Posted on 04/09/2015 11:11:23 AM PDT by drewh
Game of War: Fire Age has managed to gain quite a bit of popularity, not because of its amazing graphics, revolutionary gameplay or some sort of remarkable advancement in technology. Nope. Game of War gains more than $1 million a day all thanks to Kate Upton and some very effective television ads.
LA Times has a detailed breakdown of the mobile ad arena, where publishers are constantly battling against cultural trends and marketing methods to attract as many players as possible to their little known mobile games.
According to the article, Machine Zone Games has managed to run 9,000 television ads for Game of War: Fire Age. If the name doesn't sound familiar, perhaps the ad will look familiar to you, featuring model Kate Upton.
The above ad has been viewed more than 7.8 million times after airing during the Super Bowl back in February. However, the ads have been incredibly effective, garnering Machine Zone the number 2 spot on the top grossing mobile games list and the number 38 spot as the top grossing free-to-play game. Clash of Clans and Candy Crush Saga are still crushing it on the charts, but Game of War is right up there with them.
According to Think Gaming, Game of War is raking in more than $1.2 million a day. Not only that, but the coveted DAU estimates (for daily active users who log in and actually put some time into the game) hovers around 2.4 million. So roughly, you could translate that into nearly half of all players who log in and play Game of War each day could spend $1 and it generates Machine Zone some ample revenue.
However, all of this revenue and canvassing of television with ads of Kate Upton and the little mobile game that could has come at a heavy price. Nothing gained is earned for free. According to the LA Times article, ISpot.tv, a financial ad tracking firm, has estimated that Machine Zone has spent $80 million on those 9,000 television ad spots.
The article notes that more companies are pouring big money into mobile marketing on television to garner audiences. We've recently seen Liam Neeson of Taken fame appear in an ad for Clash of Clans to startling success and popularity, and companies like King Digital Entertainment and Zynga have been at the forefront of mobile gaming and advertising, racking up a lot of revenue along the way.
However, that's only a small subset of the mobile gaming market. There thousands of games flooding the mobile gaming that go completely unheard of or unseen. According to Gamasutra there are 500 mobile games launched every single day on Apple's iTunes app store. How many of those go on to make $1 million a day?
There are random successes like Flappy Bird, and even Rovio the creators of Angry Birds chalked a lot of their success up to luck as opposed to nailing down some secret, scientific formula.
For those who don't hit the big numbers, there are repeated stories of developers opting to leave the mobile gaming space altogether due to the difficulty of turning a profit with their games. While mobile games are extremely popular and are played by billions of people the world around, there's an issue of getting the game seen and keeping people playing maintaining that profit-positive DAU margin.
Other firms have experimented with various forms of advertising to a modicum of success, but it looks like there's two things that really can't be denied in the case of Machine Zone's Game of War: 1) spending big works wonders for putting eyes on your product. 2) Sex sells.
Table, couch, plush chair, back seat... It doesn’t much matter.
Actually there are mostly adults who play the game. But I confess I did download because of her.
You did ask about exposure, didn't ya?
(Of course the ad campaign was a smashing success: It's f'n Kate Upton.)
She does look better in clothes (and armor).
I suspect she has something on underneath assisting with an hourglass figure, because she clearly does not have such a figure in a bikini.
Personally, I think Hannah here is WAY HOTTER!
Actually there are mostly adults who play the game. But I confess I did download because of her.
She has hair?
p.s. He’s lying. Its what guys do when their wife asks them if another girl is pretty.
I wanna play.
I can think of at least two reasons to hire Kate Upton for a commercial...
Sports Illustrated wanted to do something special for next months swimsuit issue, so it decided to blast Kate Upton to 34,000 feet above the surface of the earth for a Zero-G photo shoot.
Teaming up with Zero-G Corp. down in Florida, the magazine sent Ms. Upton up 17 times in a converted Boeing-727 known as G-Force One, Discovery News reported.
The ZERO-G experience was really exhilarating for everyone involved, said M.J. Day, editor of the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue, in a statement. We have been almost everywhere in the past 50 years with SI Swimsuit, but we have never done anything like this. It was certainly the most out-of-the-box shoot. Once again, Kate surprised us all with how she handled modeling in weightlessness.
I can think of at least two reasons to hire Kate Upton for a commercial...
The commercials are working being the primary reason.
Man, did she ever. I’m no Tiger fan, but not very good in the playoffs. Now he’s on the DL I think.
Is she NOT the cure? Seriously, I can’t remember another model that hot since the 90’s.
She’s a supermodel that looks like she’s had a donut now and then.
How is that bad?
My husband plays. It is a complicated game with alliances, skirmishes, major battles, etc. He didn’t even know Kate Upton did commercials for it (though he does now.)
I think there are many more science experiments that would benefit from her help!
For example, the effect of ice water on cotton fabric covered skin has never been fully examined from a scientific standpoint
Make a note: Ted Cruz needs some ads on a beach with exotic hotties walking around.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.