Posted on 03/31/2015 10:20:46 AM PDT by EveningStar
... “You guys have said repeatedly that we shouldn’t be able to discriminate against anyone, but if you just ignore the existence of this law, can’t we already do that now? Can’t so-and-so in Richmond put a sign up and say ‘No Gays Allowed?'” she asked. “That’s not against the law, correct?”
“It would depend,” Bosma replied. “If you were in a community that had a human rights ordinance that wouldn’t be the case.”
“But most of the state does not have that, correct?” the reporter pressed.
“That’s correct,” Bosma admitted ...
(Excerpt) Read more at politicususa.com ...
Another lie
How about “No QUEERS allowed” ?
Libs lie, it’s in their DNA.
A no gays sign would be wrong but, forcing someone to celebrate a union between peter and paul violates the 1st amendment.
Yet another attack on free speech
Hobby Lobby was forced to pay for abortion.
Wal-Mart muzzie cashier’s can’t be forced to scan pork products.
Trucking companies shipping booze couldn’t force muzzie drivers to transport booze.
RE: A no gays sign would be wrong but, forcing someone to celebrate a union between peter and paul violates the 1st amendment.
So, which is it on this bill?
According to this article, Indiana’s Senate Pro Tem and the Speaker of the House held a joint news conference admitting that “No Gays allowed” signs would be permitted in areas within Indiana.
If so, this doesn’t look like it is limited to an attempt to defend a Christian from celebrating a gay wedding.
No business would put up such a sign. Straw man. Pence caved; spineless.
Never mind the loaded questions that these reporters are asking. Would the same reporters have a problem with “No Christians allowed” signs?
RE: Pence caved; spineless.
Caved? What did he do? Is he going to UN-DO what he did?
If a bar refuses to serve a drunk — is the bar owner a bigot?
If a daycare refuses to hire a child molester — is the daycare owner a bigot?
If a preacher refuses to officiate over a three person wedding — is the preacher a bigot?
No gays signs being allowed is also a colossal lie.
This is about stopping Pence from announcing a run for the prez as much as it is about the legislation.
RE: Would the same reporters have a problem with “No Christians allowed” signs?
I believe their answer would be ‘yes’.
RE: No gays signs being allowed is also a colossal lie.
So, you’re saying that the Senate Pro Tem and Speaker of the house both LIED about the law that was passed?
Good. Might wake some people up to how it feels to be a legal gun owner.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=822722827802551&id=128334087241432 Todd Starnes Facebook page
Their answer, but not their “feelings”?
If there was as much outrage out of these journ0lists over the USSC’s decision with respect to US flag T-shirts during “Cinco de Mayo(nnaise)”, we might actually get somewhere towards restoring the USA rather than tearing it down.
NO SODOMITES
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.