Maybe if she claimed to be a Muslim convert they'd let her in..
To: smokingfrog
If she said she was a Muslim there would be no problems at all staying and getting a tax-funded apartment and all sorts of benefits.
2 posted on
04/12/2015 8:58:11 PM PDT by
GeronL
(CLEARLY CRUZ 2016)
To: Squawk 8888
3 posted on
04/12/2015 8:58:28 PM PDT by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: smokingfrog
emotionally supportive.?????
wha??
4 posted on
04/12/2015 9:03:39 PM PDT by
MeshugeMikey
("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
To: smokingfrog
5 posted on
04/12/2015 9:05:57 PM PDT by
RginTN
To: smokingfrog
My first thought...She’d be eligible for all sorts dole too.
7 posted on
04/12/2015 9:08:19 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
To: smokingfrog
It is a pretty good example of why you don’t want government bureaucrats making important decisions on your behalf.
8 posted on
04/12/2015 9:08:35 PM PDT by
fireman15
(Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
To: smokingfrog
The difference between a bureaucrat and a sack of fertilizer is that the bag of fertilizer can be used to make vegetables grow and flowers bloom. A bureaucrat is just a bunch of s**t.
9 posted on
04/12/2015 9:08:47 PM PDT by
BigEdLB
(They need to target the 'Ministry of Virtue' which has nothing to do with virtue.)
To: smokingfrog
Similar thing happened to me after marrying my British hubby. Threatened to be deported from the UK after following all the protocol and put in a holding area with a guard to be sent back to the US.
Crazy.
Long story.
10 posted on
04/12/2015 9:09:30 PM PDT by
RushIsMyTeddyBear
(The White House is now known as "Casa Blanca".)
To: smokingfrog
Schengen visa situation. Read up on it. Roughly twenty-five European countries signed it and it basically limits how long someone can stay without a full-up visa (fair amount of paperwork). The days when someone would arrive and stay eight months walking around European cities are long gone as a college student.
To: smokingfrog
45 years? Isn't that enough to prove it isn't a sham marriage?
Is there a precedent of questioning a marriage that lasted longer than 10 years?
To: smokingfrog; Clive; exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; ...
To all- please ping me to Canadian topics.
Canada Ping!
18 posted on
04/12/2015 9:28:57 PM PDT by
Squawk 8888
(Will steal your comments & post them on Twitter)
To: smokingfrog
Looks like the government and lawyers there are extorting the poor couple. They’re older, too. They shouldn’t be expected to act like spring chickens.
24 posted on
04/13/2015 12:14:40 AM PDT by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
To: smokingfrog
What is the point of Canada being a “dominion” of the queen if a pakistani muslim has more rights and privileges in England than a Canadian?
25 posted on
04/13/2015 12:49:41 AM PDT by
Ethan Clive Osgoode
(<<== Click here to learn about Evolution!)
To: smokingfrog
Once upon a time Britannia ruled the waves. Now the waves wogs rule Britannia.
26 posted on
04/13/2015 1:21:16 AM PDT by
cynwoody
To: smokingfrog
Canadian women can be very cold, ever since the federal government of Canada implemented the Advisory Council on the Status of Women (1973).
No wonder the Brits are requesting a confirmation of affection!
30 posted on
04/13/2015 10:45:02 AM PDT by
Candor7
(Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson