.