Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Group calling for arrest of responding police officer in Walter Scott shooting
LIVE 5 NEWS ^ | 10 APRIL 2015 | LIVE 5 NEWS

Posted on 04/11/2015 5:56:39 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist

NORTH CHARLESTON, SC (WCSC) - Officials with the National Bar Association are calling for the immediate arrest and indictment of a North Charleston police officer who responded to the shooting of Walter Scott. Officer Clarence Habersham was the officer on scene after Michael Slager shot and killed Scott.

According to the group, Habersham filed an incomplete police report on the shooting of Walter Scott and left "material facts out of his report."

Habersham gave the following narrative in a North Charleston Police Department report that was released to the media:

(Excerpt) Read more at live5news.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: donutwatch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last
To: flaglady47

Remember your words when a cop shoots and kills you or a loved one.... “she could have been an ax murderer for all he knew”


81 posted on 04/12/2015 1:12:20 PM PDT by free_life (If you ask Jesus to forgive you and to save you, He will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: free_life; MinuteGal

“Remember your words when a cop shoots and kills you or a loved one.... “she could have been an ax murderer for all he knew””

My family and relatives aren’t crooks, or criminals with records, so myself and my kin have nothing to worry about. How about yours? This guy had about 10 charges against him at least, and two of them were assault related. And he ran. Why did he run? Because he didn’t want to end up in jail again. Instead he ended up dead. Bad tradeoff.


82 posted on 04/12/2015 1:39:41 PM PDT by flaglady47 (The useful idiots always go first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

That’s an easy game you picked. It’s called ‘let’s make absurd assumptions’.

So you’re a cop lover. Big ones? Little ones? same sex? opposite sex? Do you like the blue uniformed ones like NYC or do you like the ones in tight Khakis with calf high patent leather boots and aviator sunglasses like you find out west?

You have a collection of video’s of police shootings and beatings that you frequently watch? Do you have every kick, punch and baton beats of Rodney King’s beating memorized? Do you have a framed photo of Vicki Weaver being shot by a sniper while unarmed and holding her child? Did you add a laugh track to the video of the Miriam Carey being shot by Whitehouse police?

Did it send shivers up your spine when you watched the video of the 33 year old Charleston cop gunning down a 51 year old pudgy black man waddling away as fast as he could? Did the officer who dramatically paused, took careful aim with a double cupped grip and present his profile to the target and squeezed off the ‘kill shot’ into the man’s back, arouse you?

Take the guns away from 50% of the cops. That will give them a much needed attitude adjustment. While we’re at it, lets do away with no knock 4:00 am warrants, cavalier asset forfeiture. Confiscating of and never returning legally owned guns, Harassing witnesses for taking cell videos, setting up confiscation road blocks during regional crises, and choking to death scofflaw violators.


83 posted on 04/12/2015 1:51:43 PM PDT by Usagi_yo (Enormous wealth without God, something's bound to go wrong here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo

I’m afraid your psyche is an unhealthy one regarding police. Very unhealthy. And your tirade here is just not normal. End of conversation. I don’t think your lid is screwed on right.


84 posted on 04/12/2015 1:55:30 PM PDT by flaglady47 (The useful idiots always go first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

Ooh, a new game. I can play this one too.

You’re delusional. Not in any specific ways, just very delusional. And you’re meek excuses, weak anecdotes, shady comparisons and flimsy strawmen also indicates that you are narcissistic, a common trait among the delusional. End of conversation, what conversations? Nothing you said remotely resembled a conversation, not to mention coherent. I don’t think you know what you’re talking about.


85 posted on 04/12/2015 2:06:16 PM PDT by Usagi_yo (Enormous wealth without God, something's bound to go wrong here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo; MinuteGal

“Nothing you said remotely resembled a conversation, not to mention coherent. I don’t think you know what you’re talking about.”

No, but I have a very good idea who I’m talking to. And I don’t like it. Buzz off. Normality isn’t part of your “game” plan.


86 posted on 04/12/2015 2:11:29 PM PDT by flaglady47 (The useful idiots always go first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

You’re the one who first started tossing personal invectives. I just thought you wanted to play a game

And .....

I believe “(The useful idiots always go first)”

Cheers, (You’re tag line is showing)


87 posted on 04/12/2015 2:17:36 PM PDT by Usagi_yo (Enormous wealth without God, something's bound to go wrong here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo; MinuteGal

“You’re the one who first started tossing personal invectives. I just thought you wanted to play a game”

Your “game” isn’t funny. You outed yourself in # 83, for all of Freeperdom to see. Talk about invective. You’ve got a corner on that market. We’ll let your fellow Freepers judge if you have an unhealthy agenda. Now, as I said before, buzz off. Thank you in advance.


88 posted on 04/12/2015 2:30:07 PM PDT by flaglady47 (The useful idiots always go first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

Okay, you can have the last word.


89 posted on 04/12/2015 2:46:10 PM PDT by Usagi_yo (Enormous wealth without God, something's bound to go wrong here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo; flaglady47
You've already established you're a cop-hater......painting them with a broad brush...and now you're just getting more and more hysterical and unhinged.

Since, in this Scott shooting, there aren't enough verifiable facts for you to pound away at one way or the other, you're resorting to just pounding the table.

Most unconservative-like, at the least. Have a beer and settle down.

Leni

90 posted on 04/12/2015 2:48:11 PM PDT by MinuteGal (DUMP GOOGLE ! - ALLY OF OBAMA AND HITLERY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

Scott was in full retreat and no further danger to the cop. The officer stopped firing and took deliberate aim for a kill shot. As far as the taping goes there is a map of this chase that went for some distance. The person taping couldn’t see or had no angle prior to them entering the videoed area.

FWIW the cop missed with three rounds. What if they hit an innocent bystander ALA NYPD tradition.


91 posted on 04/12/2015 2:57:07 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo; Sherman Logan; MinuteGal

Thank you. Now go and read the new thread entitled: Game Changer OR Paradigm Shift, from Breitbart, with charts, video’s, and pics, for your further edification. You are wrong here, as is Sherman Logan, and I will try very hard to bite my tongue and not say “I told you so”, however I told you so.


92 posted on 04/12/2015 3:05:10 PM PDT by flaglady47 (The useful idiots always go first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

Read my # 92 and go to thread referred to therein.


93 posted on 04/12/2015 4:22:45 PM PDT by flaglady47 (The useful idiots always go first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Aleya2Fairlie
Nope, just before your time I guess.

LOL!

Yeah, whatever you say, n00b. :)

94 posted on 04/12/2015 7:08:04 PM PDT by kiryandil (Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$; Usagi_yo; Sherman Logan
I was listening to a conservative talk show host who offered an interesting test to expose Jackboot Lovers for what they are:

"If Walter Scott had Tased Michael Slager, then dropped the weapon and run away, would Slager shooting Scott in the back be justified?"

I see at least two "people" [I use the term loosely] on this thread that would answer with a resounding YES!

Now we know why the "Randoms" ended up in the ovens at Auschwitz. Because Leather can do no wrong... :)

95 posted on 04/12/2015 7:27:45 PM PDT by kiryandil (Egging the battleship USS Sarah Palin from their little Progressive rowboats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

Still doesn’t change the fact that Scott was shot in the back while retreating. That is clear. Unarmed and out of shape 50 year old guy was to much for a much younger cop? Please.


96 posted on 04/13/2015 4:10:31 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson