Posted on 04/09/2015 4:26:02 PM PDT by smokingfrog
I object to sanctimonious drivel.
Explain then exactly what my comment was and what it means.
Is there another country anywhere that is more obsessed with the way it treats career criminals?Have we established that he was,in fact,a "career criminal"?
He was hired in Dec 2009.
Our exchange was regarding the dead guy but you seem to be referring to the cop.Or are you?
Just because the public has not been told what else occurred, does not mean there is no more evidence.
Anyone not directly involved in the investigation thinking they “know all” in this case is delusional.
There is no more evidence. They have all they’re going to get on this. They can even count the seconds from the traffic stop and when the suspect left the video field of view until shots fired. And that’s not much time at all. I’d guess 15 seconds. My point is them releasing the officers statement is not going to change anything at this stage of the game unless someone plan’s on changing it prior to it’s release.
So you understand I never once I implied or suggested I “know all” regarding their internal investigation. I don’t.
I have instead several times commented that I have no idea what the officer picked up, dropped, and then picked up another object. This was only after others commented they were convinced the officer was intentionally planting or moving evidence.
I like to keep my comments focused on what we do know.
BTW interesting monicker you have there.
One more thing Xpert, that's not what I suggested they do. I was referring to the officer's statement being released. That's a done deal and won't change. Or shouldn't.
I'm perfectly comfortable letting our comments stand on their own rather than continue to provide you with an opportunity to violate "the first rule of holes."
Which is tacit admission that you misconstrued it, willfully or otherwise.
You mention "inching up on deceit"; I call "projection".
...
Obviously you have a case of “can’t see the forest for the trees”.
Jumping into conclusions too early might later prove embarrassing.
I noted you failed to use any quote from me. Very slick.
If you could be specific and quote my, “Jumping to conclusions”.
Take your time. Thanks.
Your post 151
“They’ve had everything they’re going to get here. There is no more evidence to collect.”
As previously retorted, “unless you are part of the investigation, there is no basis for your assertion” or conclusion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.