“That was mean.”
I didn’t begin the discussion, I responded to one of two sequential posts jokingly assigning him the Darwin award. I refuted the assertions, which WERE mean, but you judged mine to be mean instead.
Your condescension was misplaced.
At least no FReeper has brought up the names of the dead children YET
This is an awful series of events.
And I can actually understand the guy running it in the house, if theft is a neighborhood issue. But, warning labels are there for a reason....
“I refuted the assertions”
He killed not only himself, but also all 7 of his progeny. He retroactively ensured that his Darwin Awards remained safe.
Seriously, I thought you were being sarcastic. And, by assuming your earlier post assarcastic, I thought it was mean. Now that I know that you were not sarcastic, it am going to re-state my observation of your earlier response — that was dumb.