Back when the rules of engagement made sense and we knew how to prosecute a war against our enemies.
(a) Whoever, with intent to interfere with, impair, or influence the loyalty, morale, or discipline of the military or naval forces of the United States:
(1) advises, counsels, urges, or in any manner causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States; or(2) distributes or attempts to distribute any written or printed matter which advises, counsels, or urges insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.(b) For the purposes of this section, the term “military or naval forces of the United States” includes the Army of the United States, the Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, and Coast Guard Reserve of the United States; and, when any merchant vessel is commissioned in the Navy or is in the service of the Army or the Navy, includes the master, officers, and crew of such vessel.
Might be seditious, but they’ll get a pass. It wouldn’t be good press for the military to try veterans, even if it’s against the law.
We don’t live in a nation of laws anymore.
may I have M O R E drones please
may I have M O R E drones please
“...Veterans Democratic Club of Sacramento County and the Sacramento chapter of Veterans for Peace....”
Hmm... right there, one stops reading...
Let me know when the DoJ enforces this part of the US Code.
Back when the rules of engagement made sense and we knew how to prosecute a war against our enemies.
What’s the moral case against drones, as opposed to bombs or bullets, say? Perhaps we should restrict ourselves to short bladed weapons in wartime?